|
| |||||||||||||||
Mythbusters,turd,poop,polish,hikaru,dorodango Mythbusters Turd Polishing - Full ClipMythbusters Turd Polishing - Full Cliptags:After seeing Hive13's post (http://www.videosift.com/video/You-can-t-polish-a-turd-actually-you-can), I decided I had to see the rest of the clip. For those like me, here is the entire turd-polishing clip from Mythbusters. Not a dupe because this is the full clip.
Comments  playlists with this video Funny Stuff by R0SENCRANTZ
• Cool neat fun! by marinara
who voted for this video 13150
- siftbot
x38 - darkrowan
- Hex
- marinara
- ant
- Fusionaut
- EndAll
- deathcow
- rubadub
- kwaran
- Stingray
- cyberwire
- Duckman33
- BreaksTheEarth
- Sigh
- heathen
- MarineGunrock
- budzos
Mythbusters Turd Polishing - Full Clip Related Videos
| Watch this Video NextFriends O' the Sift Top New Videos by Vote  Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week Newest Appreciated Comments | ||||||||||||||
Stumble This
This is insane... Do we really need two mythbusters poop clips? One is 3min, this one is 10min.
At 12/4 7:33pm I posted a link to the full version and suggested swapping out that embed.
12 hours later this was posted as a NEW submission.
Why can't we just improve the existing submissions without all this B.S. bloat. Dude, if you got a better embed, then send a link to the original submitter.
"Not a dupe because this is the full clip." lol.. Not technically, but still pretty lame.
At any rate, it will only be a week or three before Discovery has all these pulled from YT for DMCA violations.
You already answered your own question, so why this? Maybe it is lame, but what's even lamer is this * discuss. There's already ample precedent for significantly longer clips not being considered dupes. The original was three minutes, and this one is ten minutes. That's seven minutes longer. That's
over300%+ the original length. That's good enough for me, and it has withstood the smell test for dupitude for similar cases.Case closed. *return.
The point is that the original submission should have just been editted as I suggested. I think original poster probably would have. We should DELETE one of them though.
There is ample precedent of longer, more complete videos being used and discarding the shorter subset videos.
*discuss
If the two sifters could settle it - out of court - and just kill one, that would certainly work too.
As far as long versus short, we've done it both ways in the past here. Just because YOU think this should be deleted doesn't make it right.
Fine. I'll ask an admin what's right. I'll abide by his decision with no complaint if he favors you. Can you do the same thing if he takes my side? Quit being such a WATB.
These two are essentially the same video, one with more detail. I just don't see the need for both videos. I always thought longer videos take over when the shorter video is not just highlight, edits, or something. *return
Also, joedirt, you need to lighten up a bit. A lot actually.