co2,propaganda,scary,ridiculous "They call it pollution, we call it life" - Anti Global Warming Reality Propaganda

"They call it pollution, we call it life" - Anti Global Warming Reality Propaganda

posted by CellWall 3 years 5 months 3 weeks ago • 2087 views

tags: co2, propaganda, scary, ridiculous

bookmarks (0)

GREAT DESIGNS FROM VIDEOSIFT'S T-SHIRT STORE
Support VideoSift - Buy a Shirt! Use coupon code SIFTFALL09 at checkout to save an additional 20% now!
Power Turns Me On	When I Grow Up	We Re Number One

Comments

no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, NO!

written by igorz

| 3 years 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I am voting these just to call attention to the HYPE - aslo changing the title to reflect industry propaganda.

written by James Roe

| 3 years 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes as our prime minister used to say

written by def

| 3 years 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

dont worry, i get the intent, thanks for posting this

written by igorz

| 3 years 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

This isn't a parody? I should make a movie outlawing H2O...

written by amatern | 3 years 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

can you imagine being the voice-over actress - she can't really be sleeping at night, can she?

written by clamboni | 3 years 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

i guess she is happy about the paycheck...

written by ypsilon

| 3 years 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

This clip is hilariously dumbed down. Thanks for sharing!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming

http://pubweb.epa.gov/air/airtrends/aqtrnd00/globwarm.html

http://www.tamug.edu/labb/Global_Warming_Info.htm

written by bamdrew

| 3 years 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Wow. They really mean what they say, just checked their website. That is hillarous. If they like CO2 this much, why not lock them in an air-sealed room and pump it full with CO2? Shitheads.

written by conan | 3 years 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 3 ▼ | flag spam (0)

conan for president!

written by ThwartedEfforts | 3 years 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I work for enviromental defense and no, We get these type of people all the time on the line. They claim that global warming is just something that some scientist invented to scare us. Basically democrats believe it...They mail us all the time.

I gave it my vote.

written by DarkSavior | 3 years 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

For anyone interested in the global warming debate, check out "State of Fear" by Michael Crichton. Basically it's about an organization trying to manipulate natural events to create global warming trends and cause panic...
Pretty good read.

written by firefly

| 3 years 5 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

umm, i'm a little confused... the pollution i think is the problem is Carbon MONOxide (CO). Carbon DIOxide (CO2) is a naturally occurring gas... that'd be like trying to ban Nitrogen...

written by pho3n1x

| 3 years 5 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Here is some good information on the subject for those that would like some scientific rationale for this phenomenon.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris061206.htm

written by tgeffeney | 3 years 5 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

It's only "propaganda" when you're against it. Global warming and cooling happen no matter what humans do. If the Chicken Littles get their way, we'll all be living in mud huts and crapping in pots to grow corn. For chrissakes, these nutjobs want WATER VAOPR to be labeled a pollutant. Just say no to the same old socialist BS. www.junkscience.com

written by quantumushroom

| 3 years 4 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

The same zeal for an issue for or against, can be seen at ball games and revival meetings.....The Religion of Global Warming....so chic.

written by choggie

member is hobbled for abuse of privileges

| 2 years 8 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

*promote

written by therealblankman

| 2 years 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Promoting this classic video back to the front page; last published Tuesday, May 30th, 2006 5:07pm PDT - promote requested by therealblankman.

written by siftbot

| 2 years 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I actually wouldn't have a problem with this if they answered their own question: "What would our lives be like then?" That's what makes this propaganda and not refutation. There's no information here.

written by tremormilo | 2 years 1 week ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I don't know what the problem is if it's labeled a "pollutant"? We have many legal pollutants, it just means that there's going to be an additional cost to it, so you as a business will either bear the cost, on-charge it, or look for ways to be more efficient, less "pollutive" and look for ways to do the same thing with non-pollutive methods.

The fact is, whether it's a pollutant or not, we should all be trying to conserve. If you don't believe it's for environmental reasons, believe it for your own pocket. Can't hurt.

written by buzz | 2 years 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Who's going to pay the additional cost for all those polluting volcanoes, rotting vegetation, and forest fires? You environmentally conscious people make me laugh with your contrived explanations for natural events and your fear mongering. In the 70's it was global cooling and now it's global warming. In 2030 it will be global cooling again. Will you then tell every one to burn more fuel to produce more CO2? There was a town in California that actually proposed an ordinance to ban Styrofoam cups because the manufacturing process used dihydrogen oxide, a known cause of severe injuries and thousands of deaths annually. There was some embarrassment but no acknowledgment of environmental knee jerk lunacy when it was pointed out that dihydrogen oxide is actually water. So forgive me if I seem a bit skeptical of a scientific "consensus" of the global warming "facts". After all, it was once a scientific "consensus" that the earth was flat and at the center of the solar system.

written by reason