Is Mirriam-Webster part of the gay agenda?
tags:
Stumble ThisChristian culture warriors uncover a massive conspiracy.
via: PoeTV
via: PoeTV
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
|
| |||||||||||||||
mirriam webster,same sex marriage,marriage equality,gay marriage Is Mirriam-Webster part of the gay agenda?
Comments  who voted for this video dystopianfuturetoday
- Issykitty
- therealblankman
- gwiz665
- qualm
- Hive13
- Zonbie
- berticus
- quantumushroom
- sometimes
- chilaxe
- Zyrxil
- maximillian
- dag
- Lendl
- sweetlime
- Lumm
- charliem
- jacobrecker
- thinker247
- mickd1337
- JiggaJonson
- deputydog
- zombieater
- ponceleon
- Kevlar
- crotchflame
- Skeeve
- MaxWilder
- Edeot
- HollywoodBob
- RhesusMonk
- blankfist
- Ornthoron
- Kerotan
- JAPR
- chrisyf
Is Mirriam-Webster Part Of The Gay Agenda? Related Videos
| Watch this Video NextFriends O' the Sift Top New Videos by Vote                 Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week 14. Seric
(141 votes) Newest Appreciated Comments        | ||||||||||||||
A property arrangement in which a father sells his daughter to an unrelated man in exchange for the social gain associated with the familial connection, and dependent on the culture and status of those involved, sometimes including other property such as a dowry or a bride price.
Main Entry:
big·ot
Pronunciation:
\ˈbi-gət\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
French, hypocrite, bigot
Date:
1660
: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices ; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance
poop.
the music is hilarious
I'm going to miss paper money. Obama's scamulus is turning every dollar into 15 cents.
Marriage relativism: a skateboard is equal to a car and a car to a jet. Hey, they're all just transportation!
Maybe we should go back the old definition:
A property arrangement in which a father sells his daughter to an unrelated man in exchange for the social gain associated with the familial connection, and dependent on the culture and status of those involved, sometimes including other property such as a dowry or a bride price.
Cmon QM, reply to this.
Sorry, but a *person* has considerably more value than any object. Be it billfold, mode of transportation, or even unjust, unfair, bigoted laws. Blacks are people. Native Americans are people. Women are people. Unfortunately for the backwards people believing in a book promoting infanticide, genocide, slavery, incest, and cowardice (I'd call handing over your virgin daughter to appease a mob cowardice), GAYS are people as well.
They can fight all they want, but progress *will* happen no matter how they oppose it. I suppose we'll have to put up with their weeping and gnashing of teeth through it all though.
QM caries around several billfolds to keep his denominations separate but equal. --Funny.
I'm going to miss paper money. Obama's scamulus is turning every dollar into 15 cents.
Shit! Shit! Shit! Ok, don't panic... uh... bring up the stimulus! Ha! They won't expect that!
A property arrangement in which a father sells his daughter to an unrelated man in exchange for the social gain associated with the familial connection, and dependent on the culture and status of those involved, sometimes including other property such as a dowry or a bride price.
As archaic (or not, since there are still child brides in some Muslim countries) as arranged marriages were/are for power , they were still between a man and a woman (or women). Even societies that either were indifferent to homosexuality or--in the weakest form of approval--looked the other way, never condoned gay marriage.
Men and women are not interchangeable, there are real differences between the sexes.
And for the trendy religion-bashers, Christianity has given more good to the world than it has taken, and done far less evil than communism, socialism and fascism.
As archaic (or not, since there are still child brides in some Muslim countries) as arranged marriages were/are for power , they were still between a man and a woman (or women).
No, these were arrangements between two men, a father and a husband, concerning a piece of property, a bride. Women were not legal persons, and could not enter into such a contract in most cases. The fact that the husband has sex with the property exchanged does not change who entered into the contract, two men.
Even societies that either were indifferent to homosexuality or--in the weakest form of approval--looked the other way, never condoned gay marriage.
Nobody wanted "gay marriage" by the old definition, since the bride is property, no such analog was desirable. Marriage has been redefined, very recently, to be a contract between legal persons which confers benefits. The folks who are complaining about "redefinition" have benefited from their redefinition, and now they want to set it in stone, and pretend it has always been that way.
If they could provide any evidence that this redefinition is more socially destructive than the redefinition they have been using, let them state their case. The fact that the creator of the video don't seem to have an argument beyond "redefinition conspiracy", and seems to be completely ignorant of the historical context, does not speak well for the position.
Hell, at least Racial discrimination is against the law, there's nothing to protect anyone from sexual discrimination for the most part. Technically speaking, a black man actually has MORE rights than a gay person in this country. The idea that the people voting for Prop 8 were perfectly happy with neo-nazi skinhead aryan brotherhood supporting bigots getting married... but not gays. Surely not.
Any hateful, despicable, murderous, thieving, corruptible, deceitful, lying, scum of the earth poor excuse for a human being... ANY of them can get married assuming they can find a woman/man of the opposite sex who can put up with it. I'd say anyone fitting the above description getting married is a MUCH larger "threat" to marriage than any amount of gay love. No gay marriage wouldn't be perfect either, but at least it would be equal. And for proponents of so called civil unions, I refer you back to Separate But Equal. It was bigotry then, it's bigotry now, just a new name.
a lot of things aren't what they seem. shit i left the vaporizer on.
Men and women are not interchangeable, there are real differences between the sexes.
There sure are. And that's why I like the noises my girlfriend makes in bed MUCH better than anything that ever came out of my ex-boyfriends.
... pun intended.