What color is your aura? Nonexistant? Mine too.
tags:
Stumble ThisJames Randi tests an "aura seer".
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
|
| |||||||||||||||
randi,skepticism,credulity,paranormal What color is your aura? Nonexistant? Mine too.
Comments  playlists with this video Discuss! by MINK
• Skeptic's Handbook by EDD
who voted for this video gluonium
- mauz15
- Memorare
- bamdrew
- drattus
- RobotAdam
- Deano
- berticus
- henryflower1132
- teebeenz
- Spiff
- pro
- quantumushroom
- Obsidianfire
- cheesemoo
- oohahh
- theaceofclubz
- bigbikeman
- gorillaman
- johnald128
- HaricotVert
- samnmax
- eatbolt
- ant
- schma
- Sketch
- Fletch
- deathcow
- southblvd
- blankfist
- devinsorbo
- bhyphenlow
- karaidl
- Plonq
- bluecliff
- firefly
- rbar
- kilwrath
- AnimalsForCrackers
- gerds
- siftbot
x6 - EDD
who voted against this video MINK
who has this post bookmarked MINK
What Color Is Your Aura? Nonexistant? Mine Too. Related Videos
| Watch this Video NextFriends O' the Sift Top New Videos by Vote  Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week 14. d3bas3r
(124 votes) Newest Appreciated Comments           | ||||||||||||||
Favorite part is how he doesn't get the short girl with the huge hair right when you can clearly see her outline. This could have totally backfired if the guy had a great eye for details.
"Obsessed with reality", that's a cool quote
""obsessed with reality". ....Just what IS reality gluonium? A better question is, what is YOUR reality.
There a more objective test: When the firs person stand in front of his hypothical lot, a flash behind reveal if the lot is empty (who mean the seer have see right). Repeat the exercise three time, after
It was a demonstration. And he's never claimed to be a scientist (afaik). (But I guess being "smug" would preclude him from that occupation anyway, huh?) He's a former magician and skeptic who is simply showing people how foolish it is to buy into this dreck. His million dollars is safe. I swear it is... on the bible.
"Just a lame t.v. show host"? Awww, did he make you angry? Is he a poopy-head, too? Some people can't see the truth right in front of them, and get angry at anybody that crashes their fantasy worlds of magic sky gods, auras, fortune tellers, psychics, et al. Grow up.
And choggie... arty whores only impress themselves.
doubterobot.
You obviously (obviously) have no idea what I believe, and you jump to conclusions to support whatever disjointed, rambling prose the 100 monkeys locked in your basement can come up with. The only thing even remotely clever about your comments is your incredibly high word count/points made ratio, often undefined. Some may see your act as wisdom bordering on insanity, or chalk it up as "choggie just being choggie". I just see it as stale.
This pretty much sums up my view on the unexplained and unknown. Please don't watch it. You need all the boogeyman you can conjure.
Have a nice day.
(Was gonna post this private, in reply to your bs profile comment, but didn't feel like defending on two fronts)
About the title... "invisible" and "nonexistent" are not the same thing.
Even if this clip did prove this one guy to be a fraud (which it doesn't) then extrapolating those results to all the universe would be VERY unscientific.
If the guy had guessed right, it still wouldn't have proved anything because this is on TV, and TV is bullshit. All you scientismists would just say "lucky guess" anyway.
But his failure does NOT disprove anything at all, and Randi never says it does, because it doesn't.
Why can't scientismists be more scientific in their thinking instead of having blind faith in rationality?
You all just choose what you want to believe, and then jump on any youtube clip that vaguely seems to suggest agreement, and turn it into some kind of Reality Bible.
replacement: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZeQGld5QBU