terror,democracy,undermining,criminal,bush,congress,telcos,love,mark fiore Snuggly the Security Bear explains Warrantless Wiretapping.

Snuggly the Security Bear explains Warrantless Wiretapping.

posted by therealblankman

1 year 9 months 1 week ago • 1355 views

tags: terror, democracy, undermining, criminal, bush, congress, telcos, love, mark fiore

playlists (0)

Snuggly explains that breaking the law to spy on you is all about love.

GREAT DESIGNS FROM VIDEOSIFT'S T-SHIRT STORE
Support VideoSift - Buy a Shirt! Use coupon code SIFTFALL09 at checkout to save an additional 20% now!
Please Clean Up After Your Dogma	God Is Unbelievable	Aw Man I Shot Marvin In The Face

Comments

*politics

written by kronosposeidon

| 1 year 9 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Adding video to channels (Politics) - requested by kronosposeidon.

written by siftbot

| 1 year 9 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Tags for this video have been changed from 'terror, democracy, undermining, criminal, bush, congress, telcos, love' to 'terror, democracy, undermining, criminal, bush, congress, telcos, love, mark fiore' - edited by calvados

written by siftbot

| 1 year 9 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Well put, Snuggly. Who knew animated bears were so wise, or sarcastic?

written by moonsammy | 1 year 9 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

much truth is said in jest.

written by sirex | 1 year 9 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Some people wouldn't know the truth if it slapped them in the face, which it has, and was duly ignored. The so called warrantless wire tapping was aimed at connections from known/suspected terrorists OUTSIDE the USA contacting or being contacted by parties inside the USA. It was not aimed at private citizens talking to their mothers. Why are you people so in a twist over this? Something to hide maybe? Involved in voter fraud or political campaign scams? Afraid to get caught? I find it interesting that those who scream about freedoms the loudest are the very ones who wish to take those freedoms from people who disagree with them. I have nothing to hide and if some one wants to listen in on my phone they are more than welcome to be bored to death.

written by reason

| 1 year 9 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ -6 ▼ | flag spam (0)

reason, I hope you're just trolling.

written by xxovercastxx

| 1 year 9 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

reason, are you joking? Current FISA law already allows that, even in domestic cases. In fact they allow the president to start wiretapping 72 hours in advance without a warrant. There is also support to extend that time period up to 10 days. Over the decades of use, the FISA courts have only rejected 4 or 5 warrants. Since this is the case, why do we need warrantless wiretapping? We don't, unless you want to wiretap people that you have no possible justification to wiretap.

Quite frankly, I don't think you know what you are talking about. I find that people that want to give away our freedoms (while claiming that other people "must have something to hide") are usually woefully ignorant of history and woefully ignorant in general.

written by curiousity

| 1 year 9 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

This post has been removed from the Election08 channel by channel owner joedirt. Please review the FAQ to learn about appropriate channel assignments.

written by siftbot

| 1 year 8 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)