Fox and Friends call for havoc in Iran
tags:
Stumble This"One thing could we do, could we start arming the anti government groups inside Iran, could their cars start blowing up inside Iran, like our humvees are blowing up, maybe inside Tahran so they wont be doing it inside Baghdad?"
After "weather problems"
"These militant groups are as upset about the direction of the Iranian government almost as much as the United States is, we are not doing enough to arm them to support them and let them create havoc inside Iran"
After "weather problems"
"These militant groups are as upset about the direction of the Iranian government almost as much as the United States is, we are not doing enough to arm them to support them and let them create havoc inside Iran"
He needs to find out who it was who armed Osama and Hussein in the first place...
History certainly dosn't teach us anything about arming insurgency groups, no siry.
how do these bushbabys talk to children. I can see it now, at the dinner table. " hows school son ? Oh is chucky still not acting in the way you want him to? Son people like chucky dont belong in usa. Now after your done eating dont forget to go and pray to your flag. Cuz now Im gona get more drunk and later try to put it in your momas black hole. what dady ? whats a black hole? Never mind son just finish you chicken and go to your flag."
If I could understand what in the world that meant, I'd gladly give an answer...
"Let's just give them a nuke."
Don't give Hillary any ideas.
"how do these bushbabys talk to children."
Well now, that's a marvelous rhetorical question. If it made sense, it would be even more enlightening...
Or we can follow the examples set by Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Truman and Reagan and break out the big stick.
The world isn't fearing crazy Americans like it should. Fear = respect = staying #1.
For those that think Iran is harmless, that's great news! It will make the pilots of the F-22 Raptors we send to take out their military targets more relaxed.
I think your historical references don't really pan out here, Iran has not attacked anyone recently, or seceded from the union.
Incidentally which army are you suggest doing this with? last I checked ours was already deployed beyond capacity.
Now if you are planning on just an unprovoked air-strikes, that sounds brilliant, since we can't back them up on the ground we will just start a war and run home hoping they don't follow us.
Perhaps this is the neo-con plan to hit somebody who can follow us home so the administration can say "see, they are following us home, just like we said". Of course the media will fail to recognize that response to an unprovoked attack on an internationally recognized nation state and "terrorism" are two different things. But I suppose we are used to this, it's like the osama/sadam switcharoo.
Remember the only things Iran is doing "wrong" are things we do all the time
1) talk about destroying other governments, Israel for them, Afghanistan/Iraq/Iran/North Korea for us.
2) developing nuclear capacity, theoretical for them, well developed for us, and we use them on civilians.
3) Providing material support to resistance fighters in other countries, Iraq for them, and just about everywhere else for us.
Iran's crime is that they are too much like the "USA", maybe they are just trying to be "#1"
The truth is we've given them good reasons to hate us, and with all of the administrations threats and posturing, it seems we only want to make things worse. What we desperately need is diplomacy and reconciliation, and instead we reelected a war monger. Like most of the world I'm disappointed in America's actions over the last few years, but we have the opportunity to redeem ourselves by working as hard for peace as we have in the past for war.
I think your historical references don't really pan out here, the US hasn't nuked anyone since World War II. And that was to end a world war, the last time I checked.
"Now if you are planning on just an... air-strikes"
Worked for Bill Clinton, but liberals coveniently forget that...
'Iran's crime is that they are too much like the "USA"'
You're right, they're just like us. Wait... what?
then the middle east and isreal can all go slap each other around while we figure out how baby boomers are going to get social security.
If I could understand what in the world that meant, I'd gladly give an answer..."
Are you serious? What if you were to try really hard. Just sound out the words as you go and take it slow. Oh I get it, he didn't capitalize 'Are' and 'American', I can see now how you could be completely confused about the whole sentence and are unable to make out a single word or derive any kind of meaning.
"2) developing nuclear capacity, theoretical for them, well developed for us, and we use them on civilians."
I think your historical references don't really pan out here, the US hasn't nuked anyone since World War II. And that was to end a world war, the last time I checked.
Since being the operative word.
"Now if you are planning on just an... air-strikes"
Worked for Bill Clinton, but liberals coveniently forget that...
The sixth word in your response is spelled incorrectly. Subsequently I can not understand your entire sentence. Nope, no matter how hard I try I just can't work out what you might have been trying to spell. If only I could work out that sixth word I could read the whole sentence.
"Iran's crime is that they are too much like the "USA"
You're right, they're just like us. Wait... what?
I take it you either missed the point entirely or you have changed your mind?
Your troll-fu is weak, I suggest your not even the real Bill O'reilly!
Umm no, actually the war was over. The Japanese had already agreed to surrender but the "official" surrender ceremony hadn't happened yet, somewhat like the British with Dresden (of course they don't teach any of this ACTUAL history in US classrooms, they prefer the Disney version where everything is black and white).
Intelligent historians all believe that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki had nothing really to do with Japan, it was a warning to the Russians, "We have the bomb and we're not afraid to use it!"
Get YOUR history straight before trying to correct others.
Idiot fundamentalists on both sides.
Intelligent historians all believe that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki had nothing really to do with Japan, it was a warning to the Russians, "We have the bomb and we're not afraid to use it!"'
And I'm dating Jessica Alba.
"The continent was named after Amerigo Vespucci, and the first recorded settlers (the true discoverers) came tens of thousands of years before."
Tens of thousands of years ago, and it's recorded, eh? Neat! Didn't think that was possible, but neat!