pussy,cat,pencil,drawing,time,lapse,timelapse,realistic,realism,photorealism Pussy drawing - Extremely detailed: A time-lapse video

Pussy drawing - Extremely detailed: A time-lapse video

posted by kronosposeidon

1 year 10 months 1 week ago • 6626 views

tags: pussy, cat, pencil, drawing, time, lapse, timelapse, realistic, realism, photorealism

Sorry about the cheap-marketing-ploy title. (Not really.) This guy is wicked with a pencil. From the same guy that wowed us in this video: http://www.videosift.com/video/Photorealistic-pencil-drawing-of-a-watch-A-time-lapse-video

GREAT DESIGNS FROM VIDEOSIFT'S T-SHIRT STORE
Support VideoSift - Buy a Shirt! Use coupon code SIFTFALL09 at checkout to save an additional 20% now!
Let Your Finger Do The Talking	Once I Was Stoned	Hip 2 B Square

Comments

*requeue

written by kronosposeidon

| 1 year 10 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Re-queueing this video for one more try; last queued Saturday, January 5th, 2008 7:25pm PST - requeue requested by submitter kronosposeidon.

written by siftbot

| 1 year 10 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

brilliant

written by swampgirl

| 1 year 10 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I think this might be a underlit overlay, its still pretty impressive, but it doesnt look like he drew it by simply looking at something, you can see it because he gets it all "first try" style. In a "real drawing" you cant really have that kind of precision.

written by BicycleRepairMan

| 1 year 10 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Oh that pussy.

written by ant

| 1 year 10 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

It was promising for about half a second but no

Impeccably detailed, what's the song by the way anyone know?

written by RedSky

| 1 year 10 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

This is no artist. Sorry but recreating a photo is not art. This person is a hack, and there art does not hold up upon close inspection.

written by K0MMIE

| 1 year 10 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Wow my HP all-in-one must be one damn great artist.

He didn't even sketch out the outlines before drawing?? I say underlit too.

written by Abducted

| 1 year 10 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Bah! Haters again like the last video. It may be underlit but even so, I do know people who can do this sort of thing. They don't draw any frameworks because its all in their head.

K0MMIE: never say anything isn't art. It is art whether you like it or not and when a room with a flickering lightbulb can be called a work of art you can hardly complain about a technical work like this. Sadly no one seems interested in technical ability any more, hence why people like Hurst can get away with not lifting a finger to make "works of art" that sell for millions.

written by cobalt | 1 year 10 months ago | CH

▲ 3 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I did a lot of pencil and ink. I always felt like a "copier" because I had to see it to draw it. I don't think extreme detail on the micro looks real on the macro. In other words, you step back 8 feet from an extremely detailed drawing and it doesn't look quite right. You step back 8 feet from a Rembrandt and you see all this lush detail. You look at the painting from 12 inches and you see it's all globs of paint with no detail at all. That's an artist!

On the other hand, random splatters on a canvas, without any form at all, does nothing for me. Someone once described it as" a product of the untalented, sold by the unscrupulous, to the utterly bewildered."

written by 8777

| 1 year 10 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)