McCain Can't Recall Iran-Contra

published by dystopianfuturetoday

2 months 1 week ago • 1200 views

tags: mccain, reagan, iran contra, iran, nicaragua, terrorism, american terrorism, jed report

playlists (0)

You should also watch
“McCain attacks Obama over Iran comments”

Comments

Wow.

Undoubtedly, no one in the press will pick this up or follow-through.

In his book, 1984, George Orwell said "He who controls the past controls the future." Well, that applies if no one but a YouTube member bothers to do a little digging.

written by shuac

| 2 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 5 ▼ | flag spam (0)

To believe a man who's memory is *that flaky required faith...

or maybe its just better to pretend that Reagan delivered American Justice(TM) rather than arms...either way...its not what happened, so pork pies and fat *lies

written by Zonbie

| 2 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Adding video to channels (Lies) - requested by Zonbie.

written by siftbot

| 2 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Wow, this was sort of big news, and more generally common knowledge of what happened while I was growing up. Arms for hostages, admitted and truth, much to our shame. What is Mccain doing here? Can he seriously not remember, or is it flat-out retelling the story in a better light? From the way he's telling the story, it sounds like Reagan went in with a pistol in each hand to bring those men and women out.

written by ShakyJake

| 2 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 3 ▼ | flag spam (0)

McCain is consciously performing GWB. Listen to his tone of voice and pattern of speech. Heard it before? lol.

written by qualm

| 2 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I am not a McCain fan, but I have to respond to this. These are two DIFFERENT hostage situations. The one that McCain is referring to is the embassy hostage situation that was resolved the day Reagan took office in 1981. The Iran-Contra affair was about American hostages in Lebanon under the control of Hezbollah who were ransomed with weapons trans-shipped through Israel. Now, while there is deep speculation that the first hostage situation--our embassy staff taken in Tehran when Carter allowed the deposed Shah into the U.S. for cancer treatments--was resolved because of some back-channel dealings, including a rumor that George H.W. Bush went to Paris and met with Iranians to STALL the release of the hostages until after the U.S. election of 1980, these are two completely different situations. The first took place in 1981, the second in 1985/6. So McCain is technically right.

written by Biminim

| 2 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 6 ▼ | flag spam (0)

^Biminim:^

Does that mean that the situation McCain is referring to was actually a problem solved by Jimmy Carter and not Reagan at all?

written by Ryjkyj

| 2 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Terrorists' pure fear of Republican presidents must be why Reagan had to sell weapons to Iran to free a new set of hostages in the Iran-Contra affair a couple of years after the Iran hostage crisis, and why the 9-11 attack occurred under Bush's presidency.

McCain:"[Reagan] didn't sit down and face negotiations with the religious extremists in Tehran." Seems like McCain is indeed not remembering things correctly.

written by chilaxe

| 2 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Tags for this video have been changed from 'mccain, reagan, iran contra, iran, nicaragua, terrorism, american terrorism' to 'mccain, reagan, iran contra, iran, nicaragua, terrorism, american terrorism, jed report' - edited by kronosposeidon

written by siftbot

| 2 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

For a quick sing-along review on Iran/Contra, for all you youngsters out there, see also http://www.videosift.com/video/Ollie-North-High-Treason

User Biminim is otherwise right, Iran/Contra was not directly related to the hostage issue McBane was talking about. Though it was extra embarrassing for Reagan when it was revealed that his administration was secretly helping the Iranian bugaboos after his supporters had assigned him so much credit for strong arming the earlier hostage release--especially when it was actually so obvious that that release had nothing to do with Reagan, who had taken office just days before.

[edit: removed bogus, unresearched comments concerning Bush Sr. (thanks T-man...)]

written by wazant

| 2 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

George H.W. Bush wasn't CIA director when these negotiations might have taken place. He left the position when Carter took office.

McCain may be surprised to know that the release of the hostages in 1981 was negotiated (and not by Reagan, but Carter) - the results of which were the Algers Accords.

written by T-man

| 2 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)