Exactly! This is what I was saying.... (all for the big $$$)

they don't actually debunk anything other then One fact. otherwise it's just an attack on a guy thats trying to raise awareness. it's currently 10c here in Toronto. in feb.

Check the sources and make your own judgments.

Here are a few:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Patrick_J._Michaels

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tim_Ball

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_R._Christy

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Christopher_C._Horner

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Competitive_Enterprise_Institute

etc, etc, etc,

>> ^vaporlock:
Check the sources and make your own judgments.
Here are a few:

Thanks. My judgement is that your links are from an unreliable and demonstrably biased source.

Criticism of SourceWatch
SourceWatch has a generally liberal and left-wing outlook on issues, and most of the project's investigative and critical articles are aimed and directed at what SourceWatch perceives to be prominent conservatives, those that are right-of center and Republican Party organizations and individuals.

Sourcewatch has been criticised by conservatives and opponents of environmentalism for its political stance. Alan Caruba, who describes himself as a critic of "environmental propaganda' writes "Source Watch is a project of the Center of Media & Democracy, a left-wing organization that devotes a lot of time to attacking the public relations profession in general and conservative writers in particular."[4].


http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/SourceWatch

Moving this video to mharvey42's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

It really has become a religion...