Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
12 Comments
grintersays...Edited to correct a horribly mangled sentence:
With all of those particles being ejected, it is not hard to believe that lead bullets or depleted uranium shells could lead to health hazards for families living in a war zone (beyond the obvious health hazards, of course).
garmachisays...Beautiful!
*findthumb
siftbotsays...A different thumbnail image for this video could not be found for findthumb request by garmachi.
deathcowsays...damn ouch... watch out if you get shot it looks like the bullets would be very warm and might burn you
GeeSussFreeKsays...>> ^grinter:
With all of those particles being ejected, it is not hard to believe that the huge amounts of lead bullets of depleted uranium shells could lead to health hazards for families living in a war zone (beyond the obvious health hazards, of course).
Heheh little misspeak there, lead bullets are lead, and depleted uranium bullets are made from depleted uranium
"In a three week period of conflict in Iraq during 2003 it was estimated over 1000 tons of depleted uranium munitions were used mostly in cities.[7] While any radiation exposure has risks, no conclusive data have correlated DU exposure to specific human health effects such as cancer.[8] Yet, studies using cultured cells and laboratory rodents continue to suggest the possibility of leukemogenic, genetic, reproductive, and neurological effects from chronic exposure.[9] In addition, the UK Pensions Appeal Tribunal Service in early 2004 attributed birth defect claims from a February 1991 Gulf War combat veteran to depleted uranium poisoning.[10][11] Also, a 2005 epidemiology review concluded: "In aggregate the human epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in offspring of persons exposed to DU."[12]"
7 ^ a b c Paul Brown, Gulf troops face tests for cancer guardian.co.uk 25 April 2003, Retrieved February 3, 2009
8 ^ Health Effects of Uranium. "Toxicological profile for uranium". http://fhp.osd.mil/du/healthEffects.jsp.
9 ^ Miller AC, McClain D. (2007 Jan-Mar). "A review of depleted uranium biological effects: in vitro and in vivo studies". Rev Environ Health 22 (1): 75–89. PMID 17508699.
10 ^ Williams, M. (February 9, 2004) "First Award for Depleted Uranium Poisoning Claim," The Herald Online, (Edinburgh: Herald Newspapers, Ltd.)
11 ^ Campaign Against Depleted Uranium (Spring, 2004) "MoD Forced to Pay Pension for DU Contamination," CADU News 17)
12 ^ a b c d Hindin, R. et al. (2005) "Teratogenicity of depleted uranium aerosols: A review from an epidemiological perspective," Environmental
A quick wiki shows it is controversial at least. One would suppose that it would be at least somewhat harmful. Did you ever hear about that illness soldiers were coming back with from the first Gulf war? It wasn't really talked about much and I remember it being later attributed to the burning oil fields, perhaps this is a more likely culprit.
grintersays...^Thanks for the heads-up on my poor grammar, and for the info. I'm guessing that minor mental retardation in children would be the biggest risk.
geo321says...>>GeeSussFreeK
In rural Vietnam they teach children about bombies (from cluster bombs) within their school curriculum to this day. While uranium shells penetrate a target better I doubt the military planners in the US have taken into consideration the long term effects pf uranium shells.
SlipperyPetesays...*metal?
siftbotsays...Adding video to channels (Metal) - requested by SlipperyPete.
gwiz665says...^Nice try buster.
*nochannel *timeshift *wtf
siftbotsays...This video has been removed from all channels (Timeshift, Metal) due to invalid channel assignment - nochannel invoked by gwiz665. Please review the FAQ to learn about appropriate channel assignments.
Adding video to channels (Timeshift, Wtf) - requested by gwiz665.
GeeSussFreeKsays...^ I would guess not. Though, when designing a weapon, I don't know if the idea of making it "less deadly" ever really makes it to the consideration table...I know I wouldn't think of that.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.