McCain Debates Self on Bush, Loses
tags:The green screen edit I've been waiting for.

|
| |||||||||||||
McCain,bush,green screen,jed report McCain Debates Self on Bush, Loses
playlists with this video war is peace by guessandcheck
• McCain vs. McCain by winkler1
who voted for this video theaceofclubz
- siftbot
x121who has this post bookmarked ElessarJD
- poolcleaner
McCain Debates Self On Bush, Loses Related Videos
| Watch this Video NextFriends O' the Sift Top New Videos by Vote Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week Newest Appreciated Comments | ||||||||||||
Now that is exactly what you want to be saying if you yourself are trying to get Americans to believe something you know is false. This is textbook psychology 101.
where would modern politics be without youtube and empowered constituents with basic editing skills?
8 more years of Republican rule, 100 years of war in Iraq, and war with Iran, Syria, Russia and China.
>> ^guessandcheck:
8 more years of Republican rule, 100 years of war in Iraq, and war with Iran, Syria, Russia and China.
All of which are still possible. I shudder to think of what the world would look like with another 8 years of Republican rule.
I actually didn't really get the point of the vid... One one hand he's saying he disagrees with Bush and on the other, he's saying it's not right for Obama to use the term Bush/McCain in describing his policies (or 3rd Bush term). Why are these arguments contrary (which I assume was the point the vid was trying to make )?
Have I missed something?
I await the flames for this comment but... Have I missed something?
Yes.
It isn't enough to just listen and blindly agree. What matters is whether one can listen, comprehend, and analyze what is being said.
Sit down. Relax. Open the ears. Turn on the light bulb in your head... and listen to each and every word said. Exercise that brain.
Oh Meet the Press... thanks, Mr. Russert. You'll be missed.
Wrong sift?
http://www.videosift.com/video/Tom-Brokaw-Reporsts-on-the-death-of-Tim-Russert
I actually didn't really get the point of the vid... One one hand he's saying he disagrees with Bush and on the other, he's saying it's not right for Obama to use the term Bush/McCain in describing his policies (or 3rd Bush term). Why are these arguments contrary (which I assume was the point the vid was trying to make )?
Have I missed something?
Yes, you have missed something. He says that his opponents are saying that voting for him is just the same as voting for Bush because they are so alike. In the speech he's making in front of the green screen he's trying to say that he's different to Bush, that you're voting for another man entirely, not the same at all.
And yet, from a prior interview, as showed in the green screen insert, we see that he has been, and has stated that he has been, pretty much bang on exactly the same as Bush in all policies that make sense.
He is Bush in another guise, and if anyone votes the dithering old fool in, the ol' US of A is doomed.
Yes.
FAILING SCHOOLS
PROHIBITIVELY EXPENSIVE HEALTHCARE