Florida Democrats trying their best to not break DNC rules

published by NetRunner

6 months 1 week ago • 513 views

tags: state senate, florida, democrats, oops

comments (7)

embed

bookmarks (0)

playlists (0)

Stumble This

You should also watch
“The Clinton Way: Win Any Way You Can”

Florida Senate Democratic minority leader Steven Geller making a motion to try to keep the Florida primary from being moved up before Feb 5th, and breaking DNC rules.

I think he doth protest too much...

Comments

What an asshole. Hillary won't be able to claim victimhood for Florida Democrats anymore.

written by dystopianfuturetoday

| 6 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Video tape, the great democratizer.

Too bad politicians are not surgically implanted with video cameras upon taking office.

written by dgandhi

| 6 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

*dead

written by therealblankman

| 6 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

This published video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by therealblankman.

written by siftbot

| 6 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

This is the only clip I could still find for this one. Now with bonus footage of a Hillary supporter talking about those poor, tragic heroes in the Florida Democratic party.

written by NetRunner

| 6 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I saw an interview with the head of the Democrats in Florida's House, and she painted it as some Republicans and Democrats pressuring others to basically force the hand of their party in order to make their state matter in the primary elections. Anyone who disagreed got the response, 'don't you want our primaries to matter?' and so they convinced a majority that their national organizations wouldn't come down hard on them for cheating. WRONG!

written by bamdrew

| 6 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

It's worse than the clip makes it look. About 1/3 or a bit more of the committee that judged the situation and imposed the penalties then went to work for the Clinton campaign, including the leader of the group and now senior Hillary adviser Harold Ickes. She as much or more so than anyone was both connected with the people who instituted the penalty and in a position to speak out BEFORE the penalty was imposed but she didn't say a word until after the votes had been cast and it became apparent that she needed those votes now. What words she did speak on the subject supported the primacy of the early States.

At the same time as she now complains about "disenfranchising" these States she also tells us that Pledged delegates which are a direct result of those votes don't have to follow the will of those voters so can switch to her and BTW the supers can override us as well. She doesn't give a damned about voters being disenfranchised, the arguments and logic shift from protecting them to overriding and ignoring them with the only consistent thread in the logic being that it's to her advantage. That's all she cares about in the end.

written by drattus

| 4 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Submit Comment

who voted for this video

NetRunner

- marinara

- dystopianfuturetoday

- uhohzombies

- CaptWillard

- Constitutional_Patriot

- Crosswords