RonPaul2008DotCom,Ron Paul Ron Paul Runs Rings Around Ignorant Reporter With The Truth
posted by Grimm
2 years 3 months ago • 7626 viewstags: RonPaul2008DotCom, Ron Paul
Comments 
playlists with this video current politica by calvados
• Discuss! by MINK
• Save America.. by firedoggod
• Top Videos of 2007 by siftbot
who voted for this video Grimm
- theaceofclubz
- dag
- DigitalAlloy
- Constitutional_Patriot
- samnmax
- Kurtz007
- wazant
- mkone
- Farhad2000
- pro
- Goofball_Jones
- loopy
- sometimes
- cybrbeast
- johnald128
- Mysling
- AnimalsForCrackers
- pmkierst
- Majortomyorke
- papple
- gwiz665
- joedirt
- Fred_Chopin
- enon
- mercury
- slafleur
- crotchflame
- Hanover_Phist
- Wake
- Kevlar
- Xenster
- Enzoblue
- bigbikeman
- gargoyle
- sbchapm
- slint
- therealblankman
- Sketch
- videosiftbannedme
- zippo
- oblio70
- Fedquip
- chiataur
- oinkinstein
- Shepppard
- statueofmike
- MycroftHomlz
- SlipperyPete
- karaidl
- HistNerd
- paragonsdemise
- messenger
- Selektaa
- pyrex
- jimnms
- Nebosuke
- twiddles
- nibiyabi
- xxovercastxx
- BoneyD
- justinianrex
- gerds
- Ickster
- mlx
- rougy
- NetRunner
- Bidouleroux
- Laith
- b403
- eff
- bluephoenix
- Obsidianfire
- jwray
- rbar
- Art
- sillma
- effin98
- Hex
- J-Rova
- ElessarJD
- Neuro
- Fjnbk
- 0323252
- henryflower1132
- jonb42
- MINK
- conan
- dennisj
- That1Swede
- Ursapolar
- Hastur
- timtoner
- cdominus
- iaui
- handmethekeysyou
- Jlowen
- broseth
- frogger3d
- ValiantCoward
- skeptclexistence
- lertad
- mizume
- rubadub
- kingmob
- grahamslam
- aaronfr
- schma
- dbot2006
- Torch81
- TheSofaKing
- DigitalDragon5000
- hoihoi8
- ivanpetrov
- Plonq
- daniel1113
- siftbot
x20 - blankfist
who voted against this video qualm
- dw1117
- Fletch
who has this post bookmarked firedoggod
- skeptclexistence
- bluephoenix
- biaozeebub
Ron Paul Runs Rings Around Ignorant Reporter With The Truth Related Videos
| 
Stumble This
Screw Giuliani's uneducated response in the debate.
Screw going to war without congressional approval.
Screw the current state of Republicans and their removal from the foundation of the party.
I've seriously considered registering Republican to vote Ron Paul, so none of the other losers win the primary. While I believe in Paul's foreign policy, I can't agree with how he'll kill many social programs.
How are we ever going to change the status quo unless we stick to our convictions when voting?
Theo,
What social programs would you like to see funded? I'd support you on a re-vamped health care system and real educational opportunities.
Will have to take a closer look at this guy...I like people that can critically think about problems rather than join the lynch mob.
At the core he is for returning control to the states and local government and not letting people representing 49 other states decide what should or shouldn't be done in your state.
Your statement is a most excellent example of fail. People won't vote for Ron Paul not because they won't listen to him, but because they don't agree with him. Don't let opinion polls on the internet fool you. Even though Ron Paul does well on the internet, and libertarians just fall all over him (polls I've seen also indicate that strangely those with libertarian beliefs have a stranglehold on the internet, somehow) the majority of America feels differently.
It's pretty asinine to assume that because people don't agree with *you* that it means that political debate is limited. You seem to suggest that if someone doesn't like Ron Paul or his stance on the issues, it's because they weren't paying attention. No, quite different. Maybe they just disagree with him. As I do. I simply didn't feel the need to say why on videosift, of all places. Somehow you take that and manage to twist it into "limited political debate."
In summary, DIAF. This is one vote that will not be going for Ron Paul and I don't feel I owe you an explanation.
You didn't say "I do not prefer Ron Paul" You said in so many words that Ron Paul supporters are illogical libertarians. So who's applying labels and who's assuming things about people who don't agree with you???
It's obvious that the reporter was attacking him, since everything he said about Ron Paul was negative, and most of us on the internet know that there are a lot of positive things being said about him out there.
