*eia for blocking a fire exit and for parking at heavy object on a floor that was not necessarily zoned for such purposes. They don't seem to be on the 'ground' floor and people design space under flooring all the time; how do they know the car wouldn't have crashed through?
>> ^longde: eia for blocking a fire exit and for parking at heavy object on a floor that was not necessarily zoned for such purposes. They don't seem to be on the 'ground' floor and people design space under flooring all the time; how do they know the car wouldn't have crashed through?
I'd say that's a bit trigger happy on the eia. Calling it evolution in action because it's blocking an exit on the chance that the place catches on fire and kills someone is a wee bit of a stretch, no? All videos on the sift would be eia if we applied 'what if' scenarios.. A meteor strike's overdue.. that's evolution for you.
Seeing as people aren't complete morons most of the time I'd venture a guess that they gave some (just a bit) thought to the safety of the 'stunt' before pulling it.
The car also only weighs around 2,390 lbs (1,084 kg) and if the floor won't hold that (split over four points as well) the architect needs to get back to the drawing board.
>> ^lampishthing: No way this is eia. It would be eia if it had crashed through the floor and he'd been maimed/killed.
EIA here on the sift doesn't really have any specific definition. It's just people doing stupid or dangerous things. I always thought it could stand to be tightened up a bit, even more so now that it has so much overlap with #fail.
Is playing russian roulette eia, if you don't get shot?
probably a max of 700 lbs per front tire... that floor isnt safe to walk on if it cant support that little car
Is exposing oneself and others to high risk being eia? Or only having the consequences of recklessness happen?
Is playing russian roulette eia, if you don't get shot?
No, when someone stupid survives doing something stupid, that is a case of evolution neglecting to act.
eia for blocking a fire exit and for parking at heavy object on a floor that was not necessarily zoned for such purposes. They don't seem to be on the 'ground' floor and people design space under flooring all the time; how do they know the car wouldn't have crashed through?
I'd say that's a bit trigger happy on the eia. Calling it evolution in action because it's blocking an exit on the chance that the place catches on fire and kills someone is a wee bit of a stretch, no?
Seeing as people aren't complete morons most of the time I'd venture a guess that they gave some (just a bit) thought to the safety of the 'stunt' before pulling it.
The car also only weighs around 2,390 lbs (1,084 kg) and if the floor won't hold that (split over four points as well) the architect needs to get back to the drawing board.
No way this is eia. It would be eia if it had crashed through the floor and he'd been maimed/killed.
EIA here on the sift doesn't really have any specific definition. It's just people doing stupid or dangerous things. I always thought it could stand to be tightened up a bit, even more so now that it has so much overlap with #fail.