The Largest Black Holes in the universe (Insane!, watch HD!)
tags:
Stumble This18 billion solar mass black holes. Yes. you are tiny.
|
▲
0
▼
|
|
NOVA: Monster of the Milky Way DVD added by: cybrbeast 
|
also: mmmm... hamburger galaxy
So one day, we may be the meat in an intergalactic hamburger.
Anyone else really dislike that narrator? His cadence and emphasis seems so random.
He's a young g-man from Half Life.
Anyone else really dislike that narrator? His cadence and emphasis seems so random.
No kidding. He sounds like a voice synthesizer reading from a text file. Either that or he's trying to mimic William Shatner (and doing a really bad job at that!).
>> ^Farhad2000:
>> ^rychan:
Anyone else really dislike that narrator? His cadence and emphasis seems so random.
He's a young g-man from Half Life.
animatoin was realy pore , 3d models and rendering were ok , but the animatoin was jerky , i think they were stretched for footage and so had to resort to using post animatoin rather than doing it in the 3d package.
The narrator is far less annoying then your posting style. You see all those red lines that appear under the "words" as you mash the keyboard? They mean things.
(blackhole...sucks things in)
yah narator pusses at anoying times making it hard to watch ,
animatoin was realy pore , 3d models and rendering were ok , but the animatoin was jerky , i think they were stretched for footage and so had to resort to using post animatoin rather than doing it in the 3d package.
Those are not animations wizzed up by some kid to look fancy, they are actual SIMULATIONS of galaxies colliding, black holes forming etc. and they are badass. The animation is not meant to impress animators, but to be informative.If you are looking for impressive space animations, go see the new Star Trek movie or something.
I don't think the animations of a black hole as a 3D dent on the map is a simulation.. I think it's just an animation, and a poor one at that. (That's only in the beginning I've seen though, so I'm sure it will pick up later in.)
Yes, some of it isnt exactly top-notch animation, I agree with that, but those are visualizations of invisible stuff, so they would probably look atleast inaccurate, no matter if Pixar spent two years on them. I am talking about the awesome bits where you can see early universe web forming supermassive black holes, the galaxies colliding etc, which is simulated on a supercomputer, and then rendered as animation
The sheer scale of it all is staggering.
Oh and *animation
^ "yah narator pusses at anoying times making it hard to watch"
The narrator is far less annoying then your posting style. You see all those red lines that appear under the "words" as you mash the keyboard? They mean things.
I see what you did very clever , before criticising others maby you should work on not making compleaty useless and moronic posts ?