Mitchell and Webb - God asks for sacrifice

Giant see-through George Lucas has a great idea!
HaleyCanesays...

>> ^westy:
I find this offensive can we ban arghness for posting it ?


now do you find it offensive because you believe in god and that is not how he should be portrayed? or offensive because god is white like most people see him as??

spoco2says...

>> ^rottenseed:
>> ^chilaxe:
Circumcision is actually a really great idea.

Dude when I found out circumcision removed skin that made it very pleasurable for the male during sex, I was pissed.
and now you know I'm circumcised...


That is disputed. I haven't found there to be consensus that circumcision actually makes any difference to feeling during sex.

arghnesssays...

I can understand to some extent getting circumcised for religious reasons, although it does seem to conflict with the belief in not having "gashes in your flesh" or "incise any marks on yourselves" that prevents orthodox Jews from getting piercings and tattoos.

I don't understand Americans (and possibly other countries?) generally getting circumcised at birth as a matter of course. Most of the excuses given seem to have little/no evidence -- there's probably more evidence to promote removing tonsils and appendix at birth instead.

sholesays...

^ That is disputed.

disputed my ass
when skin is covered from direct contact, it stays/becomes more sensitive
the glans and the 'rolling over' shaft skin are noticably more sensitive
naturally it's impossible to measure this during sex by other than longevity due to.. well, being distracted

ponceleonsays...

Wouldn't the only way to know for sure if circumcision made it less pleasurable is to get someone who is sexually active and who ISN'T circumcised and then do the procedure to them? After all, you either are or you aren't. Those who are will never know what it would have been like if they weren't and those who aren't will likely NOT want it done to them.

jwraysays...

>> ^ponceleon:
Wouldn't the only way to know for sure if circumcision made it less pleasurable is to get someone who is sexually active and who ISN'T circumcised and then do the procedure to them? After all, you either are or you aren't. Those who are will never know what it would have been like if they weren't and those who aren't will likely NOT want it done to them.


That still wouldn't be adequately controlled to make it comparable. People change over time, and babies heal more quickly/fully.

Paybacksays...

>> ^rottenseed:
>> ^chilaxe:
Circumcision is actually a really great idea.

Dude when I found out circumcision removed skin that made it very pleasurable for the male during sex, I was pissed.
and now you know I'm circumcised...


Why would being able to avoid orgasm for longer, thereby increasing your partner's enjoyment, make you pissed?

Selfish bastard.

spoco2says...

>> ^shole:
^ That is disputed.
disputed my ass
when skin is covered from direct contact, it stays/becomes more sensitive
the glans and the 'rolling over' shaft skin are noticably more sensitive
naturally it's impossible to measure this during sex by other than longevity due to.. well, being distracted


Back that up with any sort of research?

And I have to say mine is plenty damn sensitive enough without a foreskin, so I'd hate to know how sensitive you think it'd be if I had one.

Also, as for the comment saying that it's done 'as a matter of course'. It certainly used to, hence why I am, but not any more, at least not in Australia. You really have to push really hard to get it done here, in fact most doctors in most hospitals won't do it. So, it has indeed fallen away as a 'standard thing' to do.

I give it little thought really, I am... it is what it is. None of my kids are, because there was no reason to do so.

lavollsays...

bah, i have better sex than any of you on here, and I have not had the snip of my penis cut off. theres nothing but old superstition as reasons for having it done with no basis in real medicine.
women who are circumcised are also the strongest advocates for female circumsition...

westysays...

If you have been circumcised you are at a disadvantage to non circomsized when it comes to sexual function.

1) the for skin behaves rather like lubrication once the penis is within the vagina the 4 skin allows the penis to move freely , Manny women only get wet at the beginning of intercourse and cannot maintain the required amount of lubrication to stop potentially harmful rubbing,

2) men are designed to ejaculate when the skin withdraws and exposes the glans within the vagina, men with a 4 skin have a larger likely hood of being able to control the point of climax as they can contole whether the glans are fully exposed or not during intercourse.

3) there is a good argument that the glans become desensitized after circumcision due to the glands abnormally being exposed to rubbing on clothes and that the body becomes used to the sensation of the glans being exposed.

4) with a normal penis when you masturbate you do not need to use lubricant , there is a good reason why the guy i live with who has Jewish parents has 3 bottles of baby oil in his room.


The only time sum one should be circumcised is if they suffer from Phimosis or Paraphimosis. Interestingly Paraphimosis can be caused by circumcision as well as infection and the fact that anny sergery that is not required is a bad idea as all sergary has risks associated with it.


The only rational argument i have heard for circumcision is the cleanliness argument. however this only stands if the male is incapable of washing themselves a minimum of once every 4 days or maby has diabetes or a Urinary-tract-infection , has allergies to condoms, wants to use lubricant bit has allergies to that , has skin conditions, as these can all lead to Balanitis (an inflammation of the end of the penis)


In the end its better to have a for skin , its not the end of the world to not have one , but its definatly better to have one ,

Think of it as a car with a convertible roof verses the same car with a solid top.

westysays...

It amazes me that some of the American women i have talked to seem shocked an repulsed by a penis with 4 skin , evan though its the default position in nature and they are the same women to eat organic and use "natural" products.

dagsays...

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

I've been under the impression for a long time - that women prefer "uncut". At least in the femme erotica I've read- they always make a point about it. Perhaps it's my own complex showing through as I am ... cut.

Discuss...

🗨️ Emojis & HTML

Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.

Possible *Invocations
discarddeadnotdeaddiscussfindthumbqualitybrieflongnsfwblockednochannelbandupeoflengthpromotedoublepromote

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More