Daft Punk - Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger (Great Video!)

published by snaremop

1 year 10 months 4 weeks ago • 2586 views

tags: daft, punk, harder, better, faster

You should also watch
“Daft Punk - Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger (A CAPPELLA!?)”

Comments

the whole movie (intastella 5555) is great...

written by plastiquemonkey

| 1 year 11 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

yes, this made we want to see it.

written by snaremop

| 1 year 11 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

gotta love me some daft punk!

written by southblvd

| 1 year 10 months 4 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Now, replace the major record label company tycoon with: major blow-up doll company tycoon. The whole thing changes its perspective...

The girl for pleasure, the guy if you're curious, black guy for flavor, and the kid for your secret pedophile libido.

written by legacy0100

| 1 year 10 months 4 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

legacy, wtf are you talking about? Do you get really high and then come one Videosift?

written by snaremop

| 1 year 10 months 4 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

High on quality Videosifts my friend!!

written by legacy0100

| 1 year 10 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

That the real shit, bruh.

written by snaremop

| 1 year 10 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

*dead

written by michie

| 1 year 7 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

The link to this video has been flagged as dead. Fix it within 7 days or it will be discarded (dead called by gold star member michie)

written by siftbot

| 1 year 7 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

*undead

written by snaremop

| 1 year 6 months 4 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

The link to this video has been fixed (undead called by original submitter snaremop)

written by siftbot

| 1 year 6 months 4 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I've seen this. Today. And I found it strange I didn't upvote. But can't find a dupe, so...

written by looris

| 1 year 3 months 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

This video is *dead again.

written by keefer

| 1 year 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Invocations (dead) cannot be called by keefer because keefer is not privileged - sorry.

written by siftbot

| 1 year 1 month ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

oh no! it's *dead

quick fix - dammit this is stupid. Snaremop hasn't been around for about 2 months, so we have to wait 2 days for this to hit the dead pool before it gets fixed. Dumb.

*blog

written by jonny

| 1 year 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

This published video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by jonny.

written by siftbot

| 1 year 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

let's try that again. *blog

written by jonny

| 1 year 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

This video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - blog requested by jonny.

written by siftbot

| 1 year 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Yes it is dumb. but what else can we do besides wait for it to hit the dead pool. I have a fix for it if you don't jonny. why are you blogging this exactly?

written by gorgonheap

| 1 year 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

That's the point gorgonheap - I had the fix immediately and could not apply it (note the link in my original comment, which I also left on snaremop's profile page). The reason I blogged it was to point out how silly the 2 day delay is, and hopefully get it changed so that videos which can be fixed quickly are. The reason for allowing the original poster to have some time to fix his/her own deads is no longer relevant since fixing a video no longer transfers ownership.

My apologies if this was an inappropriate way to bring attention to this. It's been mentioned more than once before though, and nothing happened. At the very least, I was hoping to get an explanation for the policy. Again, sorry for doing it this way or if I'm overstepping here.

written by jonny

| 1 year 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

No apologies necessary. It has been brought up in the past, I was just trying to be clear on your point. My understanding is that the two day rule is for the original submitter to fix it first. Mostly because they would know the contents of the video better than anyone else. Sorry you have to wait. You could post a new ST thread and bring it up again.

written by gorgonheap

| 1 year 3 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)