Fox News interviews Diebold voting machine hacker/professor

published by oohahh

1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago • 454 views

tags: diebold, election, voting, fraud, ed felten

bookmarks (0)

You should also watch
“SHOCKER: Rude Fox News Interview w/ Naomi Wolfe”

Comments

This video is a response to "Hack a US Election in 3 E-Z steps with your friend Diebold" http://www.videosift.com/story.php?id=10853

written by oohahh

| 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

why did that seem so rushed?

written by pho3n1x

| 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

So they could get to the Diebold guys? Would have liked to see that portion of show.

written by Fletch

| 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

While I appreciate the sentiment, it seems a little too deus ex machina.

written by amxcvbcv

| 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Why would Fox News, which every liberal knows is a shill for conservatives, be doing a FAIR and BALANCED report on these voting machines?

written by quantumushroom

| 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Because this is a gut reaction story. And Fox thrives on stuff like this, that get people rallied up.

written by Farhad2000

| 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Yeah, i also would like to see Diebold's statement to this.

written by skforty | 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

man.. i'd like to be a hacker slash professor someday.

written by Raytrace

| 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

You need a Princeton Professor and two students to confirm that a "computer" voting machine can be hacked? Ok... I don't think anyone here didn't know that*SARCASM On a side not he published his results before they could be looked over for release in a peer reviewed journal. Why, so he could get the publicity before election otherwise his publication would have come out after election and no one would have given a sh!t. I've seen this same story article on all major news networks.

written by zeth_rb | 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

"Flawed voting system?" Yet another example of the news not actually telling us but asking us O_O Soon fox news will give up the charade and just make a current events trivial pursuit game show.

written by archchef

| 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

zeth_rb asked, "You need a Princeton Professor and two students to confirm that a "computer" voting machine can be hacked?"

Yes. There's a difference between stating that something is or isn't true, (i.e., Diebold machines are flawed) and proving that the flaw exists.

written by oohahh

| 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I was being sarcastic oohahh, hence the word sarcasm with an asterik . Did you even read what I said? Also I said that if he wants to publish his findings he has to go through a rigirous process of having his work verified for publication. He went public first to get some attention while voting machines are on peoples minds for the election. Hence whether ir can be verified by his peers as being true.

written by zeth_rb | 1 year 11 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

"if he wants to publish his findings he has to go through a rigirous process of having his work verified for publication. He went public first to get some attention while voting machines are on peoples minds for the election"

/rant_mode 1

Oh, pull yer frickin' head out! These "voting machines" are just motherboards, cpus, memory, and software (or firmware).... same as your daddy's computer that your pecking on now. Any nub with an internet connection can hack it in a couple minutes by d'ling said "virus" and putting it on a bootable SD card (or whatever kind of card the machine accepts). This isn't String Theory, and certainly doesn't need the sort of peer review you are espousing. It's a relatively simple thing to do, and any second-year CS major would understand the method and the programming code used to boot the machine (or "load the virus"). He should be APPLAUDED for "going public", so take your pathetic, nut-job, conspiracy lunacy and call it in to "Fox and Friends" tomorrow morning where there will be an entire audience of lemmings and dittoheads you can impress.

/rant_mode 0

written by Fletch

| 1 year 11 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Wow, did I say that out loud?

Sorry.

written by Fletch

| 1 year 11 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Submit Comment

playlists with this video

Interviews by choggie