Richard Dawkins interviews creationist Wendy Wright
tags:
Stumble ThisThis is a interview from The Genius of Charles Darwin Uncut Interviews.
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
|
| |||||||||||||||
richard dawkins,wendy wright,evolution,creationism,uncut,interview Richard Dawkins interviews creationist Wendy Wright
Comments  who voted for this video Nonbrainwashed
- Kurtz007
- BoneyD
- BreaksTheEarth
- bealsubub
- redyellowblue
- acidSpine
- Stormsinger
- longde
- schmawy
- JAPR
- Fade
- lavoll
- kulpims
- SlipperyPete
- rottenseed
- dystopianfuturetoday
- Haldaug
- NetRunner
- chilaxe
- captmorgano
- lesserfool
- RedSky
- guitarwolf
- fissionchips
- alizarin
- Hex
- smbot31
- eric3579
- EmptyFriend
- arvana
- PunkJay
who has this post bookmarked EDD
Richard Dawkins Interviews Creationist Wendy Wright Related Videos
| Watch this Video NextFriends O' the Sift Top New Videos by Vote                 Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week Newest Appreciated Comments         | ||||||||||||||
Dawkins approaches this interview with the idea to convince someone who is unconvincable about the fact of evolution, which is just not the way to do it - He presents the evidence to her and she simply denies that it even is. Instead, he gets caught in her loopy illogical fallacies.
For example, why didn't he counter her entrapping question of, "Does a completely mentally disabled person have a soul?" with, "Why would a loving god inflict such a condition upon a child?"? The presence of severe disability is not proof that god put a soul in there, it's proof of how inperfect the replication process is and how mutations occur!
These people don't want to use evidence of their own to disprove evolution, all they want to happen is for some seed of doubt to be planted in the minds of the uninformed.
Does he really think it's a rational process that leads someone to believe dogmatically in creationism?
You can't fight someones faith. They take that as an affront to their world views.
Dawkins shouldn't waste time with these nitwits.
We definitely need a "mental illness" channel for these twits. Denial of reality should qualify one for membership.
We already have one:
See "Religion"
This fool woman refuses to look at evidence, but rather thinks that because PEOPLE have made various mistakes (which are corrected later on), science is garbage.
Dawkins shouldn't waste time with these nitwits.
I agree...sometimes a debate is just not possible. Even a debate with a wall would be more worthwhile because at least you'd get that moment after you've said something where you can at least pretend like they're contemplating what you've just said.
Goddam scientists! They're just an exclusionary cult I tell ya!
I'm dumber for it.