Devastating 'Message to Sarah Palin' Ad
tags:
Stumble ThisNot that she doesn't have it coming, but damn, this has got to hurt.
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
|
| |||||||||||||||
sarah,palin Devastating 'Message to Sarah Palin' Ad
Comments  who voted for this video JAPR
- dystopianfuturetoday
- jacobrecker
- Oatmeal
- gwiz665
- Issykitty
- EDD
- djsunkid
- Zonbie
- Grimm
- siftbot
x130 - ponceleon
- blahpook
Devastating 'Message To Sarah Palin' Ad Related Videos
| Watch this Video NextFriends O' the Sift Top New Videos by Vote  Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week 14. d3bas3r
(125 votes) Newest Appreciated Comments        | ||||||||||||||
It's so unfair, after all we only have millions of dollars being spent by the McCain campaign and RNC directly stating that Obama wants to raise taxes on everyone over $42,000, and implying that Obama is a socialist for wanting to do a middle class tax cut.
But hey, since a 3rd party Dem group with scarce resources told a half lie, it's totally the same as McCain's ads that tell 4 lies at once blared 24/7 by the main campaign.
Some facts about it:
1. She wanted to ban some stuff, so she asked the person in charge of the libraries what she thought and received the answer that books would not be banned as long as the librarian kept her position
2. She fired the librarian in an attempt to get by her.
3. The librarian was reinstated when people came to her aid.
4. Palin drops the attempt only after it appears she can't win.
Just because she was an INEFFECTIVE nutjob in that case doesn't mean that we shouldn't still know where shes coming from.
Now, all that said, I find it hilarious that the one thing you latch on to here is the book stuff and ignore all the stuff about woman's rights...
Oh, and as for the $42k tax thing... I love it. The reps have been just lying this last week to try to scare people. It went from $250k businesses, to $100k and now the poster above claiming it is for incomes above $42... yeah, keep lying guys... that's the way to better this country, lie a candidate into office.
There's a special place in Idiotsville for women who support other women only because they are women.
Support doesn't mean blindly defend, it means support.
What message does this send to young women? Be pretty, wink alot, and wear expensive clothing, and you can do ANYTHING!
or
maybe he's just a crotchety old man without enough sense to pick a qualified candidate to run with
Unless of course you think it's liberal for women to have rights?
Is it liberal for women to be protected from rape? or is the conservative stance that they shouldn't vote at all?
I don't see how using children is inappropriate. Elections decide the future world children grow up in. It's relevant to the decision people with families are making.
It's not automatically liberal to criticize Palin. If anything Sarah Palin is so far right that criticism is in the centre and relevant to everyone.
needed to be said.
Things like VD, unplanned pregnancy, and rape don't wait around for everyone to turn 18 first. They have a right to ask us to look out for them when it comes to these things.
I latched on to the bit about book banning in this ad, because otherwise it is an EXCELLENT ad that hits all the high points. The point of my comment was to draw attention to the fact that accusing Palin of trying to ban books was an unnecessary lie in a very powerful ad, and that lie could have been enough to turn off a moderate who might otherwise have been swayed, because it injects that little hint of suspicion that there might be other lies in the ad.
The incredible number of negative, falsehood filled advertisements are a big reason the Republicans lost the election, and I really think it's a shame that a small, independent Democrat group decided to throw in a completely debunked claim when they had such an otherwise factual and POWERFUL advertisement.
When the truth is so effective, why throw in even a half-truth?