Carl Sagan on Charlie Rose • VideoSift: Online Video *Quality Control

Featured Member Comment

Bill O'Reilly on his own meltdown - “He admits it was just drama to entertain his co-workers, so everyone can drop this issue now.” read more by BillOreilly

Carl Sagan On Charlie Rose Related Videos

Quentin Tarantino interviewed on Charlie Rose (10/10/2003)

Charlie Rose - "Stanley Kubrick: A Life in Pictures"

Conan on Charlie Rose - (56:40) great discussion

Carl Sagan on Charlie Rose

published by mdh 1 year 2 weeks ago • 387 views

tags: sagan science reason atheism rose

bookmarks (0)

Carl Sagan and Charlie Rose discuss "Deamon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark." Non-believers shall enjoy...

Comments

BHA is the best. I saw him live in Alaska about 10 years ago. Wish he could have lived to be 100.

written by deathcow

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

It's sad when Charlie Rose is smarter than Carl Sagan.

written by CaptainPlanet420

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ -1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

What the hell are you talking about CaptainPlanet? Please take your fake ultra-right wing cosplay elsewhere, it's just not funny and doesn't fool anyone.

written by BoneyD

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Its always nice to see Carl, I think for many of us who read his books, its not too much of a stretch to say that he changed our lives. There's no going back to the cowering fear and confusing darkness of an unenlightened, superstition imbued life after learning how to think skeptically from him. He was simultaneously incandescently brilliant and deeply poetic, an extreme rarity. The planet is impoverished greatly for his loss. That said, its a shame this interview is essentially totally wasted on Charlie Rose. Nearly all his questions are frustratingly (even embarrasingly) childish and trite. It's painfully obvious he doesn't get it even by the end of the interview, "faith, Carl, faith". Whatever Charlie.

written by gluonium

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Charlie Rose is kidding himself, Carl Sagan was one of the wisest men ever.

written by johnald128

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I miss you Carl, billions upon billions times

written by rickabruzzo | 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Right there with ya rickabruzzo! Right there with ya....

written by EMPIRE | 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

"What the hell are you talking about CaptainPlanet? Please take your fake ultra-right wing cosplay elsewhere, it's just not funny and doesn't fool anyone."

Calm down son, anger isn't wisdom. Sagan has no life, no emotion. He's like a robot. At least Rose is funny.

written by CaptainPlanet420

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ -1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Anger is, however, a useful response to a statement that was obviously intended to invoke such a reaction. You say that Carl Sagan was less intelligent on topics of global conservation, evolution, astronomy than his interviewer? Please explain yourself. Oh, now you change your slant to say he has no emotion, since you cannot obviously support the prior comment. Sagan did nothing but build, in his viewers, a emotional response to wonders and dangers of science and foster a love for the natural world.

Now... I ask why you would want to speak so derisively against such a man? How many guesses do I get?

written by BoneyD

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Don't feed the trolls, BoneyD. Didn't you see the sign?

written by Fletch

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

"Now... I ask why you would want to speak so derisively against such a man? How many guesses do I get?"

You didn't use anger. Why not, you should have. And I don't see how Sagan *yawn* inspires emotion, when as another said in the other video, he sounds like Agent Smith. LOL

written by CaptainPlanet420

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Hey now! Don't misconstrue my words...:)

Even Stephen Hawking speaking through a monotonic machine inspires many a chelloveck including myself...I don't see how someone's voice has any bearing on what they're actually saying with it.

written by AnimalsForCrackers

| 1 year 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)