Watch out for the Sign • VideoSift: Online Video *Quality Control

Watch out for the Sign

posted by antonye

1 month 3 weeks ago • 361 views

tags: Dumb cyclist, backflip, unintentional, oops, blind, bicycle, critical mass failure

Find more original videos from Sift Partner College Humor

comments (12)

embed

bookmarks (0)

playlists (0)

Stumble This

You should also watch
“Zap-It - Watch out, America!”

How could he miss a sign that big?
Well, he didn't...

Comments

Moving this video to antonye's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

written by siftbot

| 1 month 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

*promote

written by rottenseed

| 3 weeks 1 day ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued - promote requested by rottenseed.

written by siftbot

| 3 weeks 1 day ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Dumb cyclist' to 'Dumb cyclist, backflip, unintentional, oops, blind, bicycle, critical mass failure' - edited by rottenseed

written by siftbot

| 3 weeks 1 day ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Dupe

http://www.videosift.com/video/Near-Sighted-Biker-Gets-Closer-Look-At-Sign

written by Lurch

| 3 weeks 1 day ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Dupe Indeed
http://www.videosift.com/video/Near-Sighted-Biker-Gets-Closer-Look-At-Sign
When was this posted though?

1 month ago this one was published...

written by Zonbie

| 3 weeks 1 day ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Good point. The time stamps dont show when it was initially posted and it looks like both were in the queue at almost the same time one month ago. So, which one was actually first?

written by Lurch

| 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Can we *discuss this one to get the time stamps sorted out?

written by Lurch

| 2 weeks 4 days ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

This video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - discuss requested by Lurch.

written by siftbot

| 2 weeks 4 days ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

As to when it was posted initially seems irrelevant, it's about who publishes first. And with the same content from two different video sites, it's hard for siftbot to find the dupe in this instance.

I would say discard this vid and let the one that published first go forward.

written by youdiejoe

| 2 weeks 4 days ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Actually, I think in the era of the PQ, whoever posts first should get to stay, not whoever publishes first -- otherwise someone could just go around to people's PQs and post all the gems for themselves.

But anyway, look at the timestamp on when this was moved to antonye's PQ: July 3, 2:53 PM. That means this was posted on the first of July. The timestamp on the first comment on the other video is June 30, 3:22. That means that was was submitted first, and this one gets *discarded.

written by Sarzy

| 2 weeks 4 days ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Discarding this post - discard requested by member Sarzy.

written by siftbot

| 2 weeks 4 days ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Submit Comment

who voted for this video

antonye

- rottenseed

- shuac