Run down of tax plans from Obama & McCain
published by NetRunner 2 months 1 week ago • 1740 views
tags:
embed
email
playlists (0)

You should also watch
Barack Obama's Elitist Summer Abroad
The full report is available here.

The report comes from the Brookings Institute, a conservative-leaning think tank.
Comments subscribe to this feed
always good to see the media clarifying and reporting on substantive issues. that's real journalism folks!


written by aaronfr  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 7  | flag spam (0)
And what happens if you're making between 161k and 2.9m?


written by DavidRaine  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
They don't even bother to ask which money McCain is not going to spend in order to give EVERYONE a tax break.

As an aside, The pres has no say on taxation, only spending, by submitting a budget. Why are presidents supposed to have taxation schemes, when that is the job of the legislature?


written by dgandhi  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
>> ^DavidRaine:
And what happens if you're making between 161k and 2.9m?


I updated the summary to include the link to the full report.

If I recall correctly, that range contains the crossover from net reduction, to net increase. When all people in that range are averaged together, it ends up being a very slight reduction. However, that's balancing a relatively large number of people in the $180,000-ish range who get a fairly substantive tax cut, with a smaller number people who get over $500,000 who get a pretty big tax hike.

The Obama talking point is that the changeover is designed to happen at $250,000/yr income, which seems borne out by this report.




written by NetRunner  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
I also think the CNN reporter highlights another conservative myth successfully pushed by the Republican party with her "You would expect the Democrats to raise taxes on lots of folks, not just the super-wealthy."

Only if you get all your information from the Republican party, lady.


written by NetRunner  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 4  | flag spam (0)
>> ^aaronfr:
always good to see the media clarifying and reporting on substantive issues. that's real journalism folks!


It's closer than we're used to but not quite real journalism, it just seemed so because of what we've got to compare it to these days. Real journalism might have drawn a sharp difference between expiring temporary breaks Bush and a complicit congress gave the rich and actual new taxes rather than trying to paint the expiration what was a temp measure as a new tax. That's the biggest part of that jump for the rich, not new taxes or "going after" anyone as she said at 1:40 or so.




written by drattus  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
>> ^DavidRaine:
>> And what happens if you're making between 161k and 2.9m?

Unfortunately, you are killed by roving death squads.


written by deathcow  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 7  | flag spam (0)
>> ^DavidRaine:
And what happens if you're making between 161k and 2.9m?

>> ^NetRunner:
I updated the summary to include the link to the full report.


Thanks! I'll check it out.




written by DavidRaine  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Why do presidental candidates HAVE TO change taxes? It seems to me that Americans need to have "tidal taxes" that swing back and forth with each president.


written by gwiz665  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
It's so nice to have objective material to see.


written by Aemaeth  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Wait - low income starts at $33k?!?!

What the hell does that mean for me? I'm poverty stricken? I make way less than that!


written by MarineGunrock  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 3  | flag spam (0)
Yep, I guess we're some poor sonsabitches, MG.

Right now I'm sitting in my apartment ($385/month) at my desktop (2001 Compaq) after just riding my bike ($300) to a wedding where I gave the bride and groom some framed photographs of themselves ($5).

... hold the phone... I AM poor! When did this happen?


written by bamdrew  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 5  | flag spam (0)
Up vote for the link more so than the video. And Democrats have been the better purely economic choice for the majority of Americans since FDR. What is she thinking?


written by vermonter  | 2 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Finally progressive tax structures, not regressive. Bush was a fucking idiot. The middle class needs to recover.


written by Farhad2000  | 2 months ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
and who is CNN voting for? I KNOW!


written by AceOfKidneys  | 2 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Nvm. Interesting comparison.


written by Chaucer  | 2 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
>> ^dgandhi:
They don't even bother to ask which money McCain is not going to spend in order to give EVERYONE a tax break.

The days are long gone that the Republicans can play the "we are going to cut spending" card. They've been in charge of Congress more or less since 1994 and have out spent the Democrats...and that's not even counting the "trillions" spent off the budget on Iraq.




written by Grimm  | 2 months ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
I make under 20k and have to pay about 20% in combined social security tax / income tax / sales tax. Meanwhile, the capital gains tax rate is 15%.


written by jwray  | 2 months ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
This is kind of pointless without a discussion of how realistic these tax plans are with respect to the candidates' budget plans.


written by rychan  | 2 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I say we take half of everything a person earns over a million


written by Ryjkyj  | 2 months ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
WOW, I hope the low and middle class votes he picks up from this far outweigh the rich votes he just lost.


written by viewer_999  | 2 months ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
I guess anyone earning less than $38k in McCains plan gets sent to the numerous war fronts he plans to open up.


written by honkeytonk73  | 2 months ago | CH
 3  | flag spam (0)
>> ^MarineGunrock:
Wait - low income starts at $33k?!?!

What the hell does that mean for me? I'm poverty stricken? I make way less than that!

National averages I guess. I make a decent amount more but because of cost of living of where I live(ie, I couldn't get a room to rent below $750/month). I think that number comes from a national average that incorporates cost of living adjustments.





written by rottenseed  | 2 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
> I gave the bride and groom some framed photographs of themselves ($5).

Look we got a restraining order, if we see you at our bedroom window again with a camera I don't know whats going to happen.


written by deathcow  | 2 months ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment
log in or register to submit new comment


who voted for this video
NetRunner  - shuac  - Violator99  - aaronfr  - schmawy  - Crosswords  - philkar77  - Fedquip  - MysteryMachine  - guitarwolf  - littledragon_79  - islaywombats  - DavidRaine  - Norsuelefantti  - RedSky  - Lithic  - lucky760  - mintbbb  - Mysling  - slafleur  - sharkie  - PrinceOfEgypt  - smiley  - raddishs  - lesserfool  - swedishfriend  - Zonbie  - Hex  - nadabu  - drattus  - kwaran  - crotchflame  - gwiz665  - Bleedingsnowman  - finch451  - dystopianfuturetoday  - Aemaeth  - BoneyD  - cybrbeast  - doogle  - MarineGunrock  - punk225  - bluephoenix  - fizziks  - Xax  - reallyboredofcollege  - tagomi77  - Bidouleroux  - blutruth  - mj0lnir  - JonnyK  - vermonter  - jimnms  - radx  - jmd  - Farhad2000  - Issykitty  - Lumm  - Grimm  - Drachen_Jager  - Fjnbk  - Jordass  - spoco2  - moonsammy  - jwray  - thehelix  - Smugglarn  - rottenseed  - Ryjkyj  - chrismitchele  - Kuga  - dw1117  - sanderbos  - UnseenUltra  - critttter  - theaceofclubz

who has this post bookmarked
Bleedingsnowman  - philkar77  - theaceofclubz

Run Down Of Tax Plans From Obama & McCain Related Videos

Military Donates 6 Times more to Obama than to McCain

Obama Ad: McCain in the "Pocket" of Big Oil

Obama discusses McCain's Maverickiness