Stumble This | You should also watch “Matt Groening & cast sing the Spider-Pig song” |
Comments 
who voted for this video
oinkinstein
- qruel
- karaidl
- b0ost
- looris
- thesnipe
who voted against this video
Fletch
who has this post bookmarked
looris
SPIDER PIG FULL!! Related Videos
Matt Groening & cast sing the Spider-Pig song |  Spider Pig : The Full Length Song |  Spider Pig |
Top New Videos by Vote
Subscribe
Top 15 Sifters of All Time
Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week
VideoSift Links
http://www.videosift.com/video/Spider-Pig
Also, downvoting mycrofthomlz's submission before posting this was poor form. I might add that BOTH showed up in a VS search for "spider pig".
*blog
Anybody else?
EDIT: Yes, this one is slightly longer, and contains a short bit original doesn't, so I can see the the argument against dupe. But is it enough?
Definition of 'duplicate' is: "an identical copy of the original" (from a google search)
The question: Is this a duplicate video?
Seems to me that its similar but not an identical copy of the original. So if we were applying the rule literally and to the letter then technically, this is not a dupe. However, in keeping with the spirit of the rule and the sift's community value, I'm with Fletch on this one.
There is really no reason this should not already be *discarded. We can not establish the precedent that everyone should go about finding what they feel are "better" embeds and intentionally posting dupes."
I suggest this is included in the sift posting guidelines.
You didn't really mean to discard this did you, pipp? Damn, I'd save it so there can be more discussion, but I don't want to waste a save. Always new members that can benefit from these sift talks.
*save
sorry guys, i'll save or promote a post by whoever saves this.
Although siftbot is definitely a higher form of life, and seems omnipotent to us sifters, he still lives in a GIGO universe.
anyway I just proposed to fedquip a fixed version and he didn't use it, so I guess he shouldn't have used this one too.
Not sure what your second sentence means. If you sent fedquip a link to the newer version and he decided against using it, that's his prerogative. Then the question, I think, is whether the newer version is different enough to warrant another posting. I don't think it is. I just wanted to see what other sifters thought.
sure! I mean, I do not agree, but that's the rule, and I DO know that.
the second sentence is related to this by JR:
"I personally think that you should have probably just asked fedquip to swap out the embeds"
wheres the anykey?