|
| |||||||||||||||
sarah,palin,interview,gibson,bush doctrine,pakistan,chaaaaarlie,does not compute Robot Palin malfunctions under Charlie Gibson's fortitudeRobot Palin malfunctions under Charlie Gibson's fortitudetags:Sarah Palin regurgitates scripted platitudes in her first interview, and then her head almost explodes. All Palin's base are belong to Charles Gibson!
Comments  playlists with this video bullshit by my15minutes
who voted for this video blahpook
- siftbot
x150 - zombieater
- chtierna
who has this post bookmarked Octopussy
Robot Palin Malfunctions Under Charlie Gibson's Fortitude Related Videos
| Watch this Video NextFriends O' the Sift Top New Videos by Vote  Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week Newest Appreciated Comments        | ||||||||||||||
Stumble This
I was worried they'd find a way to make her look credible.
F*ck Palin, F*ck her complete inability to grasp the magnitude of the decision to make pre-emptive strikes against other countries and F*CK anyone who actually considers voting her in as VP.
Matt Damon was right (did i just say that?!)
Palin's one heart attack away from controlling the nukes, and shes as thick as an overgrown potato.
She has really been cramming, you can tell by the way she name-dropped Mikhail Saakashvili (not in this clip) and pronounced it better than I ever would have. That has got to count for something, right? So what if she didn't know about preemption, right... she learned to pronounce a hard name!
It makes a heckuvalot more sense when you realize that Palin, herself, thinks Obama is the better candidate!
I can only hope that the LHC is really some sort of Stargate operated by the NWO/Illuminati/whatever-the-fuck and there are a few of us that get off this rock before the roof caves in on the rest of us...
bullshitpropaganda.Yes ladies and gentlemen, this could someday be the president of the United States, simply because she has a cunt and is willing to sell out her country in standard Republican fashion.
you already look like a clown, for not knowing "the bush doctrine" meant preemption.
not admitting your support for that policy, as well?
makes you a coward.
Heaven help the world if she ever ends up in the president's chair.
CHARLIE!
Min. qualifications for VP --> --------------
Sarah Palin --> --------------
There is no need to say the name of an interviewer over and over.
If she was trying to get manipulative control over charlier, saying his name that many times broke the spell.
Typically you get a good feel from commentors on this site about facts and views. On this specific post it seems like the liberal mindset is overwhelming and ready to fire. I hope it doesn't get worse as this election goes on here. We all need to take a step back and think and stop just reacting, imo.
What kind of moron lists PTA and beauty pageants on their resume or campaign website????? Who BRAGS because they left the country once to go to Kuwait and see some of them "arabs". Yeee-haw. Go shoot some more wolfs and bears. She is like a parody of crazy Bush. Like Bush minus the years of coke and drinking.
>> ^T-man:
Min. qualifications for VP --> --------------
Sarah Palin --> --------------
There is always political posturing when a presidential candidate chooses his (or her) running mate. The choice of Palin was a ridiculous yet brilliant political move. Brilliant that it will mobilize evangelical voters. There are a lot of women voters who feel connected to any female contender. It is brilliant because she distracts everyone - myself included - from the issues that are affecting us now and will continue to for a long time.
The choice of Palin was a blatantly political move. The roster of men and women for McCain to choose from were very experienced. So after 8 years of a misguided war, a huge deficit, falling dollar, many people want someone capable of governing & representing the United States.
I gotta say, I'm not much of a Palin fan, but I thought she answered the questions okay. She didn't answer directly which was a little annoying, but if anything Charlie seemed a bit crude and manipulative with his questions. How about a true neutral look at these people instead this constant media bias for or against someone?
Typically you get a good feel from commentors on this site about facts and views. On this specific post it seems like the liberal mindset is overwhelming and ready to fire. I hope it doesn't get worse as this election goes on here. We all need to take a step back and think and stop just reacting, imo.
boggle.
I gotta say, I'm not much of a Palin fan, but I thought she answered the questions okay.
No, she didn't. Mr. Gibson asked essentially two questions:
- Do you know what the Bush doctrine is?
- Do you agree with it?
She completely failed on the first question as it was blatantly obvious she didn't know the answer. She didn't answer the second question at all, and instead prevaricated using the typical "extremist islamofacsists want to kill you. We can't take any options off the table" line. Saying that doesn't actually mean anything, as it gives no sense whatsoever of her approach to foreign policy. She made some statements indicating that military force would only be used as a last resort, but we've heard that one before - fool me once and all that.
I feel Sarah Palin's selection as VP candidate was both foolhardy and carefully calculated. McCain's people knew he needed the diehard base to win, so they couldn't piss off "values voters" by selecting anyone pro-choice or anything but an evangelical Christian. They also needed to try to woo Hillary supporters, so they needed the VP to be completely penis-free. In that regard, Mrs. Palin is the perfect choice - the more obviously qualified republican women are (as far as I can tell) all pro-choice. The foolhardiness becomes obvious when watching this video, or looking into her qualifications with any sort of critical eye at all - she's just blatantly not a good fit for the job.
I'm not a huge fan of Obama (amongst the initial candidates from the two parties, he would have been probably my fourth or fifth choice), but he has demonstrated some qualities that make him well-suited to the office: thoughtfulness and a solid understanding of the constitution. I'll happily give that a chance after these last 7.5 years.
Shun the non-believer! Shuuuun!
Charlie! Chaaaarlie! Chaaaaaaaaaaarlie!
What does she have to offer again?
This is why Comedy Central and Maher are far more effective vehicles for getting across the message that 'she's ignorant and dangerous' to the average american dolt.
Holy crap, the pessimist in me is scared for November 4th. I saw it once in 2004, when I was certain Bush would lose by a wide majority. I'm actually afraid for this country.
I don't care that she's inexperienced. I care that she's a maverick, like her psycho running mate. BOMB BOMB BOMB, BOMB BOMB IRAN!
miss carolina took evening classes in foreign relationizing.
Why can't we just take all 50 governors and start from there weeding them all down and let 4 or 8 of them run. The 2 top vote winners gets the jobs.
::awaiting flames::
--cribbed from aretheyinsane.org
We all need to take a step back and think and stop just reacting, imo.
There are a lot of Ron Paul folks on here, too, who are not fans of non-answers to straight-forward questions.
How hard is it to say, "Yes, I believe there is a place for the Bush doctrine on the table of the 21st century leaders of the US. The preemptive defense has its detractors, but we have yet to experience anything resembling the attacks of Sept.11th again..."
... that was the crappy Republican answer I expected, but she not only failed to recognize that he was referring to preemptive strategy but tried as hard as she could to not really answer his second question.