That's not "balanced news", CNN. That's more Fox bullshit.
Monkey become defensive when him told he no have choice....so he is given many forms of the same choice, to make him feel better about being hosed.....
Do you think they will ever be able to orchestrate another election, where the monkeys DON'T feel like they have voted for the lesser of many evils??? No. Why should they try? Modern monkeys have been trained to bury any dissent or objections to bullshit, in the nearest hole, and watch TV, and blog, instead of doing anything real......
1. US-backed coups in Iran and many other countries, and other uncouth CIA meddling.
2. US troops in Saudi Arabia, as if ready to make another coup d'etat.
3. US support of Israel
4. Frequent U.S. bombing of Iraq during peacetime.
5. Religious insanity (especially the delusion that there exists an afterlife in which suicide bombers are rewarded, and that sharia law is very opposed to the social liberalism present in all civilized countries.
http://www.ontheissues.org/TX/Ron_Paul.htm
#5, period.
You can come up with all the "reasons" you like, but you'll never justify 9/11 (not that that was your intent). Those people didn't die for any reason, save the insanity of those fuckers flying the planes and the insane religion they follow.
There's a little program called "Hooked on Phonics" you might want to look into. I said "illogically large libertarian population". That means it's illogical that it's so large, not that the people themselves are illogical. 6th grade reading comprehension right there for ya.
BTW, I said it's illogical (and it is) because I've seen a lot of polls taken among internet denizens that indicate libertarians on the net have a majority (I've no doubt they do here at videosift as well) but IRL polls indicate a completely different result. For some reason the internet just seems to attract libertarians much more than other ideologies.
@choggie
Lol, my statement that Ron Paul won't win because people that don't agree with him won't vote for him is bullshit? Perhaps you should check out how elections work again. See, people form an opinion, then they go vote based on that opinion. If Ron Paul doesn't win, it's because people did not choose his set of opinions to represent them. I do not vote for Ron Paul because his opinions do not come close to representing my own. Where's the bullshit again?
Check how Ron Paul is actually doing in the polls. It's a matter of simple math.
I won't respond to the rest of your post since it kind of went into a strange tirade about monkeys and conspiracies that I really don't have time for. And if you were trying to say that the election is going to be rigged I REALLY don't have time to go there.
I can understand your frustration with the proposition, that your vote means dick. It has not for some time, in presidential elections.
And believe it or not, should the candidate win, that is not supposed to (not likely).....Plan B and C are already in place......
There are other bills he has voted NO on not because he personally doesn't agree with what the bill wants to do but because he feels the bill is unconstitutional...that it regards something the Federal Govt has no business getting involved with.
Here is a perfect example of just that.
http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2000/cr040300.htm
of course, if you don't invade their country, smash everthing up, and create the perfect environment for their influence to spread (with #1,#2,#3 and #4) then you would find their tactics a lot less troublesome.
but, oh yeah, there's teh oilzorz factor and teh relekshuns.
like Ron Paul says... why are the US not fighting Putin in Chechnya? Juat answer me that one question without squirming in a sea of apologism.
I hear India's justice system leaves a lot to be desired, shall we go liberate the Indians?
How about that crazy Pakistan president guy with his military uniform?
Come to think of it, how about that Saddam guy...? Remind me why the US gave him so much before hanging him?
Basically, don't be distracted by the Allahu akhbar stuff, any more than i should be distracted by jesus freaks in america.
he is saying that there is a better way to fund "social programs" than making federal diktats.
i kinda agree there.
he is not saying that if you get cancer you have to fuck off and die, he is saying buy health insurance with the money from the job you get because the economy is better because money isn't wasted on inefficient "programs".
so you can disagree with him, but he's not "antisocial", he's a doctor ffs. he just doesn't want money wasted when it could be put to good use. it's an argument about funding method only. he's not saying poor people don't deserve hospitals, he's actually saying poor people would get better hospitals under his system.
it's a hard sell, when people just focus on the deletion of one system and forget that it would be replaced by another, perhaps better system.
i also disagree on his personal abortion stance, but at least he's not proposing banning abortion at the federal level, can't you see that distinction?
i dunno, i'd vote for him just because he has a consistent record and system of beliefs that you can trust, even if you disagree.
but i'm not american, so i can't vote. i am a noncitizen in that particular empire, in an outlying state, a buffer zone between the empire and the russian barbarians. doomed to suffer the consequences of american policy without the power to change it at the ballot box / diebold windows voting machine.
There is only one issue and it would be good if ALL the candidates stick to it.
Do We Stay or Do We Go.