Bush booed at Nationals opener

And no, they're not really shouting BOOO-ush, either.
Drachen_Jagersays...

There were people cheering TerraKhan? That's funny, I must not have heard it over the boos.

Seriously, selective hearing? Did you hear the boos and not the cheers in the Michael Moore Oscar speech?

Stalin, Nero and Nixon all had better approval ratings.

budzossays...

There are people cheering too. It was a good pitch for a president in his sixties. Very casual and decent form. He might have won some people over by putting up a self-deprecating "ball" umpire signal after the pitch.

jwraysays...

>> ^furrycloud:
I wish I was old enough to remember a time when the President of the United States was a respected position...


Clinton wasn't so bad. But if you're older than 8, that means you're not into Bush or Clinton. If you don't like Bush you probably don't like his dad or Reagan. Then maybe Jimmy Carter was the last respectable president? If he's not good enough for you, then you probably don't like Ford, Nixon, or LBJ. Kennedy was a big war hawk like Bush, with the bay of pigs fiasco and other attempts to set up puppet governments in foreign countries. And kennedy escalated the vietnam war. Eisenhower raped Iran and replaced its growing democracy with the Shah because of the red scare. Truman bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. So.... Maybe you think FDR was the last respectable president?

I personally think Clinton was OK. At least his hawkish foreign policy worked and didn't get us into any long-term quagmires. He made some mistakes:
1. Failure to veto COPA
2. Failure to veto DoMA
3. Falure to veto DMCA
4. The welfare-to-work bill.

choggiesays...

furrycloud-you would have to be at least 60-
53-63 it was Ike then Kennedy-After the assassination, elections have been engineered, and your vote has meant fuck-all
The delusional above who thinks Clinton was pretty good???....Yet another case of selective memory disorder, lack of overall knowledge of historical facts, and some idyllic,"My perfect world" bullshit thrown in-Clinton is a tool, one of the most ill-equipped to lead a nation-his wife is smarter and scarier-

Some folks only see something or someone as being good or bad if it fits their ideal world scenario, regardless of how they deal with the paradigm.....
jwray, all for opening the floodgates on freedoms here, and the bills cited do not have a lot to do with anything but matters of money and agenda-the shit Clinton allowed to be done, and that he abjectly neglected are his butt-fuck the U.S., legacy, not a few vetos that effect agenda-motivated minorities.

FDR engineered many a fistfuck for the future that guided the country to the sad state it is in today...33'-38'(New Deal) was a time of setting the place up for to fall ripe from the tree, the fruits of stolen (depression) American dreams-

Big war hawk.....conflict is continually in the process of being engineered, NO president within the current paradigm which involves the building of wealth capitol and commerce within a contrived and retrograde system is innocent.....

" I personally think Clinton was OK. At least his hawkish foreign policy worked and didn't get us into any long-term quagmires."-
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/29/25139.shtml
(The Sleeping Giant Clinton Fuck-Up.)
http://ssqq.com/ARCHIVE/intern03.htm
Dig a little deeper my friend....Bill and his Hillary are not to be fucked with in the arena of lies, deceit-the are some of the vilest of lackeys on the planet-Very usable.

jonnysays...

>> ^thesnipe:
And the damn commentators didn't pick up on it, bastards.


Yeah, well, they had to talk to him in the booth later. That would've been pretty freaking awkward if their first question was, "So, what do you think about all those boos?"

jwraysays...

1. The sale of radiation-hardened microchips to china... OH NOES THE SKY IS FALLING!!
China already had a fuckload of ICBMs. It's irrelevant.

2. "Clinton Body Count" -- this is just a list of coincidences, many of which are fabricated or exaggerated, with no solid evidence.

cheesemoosays...

Just read that microchip article... yes, you probably want your nuke's chips radiation hardened, but I'm fairly sure that EVERYTHING you put into space needs to be radiation hardened. I don't think it's a big deal, chogster.

>> ^jwray:
1. The sale of radiation-hardened microchips to china... OH NOES THE SKY IS FALLING!!
China already had a fuckload of ICBMs. It's irrelevant.
2. "Clinton Body Count" -- this is just a list of coincidences, many of which are fabricated or exaggerated, with no solid evidence.

siftbotsays...

This published video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by mas8705.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More