North American Union question to Ron Paul :: (CNN debate) ::
tags:
Stumble This1st question to ron paul at the cnn/youtube debate. they try so hard to make him look bad, and fail.
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
|
| |||||||||||||||
ron paul,amero,north american union North American Union question to Ron Paul :: (CNN debate) ::
Comments  playlists with this video Save America.. by firedoggod
• Election08 - Debates by joedirt
who voted for this video 8727
- Grimm
- siftbot
x28who has this post bookmarked Constitutional_Patriot
- Grimm
- firedoggod
North American Union Question To Ron Paul :: (CNN Debate) :: Related Videos
| Watch this Video NextFriends O' the Sift Top New Videos by Vote  Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week Newest Appreciated Comments         | ||||||||||||||
they really could have tried a little harder at making the questions seem more random, it's obvious there's a corporate political agenda at work here...
but dr.paul gives the best possible answer! totally turns it around. watch how the Skesis squirm!
with this answer Dr.Paul's brought the project for a North American Union to the public's attention. it's a 'real' conspiracy-of-ideas (a plan!) between some very powerful individuals.
NAFTA is good. A highway from Mexico to Canada sounds great to me. Super-duper highspeed gas-free bullet train would be even better! Why are Mexicans dying in the desert to get to America? Because some people insist on halting capitalistic opportunity at the southern border to the exclusion of the other, whose mere existence allegedly "threatens our sovereignty".
Wealth is created when capitalism is permitted to function, and it is destroyed when barriers are erected to impede it. The ambiguous term "globalism" seems to me a xenophobic term of attack on equal-opportunity capitalism.
Would Paul maintain price controls on milk that subsidize US farmers, in the name of US sovereignty? Because there are plenty of people south of the border interested in producing milk at lower cost, at actual honest market value and without government intervention, whose utter exclusion exemplifies the real cause of the "border problem".
We pay more to US dairy farmers for their products than the products are worth. Then we pay to police the border. If Mexico was permitted to participate in the market in the first place, we'd pay neither, and we'd actually be addressing, finally, the real "border problem": the problem of anti-capitalism, the problem of exclusion and control.
I am a long-winded f'er. But wow, Paul suggested a NAFTA train would make immigration from Mexico worse, and I see the opposite. It would mean more jobs in Mexico, more participation and thus more wealth in the world, while addressing the true immigration problem, which is economic closedness rather than physical openness.
And ice cream would be cheaper. Mmmm...
I've tried telling people about the possibility of an Amero (like our Euro) and a North American Union, they won't believe me, probably because it sounds way too Orwellian from this perspective. But when it's finally squidgied into the public consciousness - the majority won't even think anything of it...