Iraq war draft?
tags:
Stumble ThisNobody likes the idea of being drafted... however if the fight in Baghdad will continue for years to come then it would be inevitable.
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
|
| |||||||||||||||
possible,war,draft,soon Iraq war draft?
Comments  playlists with this video Politica2007 by Farhad2000
• Mess-O-Potamia by raven
who voted for this video Constitutional_Patriot
- BillOreilly
- Farhad2000
- firefly
- bluecliff
- UsesProzac
- Kurtz007
- persephone
- qruel
- joedirt
- codenazi
- ant
- Sketch
- Structure
- dotdude
- oblio70
- calvados
- jonb42
- pho3n1x
- BoneyD
- raven
- siftbot
who voted against this video gorgonheap
Iraq War Draft? Related Videos
| Watch this Video NextFriends O' the Sift Top New Videos by Vote                 Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week 12. dan00108
(171 votes) Newest Appreciated Comments        | ||||||||||||||
But for the middle class and the kids of the Congress, and the Pentagon, and the White House, they’re not involved. So you find a situation where people support the war, but not my kids."
- Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY)
Islamofascists, moon-worshipping, death-cult fanatics they are, will nonetheless remain a relentless enemy, perhaps for decades. They are spread across a wide swath of countries.
Victicrats like Rangel do what they do best, trying to make everything about race and class. Funny then that the Clintons, who so badly need the support of teachers' unions, didn't send Chelsea to a government school. Guess that whole "hypocrisy" thing is universal.
As 9-11 proved, if you're an American, you're already in the war, right here at home. Your morale, knowledge of history and basic survival preparedness are all vital to the survival of the Republic.
You first, asshole.
And you can prove it by recounting how many times you've been attacked in your neighborhood the past year compared to the "terrorists" in bad evil "islamo-fascist" Baghdad.
You're a chump.
Once we figure out your stupidity gene, the world will bloom.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,2147052,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront
With the U.S army in this state I wouldn't be surprised.
What? Are you accusing the Clintons of hypocrisy? How dare you defame the names of such honest and upright souls!
"And you can prove it by recounting how many times you've been attacked in your neighborhood the past year compared to the "terrorists" in bad evil "islamo-fascist" Baghdad."
Ah, the liberal mindset in all its glory. Well done, young one, you are truly a shining beacon for the others here on VS and the world at large.
"
Anyway
The opinion of a few people does not a law make.
Barring a World War-scaled event, there will be no draft. People (Democrats especially) love to bring this up now and then to make political statements. Hot air.
Dem: "You evil conservatives and your illegal war is forcing us to start the draft"
Pentagon: "No it's not... noob."
But for the middle class and the kids of the Congress, and the Pentagon, and the White House, they’re not involved. So you find a situation where people support the war, but not my kids."
- Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) }}
This is a very common and completely ignorant argument. It assumes that every person who supports the war in question is heartless and selfish, having no care whatsoever the cost of said war. This assumption is just foolish. It also assumes that the alternative to fighting is better. The whole basis for supporting a war is the belief that NOT fighting would be worse than fighting and that the price for NOT fighting would be higher than fighting. That statement alone makes this Senator's argument moot.
It also argues that no one is allowed to support a war unless he enlists in the army, but everyone is perfectly allowed to oppose that war free-of-guilt even if opposing that war is wrong or irresponsible. Anyone with any sense knows this is a transparent double-standard, in other words, a lame argument. Try again Mr. Rangel.
rotflmao.
you call it war because there's never been a war inside your country. Well, apart from civil war. But that's absolutely not the same as having strangers bombing your buildings, or taking your fellow citizens to prison camp.
this kind of statement simply makes me laugh.
I normally stay out of the pure politics threads, don't even read them just for this reason, but I saw this quote in recent comments and can't help it here.
We lost once the recounts were done just about 3k people on 9-11. Each and every year, every one, we lose MORE to accidental drowning.
http://www.allcountries.org/uscensus/135_deaths_and_death_rates_from_accidents.html
I'm sorry and I don't mean to minimize what happened, it was as severe a crime as could have happened but they can't destroy us like that. They can propel us toward suicide though and that's exactly what they've done. The real threat is from those who want to turn us into an authoritarian regime over it and they can destroy us from within.
If each and every year without exception another 9-11 happened accidental drowning would STILL be a bigger real world risk than death by domestic terrorism would have been, but it doesn't happen that often. Only happened once. Yeah, I expect it or something similar or bigger probably will again sometime, how else can they keep us on the path toward sure suicide? But I've also no doubt they'll be but a pin prick when history is done telling the tale, the damage will be mostly self inflicted.
9-11 changed nothing. Our reaction to it, panic and our willingness to sell our futures for momentary illusions of safety did. We're no safer now, we're less so. Just more scared.
We might as well bring up civil war while we are at it. <- An extreme Possibility. Much like the draft.
I signed up for the Selective Service, But ill be damned if I fight in a war that I do not agree with. It better be another Nazi Germany that is killing /b or Im not going.