creationism,insane,evolution,science,cymatics Dr.Kent Hovind VS Molecular Geneticist (an actual Dr.)

Dr.Kent Hovind VS Molecular Geneticist (an actual Dr.)

posted by BicycleRepairMan

2 years 1 month 1 week ago • 5351 views

tags: creationism, insane, evolution, science, cymatics

A caller tries to get Hovind to come up with one useful application of creation "science". Hovind cant hear the question, since its only repeated 48 times or so.

GREAT DESIGNS FROM VIDEOSIFT'S T-SHIRT STORE
Support VideoSift - Buy a Shirt! Use coupon code SIFTFALL09 at checkout to save an additional 20% now!
VideoSift Online Video Quality Control	I Was Abducted By Aliens	Aw Man I Shot Marvin In The Face

Comments

I think there's a phrase for this: pwned!

written by shatterdrose

| 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

A man who fears peer review is a man to trust, you bet....

And it's great the way Hovind keeps dragging Islam into the scientific debate, as if the scientific faults of fundamental Islamists somehow justifies his creationist theory that God must exist because the appendix is in the same place every time a doctor cuts somebody open.

It's embarrassing, that such a slug would get air time let alone funding.

written by rougy

| 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

That was awesome. It took a bit to really take off, but talk about satisfying.

written by Hanover_Phist | 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Very well put. I'm actually semi-impressed that Kent didn't bring the discussion of "belief" or "faith" into the argument which usually happens in such a one-sided argument against a Christian's views.

Hahaha...just read that Kent Hovind did (or is still doing) a 10 year term for tax offenses AND he has a theme park called "Dinosaur Land". What a kooky man!!!

written by rottenseed

| 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

haha bitch got served.

written by GoogTube | 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Mr Hovind really should have a reasnoable answer to any of the questions the scientist asked him but he didn't. What Hovind studies is simply study with no view or goal of practicality. Knowledge for knowledge's sake is all well and good, but claiming yourself a scientist as such is ridiculous.

written by omnistegan | 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Fantastic!

written by AnimalsForCrackers

| 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Uhhhm, what am I looking at in the video?

written by cybrbeast

| 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Wow. The caller get's standing ovation in my book. He used logic. That's something that creationists seem to lack understanding of.

written by phelixian

| 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

The video is a demonstration of 'cymatics', a fascinating branch of science that studies standing waves.

written by Irishman

| 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Thanks Irishman, cymatics added to tags, you learn something every day,eh? cheers

written by BicycleRepairMan

| 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

From what I've seen creationists understand logic, they employ the circular spiraling ground loop sort. The kind that gets you no where but appeals to others looking for a comfortable mental trap from which you know all things and your world is easily understood. Just stamp God on the unknown, there ya go! All problems solved.

written by Majortomyorke

| 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

So Dr Hovind's argument goes; "la la la la i'm not listening ... what about islam ... irish people blow eachother up, therefore your argument breaks down sir!" This really is painfull to listen to, but hats off to 'gene boy'

written by tmcdermid | 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

He doesn't even give Hovind a chance to respond. Dumb interview IMO. Cool visuals though.

written by furrycloud | 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

He does. And he repeats his questions many times. He interrupts Hovind only, when he is trying to get around the answer....and Hovind is trying that in most of the cases. I always have similar problems when arguing with someone who hasn't a clue what he's talking about, but is convinced he's right anyway. If I get caught not knowing the question to an answer, I say "dunno" - but creationist can't do that: because with every question they can't answer their whole world view(and meaning of life)is put to the test. So - I wouldn't be upset if anyone would prove a design in nature; just very surprised!
....but the only arguments I can see for now are solemnly based on arrogance ("I don't understand all this - and I'm such a smart guy")and I see no observations which can be only or better explained by the designer-hypothesis.

written by 8362 | 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Agreed, Rougy. Again, it is a question of background in practical and theoretical knowledge, which Hovind clearly lacks. As evidence by the fact that Hovind had no idea what the Geneticist(PS. there is a spelling error there in the title) was talking about when he mention transcription, bioinformatics, and other topics which are common knowledge in biology.

He makes a very nice point at the end, if you could find evidence for applications of creation science then you could get funding to do research in the current scientific system. The reverse is not true.

"In 1971 he graduated from East Peoria High School in East Peoria, Illinois. From 1972 until 1974, Hovind attended the non-accredited Midwestern Baptist College and received a Bachelor of Religious Education (B.R.E.).[6] In 1988 and 1991 respectively, Hovind was awarded a master's degree and doctorate in Christian Education through correspondence from the unaccredited Patriot University in Colorado Springs, Colorado (now Patriot Bible University in Del Norte, Colorado which no longer offers this program)."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind

written by MycroftHomlz

| 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Not only is Hovind completely ignorant in all areas of biology, he doesnt even get the concept of self-funding, which he confuses with getting gullible, religious ignorants to cough up money while babbling in foreign tongues, or as he so charmingly links scientists with his own like-minded morons in Iraq who he thinks pays for their own bombs.

And i fixed the typo, thanks for the heads-up

written by BicycleRepairMan

| 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

for those curious about the actual video itself .... a similar video with accompanying audio that is more descriptive: http://www.videosift.com/video/resonance

and here, done with corn starch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCHPo3EA7oE

written by boblobblaw | 2 years 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)