part2 below, for your convenience

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5PNZFCzCMw

I am gonna create a linked playlist for the two videos which were posted by two separate and distinct users. Since no one has responded to my sift talk post on this subject, I have no guidance on if this is ok, or not. I have not posted either of the two source videos, and made the playlist private instead of public

... sounds good. link it up and I'll change my comment.

updated wikipedia info; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon_Skin_body_armor

"According to Allan D. Bain, CEO and founder of Evolution Armor Inc., the Dragon Skin vests failed because they did not observe "the Article One testing environmental conditioning protocol, which calls for the armor to withstand 165 degrees F for 6 hours," thus the adhesive failed. Pinnacle Armor Inc. has since adopted a new adhesive which is capable of withstanding greater temperatures for extended periods of time. [16]

In response to claims made by several US Senators, Dragon Skin and special interest groups, on Monday, May 21, 2007, the Army held a press conference where they released the test results that the Army says shows that Dragon Skin failed the Army's testing standards and that the current Interceptor body armor is the best available."

*waronterror

Adding video to channels (Waronterror) - requested by raven.

The high-pitched whine that comes along with the first half of this video is incredibly irritating.

high pitched whine? i didnt notice it at all.
Dragon skin is made about 15 miles away from my home so i hear about this stuff all the time. It would be nice if the army would come clean and just say they lied about the armor. Protect our friends and children in Iraq with the best they can find.

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by geo321.