Undercover At Gun Shows - Exposing The Loophole
tags:
Stumble ThisNew York City investigators pose as not so innocent gun buyers to test sellers at gun shows. Results are hardly surprising.
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
|
| ||||||||||||
new york,investigation,gun,show,seller,background,check,federal,law,loophole Undercover At Gun Shows - Exposing The Loophole
Comments  who voted for this video demon_ix
- longde
- MikesHL13
- Lendl
- UsesProzac
- Deano
- KnivesOut
- silvercord
- Sagemind
- MrFisk
- cyberwire
- spawnflagger
- rubadub
- ant
- TheSofaKing
- enon
- enoch
- Croccydile
- MaxWilder
- mongoosemonk
- isosceles
| Friends O' the Sift Top New Videos by Vote                 Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week 12. Seric
(139 votes) Newest Appreciated Comments        | |||||||||||
people in camouflage often fail background checks , because they blend in so well . DUM DUM DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I never understood wearing camouflage in an urban environment. It sort of makes you more conspicuous, which seems counter productive.
So if 30% of illegal guns are "connected" to gun shows...that tells me nothing...how about telling me what percentage of legal guns are "connected" to gun shows, that way I have a baseline.
These are legal transactions with a legal loophole, it's apparently easy enough to find blatantly illegal gun trafficers. I remember a TV news station in Los Angeles a couple of decades ago doing a story where it only took them a couple of days to find someone who would be willing to sell them fully auto submachine guns( illegal to own in that state) cash and carry out of the back of a van.
This country is saturated with guns, if a petty thief wanted one, a simple burglary could turn up a few, so I don't really see any point in this "oh no criminals have guns" hysteria. I would be seriously surprised if closing the legal loophole solved anything.