Ron Paul,The View,interview,Roe v Wade,whoopi,abortion Ron Paul on The View 12-4-07

Ron Paul on The View 12-4-07

published by blankfist

12 months ago • 1307 views

tags: Ron Paul, The View, interview, Roe v Wade, whoopi, abortion

You should also watch
“Tea Party 07 - Ron Paul, Once in a Liftetime”

2008 Presidential candidate Congressman Dr. Ron Paul is interviewed on The View on December 4, 2007.

Comments

Damnit Whoopi you're everywhere I turn now. Its funny how here is a guy works in CONGRESS and is a DOCTOR but they are going to talk to him like they know government and child birth better than he does. Whoopi "I dont think thats true sir", really? Like he wouldnt know what laws the federal government has passed, hell he probably was involved in the voting of that law but oh he must not know what he's talking aboutt. Then of course the end where the real chatty one has to take the typical dig at him as a loser

written by Jordass

| 12 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Ron Paul is AWESOME!

written by Architect4DrPaul

| 12 months ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Ron Paul should join The View as a full time host, except that he might drop the overall level of intelligence of the cast, impossible as that might seem...

written by BillOreilly

| 12 months ago | CH

▲ -2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

The style of this show, shall we call it "endless blabber" is like pointy knives poking into my cranium.

written by deathcow

| 12 months ago | CH

▲ 3 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Why does every interview has to mention that he's gonna lose or that he's got no chance of winning? What kind of attitude is that? I hate those predictions!

written by Fred_Chopin

| 12 months ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

BO,

You're about as stupid, but more redneck than your hero.

written by Rotty

| 12 months ago | CH

▲ 4 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I think it's a false dichotomy saying either-if on abortion. There's a very big difference between aborting a birth within the first month and in the eigth month.

The problem with moving it to a state level is that many states are retarded - or would ban it altogether, and that takes away the choice from the mother and thus removes it from the local authority, so to speak. Now, I honestly don't know the specifics of Roe v. Wade, but in Denmark, where I'm from, we have free abortion within the first 12 weeks, and after that special circumstances have to allow it - this is decided for each individual case.

If Roe v. Wade allows for eight month abortions - just like that - then I agree that it is murder, and it plays all to well in to "pro-life" and religious cooks hands.

(Btw, it's sort of fun how people always choose a "pro-something" never anti.. "anti-choice" sounds a bit worse than pro-life, and anti-life is just funny.)

written by gwiz665

| 11 months 4 weeks ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Roe v. Wade sets the abortion limit up to the point the fetus can live outside the womb (viable) unless the woman's health is in danger. States are also given the power to further regulate abortion; required counseling, a wait period, or parental notification or consent. I'm pretty sure there some state laws on 'late term' abortion, but I don't think the states can outlaw it completely.

written by Crosswords

| 11 months 4 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Ron Paul: facing the future by hiding in the past.

written by StukaFox

| 11 months 4 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Submit Comment

playlists with this video

Save America.. by firedoggod