"At long last, have you left no sense of decency?"
tags:
Stumble ThisOn June 9, 1954, the 30th day of the hearings, McCarthy accused Fred Fisher, one of the junior attorneys at Welch's firm, of association (while in law school) with the National Lawyers Guild (NLG), a group which J. Edgar Hoover sought to have the U.S. Attorney General designate as a Communist front organization (see Army-McCarthy hearings). Welch wrote off Fisher's association with the NLG as a youthful indiscretion and went after McCarthy for dragging the young man's name before a nationwide television audience with no prior warning or previous agreement to do so:
“Until this moment, Senator, I think I have never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness. Fred Fisher is a young man who went to the Harvard Law School and came into my firm and is starting what looks to be a brilliant career with us...(L)ittle did I dream you could be so reckless and so cruel as to do an injury to that lad. It is true that he will continue to be with Hale and Dorr (Welch's law firm). It is, I regret to say, equally true that I fear he shall always bear a scar needlessly inflicted by you. If it were in my power to forgive you for your reckless cruelty I would do so. I like to think that I am a gentle man, but your forgiveness will have to come from someone other than me.”
When McCarthy tried to go on the attack once more, Welch stepped in again and famously rebuked:
“Senator, may we not drop this? We know he belonged to the Lawyers Guild...Let us not assassinate this lad further, Senator. You have done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”
McCarthy tried to ask Welch another question about Fisher, and Welch cut him off:
“Mr. McCarthy, I will not discuss this with you further. You have sat within six feet of me and could have asked about Fred Fisher. You have seen fit to bring it out. If there is a God in Heaven it will do neither you nor your cause any good. I will not discuss it further. I will not ask Mr. Cohn any more questions. You, Mr. Chairman, may, if you will, call the next witness."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_N._Welch
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The event was widely regarded to herald the fall of communist witch hunts in the US, and an end to McCarthy-ism.
From the moment of Welch's eloquent and much-quoted utterance, Joseph McCarthy's reputation started to wane, and before long it had collapsed. He lost his popularity with the public (his altercation with Welch was seen live on TV, and the newspapers the next day recorded in print for those who didn't see it). Ultimately he was censured by his Senate colleagues. When he died three years later after a period of alcohol abuse he was a broken man. Never was there a clearer example to show that sometimes, in the face of real evil and dangerous power, one person can stand up and win a battle with a simple speech act.
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001036.html
“Until this moment, Senator, I think I have never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness. Fred Fisher is a young man who went to the Harvard Law School and came into my firm and is starting what looks to be a brilliant career with us...(L)ittle did I dream you could be so reckless and so cruel as to do an injury to that lad. It is true that he will continue to be with Hale and Dorr (Welch's law firm). It is, I regret to say, equally true that I fear he shall always bear a scar needlessly inflicted by you. If it were in my power to forgive you for your reckless cruelty I would do so. I like to think that I am a gentle man, but your forgiveness will have to come from someone other than me.”
When McCarthy tried to go on the attack once more, Welch stepped in again and famously rebuked:
“Senator, may we not drop this? We know he belonged to the Lawyers Guild...Let us not assassinate this lad further, Senator. You have done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”
McCarthy tried to ask Welch another question about Fisher, and Welch cut him off:
“Mr. McCarthy, I will not discuss this with you further. You have sat within six feet of me and could have asked about Fred Fisher. You have seen fit to bring it out. If there is a God in Heaven it will do neither you nor your cause any good. I will not discuss it further. I will not ask Mr. Cohn any more questions. You, Mr. Chairman, may, if you will, call the next witness."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_N._Welch
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The event was widely regarded to herald the fall of communist witch hunts in the US, and an end to McCarthy-ism.
From the moment of Welch's eloquent and much-quoted utterance, Joseph McCarthy's reputation started to wane, and before long it had collapsed. He lost his popularity with the public (his altercation with Welch was seen live on TV, and the newspapers the next day recorded in print for those who didn't see it). Ultimately he was censured by his Senate colleagues. When he died three years later after a period of alcohol abuse he was a broken man. