cheap,steady,eagle scout Camera Stabilization for $1

Camera Stabilization for $1

posted by sbchapm

1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago • 4092 views

tags: cheap, steady, eagle scout

GREAT DESIGNS FROM VIDEOSIFT'S T-SHIRT STORE
Support VideoSift - Buy a Shirt! Use coupon code SIFTFALL09 at checkout to save an additional 20% now!
Dublyutief	God Is Unbelievable	VideoSift Online Video Quality Control

Comments

Wow, that's actually a really good idea. I think I'll be making one of those. Big upvote.

written by Sarzy

| 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I don't care if the cool chimp already said it, those were going to be my exact words.

Wow, that's actually a really good idea.

written by MarineGunrock

| 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Good times. But, I say, what if you want to move around? or not take picture at eye level? or not look ridiculous? what then, I ask to no-one in particular?!

you guys are familiar with the other poor-man's steadycam, right? with the weights and whatnot? http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~johnny/steadycam/

written by bamdrew

| 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

^ the other steadycam is done by Johnny Lee, of Wii-controller-modification fame.

written by E_Nygma

| 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

>> ^bamdrew:
Good times. But, I say, what if you want to move around? or not take picture at eye level? or not look ridiculous? what then, I ask to no-one in particular?!

you guys are familiar with the other poor-man's steadycam, right? with the weights and whatnot? http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~johnny/steadycam/

But that completely defeats the purpose of this one. It's big and probably weighs a ton. You can't just slip it in your pocket. And as far as looking ridiculous? I think a tiny string looks FAR less ridiculous than that huge contraption.

written by MarineGunrock

| 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

It is a nifty trick, but you know what else works and allows TOTAL movement? Tucking your arms in, and improving your shooting posture. Plus there is nothing better than just practice.

written by Arsenault185

| 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 2 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Damn fine idea.

written by cheesemoo

| 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

(woops! didn't mean to make it sound like i thought one idea was better than the other, just that one solves another set of problems, while making you look even more ridiculous.)

written by bamdrew

| 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

That's actually awesome... I like, I like a lot.

written by spoco2

| 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

An even cheaper method is to just set the camera to shoot in the fasted burst mode, lean against something if possible and shoot a long burst of shots. Chances are you'll get at least one usable one. I've gotten really good shots with a non IS telephoto lens by shooting a long burst of shots.

written by jimnms

| 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

You don't need to steady the camera for action shots. You would use a high shutter speed.

written by deedub81

| 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

People there is no universal right answer, lens, bursts, shutter speeds. These might fix the problem as well but might not give the look you're going for. All depends on what you want, what you want in focus, and so on. I think this is an interesting idea though im skeptical and i want to try it to see how effective it actually is.

written by 9058

| 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Submit Comment

Connect with Facebook

- OR -

playlists with this video

<1 min by daxgaz

• MacGyver by Laekroth

who voted for this video

gorillaman

- sbchapm