CNN Video:Lou Dobbs Slams CFR & North American Union

published by Constitutional_Patriot

1 year 3 months 1 week ago • 648 views

tags: nwo, nafta, nau

playlists (0)

You should also watch
“North American Union: The Truth”

Once again Lou Dobbs Brings the Horrors of The North American Union to Mainstream.

Council on Foreign Relations member calls Lou Dobbs a conspiracy theorist. Lou calls them unqualified and elitist.

Comments

Yes, that's it. If a member of the CFR who has studied the issue for 30 years (i.e. made a career out of it) disagrees with an amateurish journalist, it's the former who's unqualified.

Right. And the moon is made of swiss cheese.

written by Tofumar

| 1 year 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ -1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

If you had actually watched the video, you would have seen that "unqualified" in the summary referred to Dobbs' statement that the NAU was unelected and unsupported by the people.

written by jwray

| 1 year 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Hey??? badtofu?....my moon is made of swiss parts and movements....and dude, this is no, "mind blowing documentary"...it's a news segment....get a room!!!

like in a library, the collectives should codify, organize....not a private masturbation area for all comers....anyhow, yeah....close the borders or don't

written by choggie

| 1 year 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

oh...and CNN??? A FUCKING TOOL!, Dumbasses....the conspiracy is real, and in your mind, that it is not, and the world changes for the good, the bad, and the ugly....check a mirror,

..and for crissakes, read a goddamn book!

written by choggie

| 1 year 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

lol. Had there not been a CNN logo I would have thought I was watchin Fox News.

written by ajkido

| 1 year 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

jwray: I did watch the video, That's how I know the guy has worked on the issue for 30 years. Dobbs implied the THE GUY was unqualified to speak authoritatively on the topic because he was unelected (and because his research was unsupported by the opinions of most Americans). That's absurd enough that it shouldn't need any rebuttal. He's a citizen and an expert on the issue--much more so than Dobbs--and that's all the qualification he needs.

Also, it wouldn't even make much sense to say that the "NAU was unelected," sinced the NAU is an idea, and we don't elect ideas. We elect people. So, if that's what Dobbs said, then fine. He's a retard either way. This issue tends to draw them out. Finally, I'd point out that you seem to be on the same side of this as Choggie. Doesn't that...um...scare the fuck out of you?

Choggie: I didn't give it the mind-blowing documentary tag. So calm down. Also.....Huh?

ajkido: I know. Sad.

written by Tofumar

| 1 year 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Two things that would improve America exponentially:

1) A useful publicly-owned news channel, like BBC or CBC
2) More political parties besides the Democrats/Republicans

written by cardboardhut | 1 year 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

cardboardhut: I agree wholeheartedly on #2. As for #1, we have PBS/NPR. They are good, and I get alot of my news from them. But they don't get to be the only game in town like the BBC (I'm assuming). In other words, they have to compete with other, privately owned stations. This is as it should be. It leads to a greater diversity of voices, and allows each station to develop excellent niche programs (e.g. This American Life, 60 Minutes, etc).

written by Tofumar

| 1 year 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

We have C-Span and C-Span2.

written by jwray

| 1 year 3 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Submit Comment

who voted for this video

Constitutional_Patriot

- codenazi - Tofumar

- dotdude