Conservapedia,Homosexuality,Young Turks,Conservatives,Wikipedia Have You Ever Heard Of Conservapedia?

Have You Ever Heard Of Conservapedia?

posted by GreatBird

2 years ago • 4168 views

tags: Conservapedia, Homosexuality, Young Turks, Conservatives, Wikipedia

Cenk Uygur from the Young Turks points out the differences in Wikipedia and Conservapedia.

GREAT DESIGNS FROM VIDEOSIFT'S T-SHIRT STORE
Support VideoSift - Buy a Shirt! Use coupon code SIFTXMAS09 at checkout to save an additional 20% now!
Atheism For Lent	Cognitive Dissonance	Power Turns Me On

Comments

I smell top 15 buddy.

written by rottenseed

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I love Conservapedia's slogan: The Trustworthy Encyclopedia.

And the Breaking news on their site at the moment, "Hillary is plummeting!" doesn't seem biased at all. I mean seriously, at least lost the Exclamation Point there Fox n-- I mean Convervapedia.

written by omnistegan | 2 years ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Where do they get those stats?
I can't see top visited pages on http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page

written by yaroslavvb | 2 years ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

. . . . It's painful to read that site. My heart sinks when I think that people really believe that dinosaurs and humans coexisted only 6,000 years ago and that dragons are real (didn't know dinosaurs breathed fire) and that evolution is debunked because my kid didn't pop out as a new species or that monkey's aren't giving birth to 6 foot tall humans. Or, yes, that the asteroid had NOTHING to do with the decline of dinosaurs even though they admit that the period afterwards shows a serious decline in fossils but I guess it shouldn't matter because technically, most of them don't believe in carbon dating. But hey, I don't believe in popcorn.

written by shatterdrose

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 11 ▼ | flag spam (0)

http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Statistics

written by dag

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 7 ▼ | flag spam (0)

^hahaha! Homosexuality is now above the main page!

written by rottenseed

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Merge this video and this - http://www.videosift.com/video/Middle-SexesRedefining-He-and-She video together and you have a winner.

written by RedSky

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Repubicans?

written by Babymech

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I found it interesting to compare the entries for Left Wing and Right Wing

written by BoneyD

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I was really hoping this was a parody, I was really hoping that it was fake. Now my soul has died a little more to where ill have to watch the cats&dogs channel for the next hour just so i dont kill myself

written by 9058

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 4 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Conservapedia is hilarious. They go way beyond the far right and way into completely delusional. I don't think any of the conservatives I know would view Conservapedia content as valuable.

I'm really tempted to make an account and see what kind of nonsense I can get their editors to "approve".

written by xxovercastxx

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 4 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Ok, no... I've got a better idea. I want to start a "Homosexuality and Catholic Priests" page.

written by xxovercastxx

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 5 ▼ | flag spam (0)

With quality programming like this doofus, no wonder "AA" is bankrupt.

written by quantumushroom

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

seriously... everyone needs to compare the entries for left wing and right wing-- pure comedy gold right there.

written by enon | 2 years ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

After following Dag's link it seems #10 is now "Homosexuality and Scotland".

written by 8383

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

MG = Republican
I would never go there for information. Pure garbage.
But the left/right pages were hilarious.

written by MarineGunrock

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 3 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I want to add a "Homosexuality and Fashion" section.

p.s., girl-on-girl is not so hot if they're... obese! http://www.conservapedia.com/Lesbianism

written by bamdrew

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Pure comedy gold. Anybody want to add it to the comedy section?

written by thinker246

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

They should consider renaming it to Homosexualitypedia...

written by maatc

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

.. Because all "leftists" want to burn down churches and resurrect the Soviet Union?

That's crazy... we all saw it didn't work! The changes need to be made quicker and with less people in power. Preferably only 1 ruler until the communist party has been elected. And this time those who don't work will be sent to labor camps.
What more... Oh ye, GAY MARRIAGE!

written by Abducted

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Hahaha, the Conservapedia "Left Wing" and "Right Wing" articles are awesome! Cannot read one without reading the other. (I would suggest reading the "Left Wing" entry first).

written by Throbbin

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

BEST ARTICLE: Homosexuality and the Nazi Party

Linked from the article on the "Homosexual Agenda."

Don't even try to top that - it's too perfect.

written by karaidl

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

There's also a Liberapedia, liberapedia.com, but it's a joke website.

Read this article:

http://liberapedia.com/index.php?title=Jesus

written by Fjnbk

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

As a PaleoConservative (i.e.: Libertarian), just from listening to you all and watching this video - I don't want to visit such a site. It sounds like another (to use their term) wacktard or loon Neocon designed website.

My god, the Neocons are certifiably insane. Wikipedia rocks and i love how it leaves a trail to who changed what (at least via ip addy).

It's time for Libertarian and Utilitarian rule again in this country. It's been way too long (centuries) since we've had good ppl calling the shots.

On the same note, I really don't like how this show also plays the left vs. right game. People are misled by the political spectrum in mainstream media. Everything is not so left and right. I've heard someone mention that the political spectrum is really a 3D scale and is constantly being oversimplified.

written by Constitutional_Patriot

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Bahaha! Oh, I just wondered what would possibly be there when I clicked on the Lesbian page link for women.

Un-fucking-believable...

written by BoneyD

| 2 years ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Eh, Wikipedia does have a liberal bias. When I tried to put the (verifiable) fact that Joe Wilson (the husband of Valerie Plame, and instigator of that whole mess) was part of the Kerry Campaign, it was removed repeatedly as "Well Poisoning". Meaning, of course, that it would give a reader a negative opinion of Wilson as the result of a fact.

Actually, checking the article on Joe Wilson, it's in there now but doesn't appear on any of the related articles on the Plame Affair.

written by ShakaUVM | 1 year 12 months ago | CH

▲ -2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

ShakaUVM - wow, there's undeniable proof that wikipedia is liberal. You nailed it buddy. And we all know "that it would give a reader a negative opinion of Wilson as the result of a fact". That must be it.

written by Throbbin

| 1 year 12 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

The internet in general has a huge liberal bias.

written by dystopianfuturetoday

| 1 year 12 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I wish more conservatives were like MGR and Ron Paul. Democrats have begun to take their party back. Republicans should do the same.

written by dystopianfuturetoday

| 1 year 12 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

While funny, it's hard to actually make fun of them for their seemingly homosexual, ummm, tendancies (i suppose that would be the word) that they have over their at conservapedia. Seeing as how anybody can edit the articles, they could just be an immature joke (though unlikely given their prevelance throughout so many articles) and the attention drawn to these particular articles probably has a lot of random people looking at them. It's kind of like getting the chance to read Charles Manson's diary. What are these psychos REALLY thinking about all day? Well, "homos" apparently : )

written by 12032

| 1 year 5 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Submit Comment

Connect with Facebook

- OR -

playlists with this video

socio-asthetic by smibbo

who voted for this video

enon - GreatBird

- jimnms

- siftbot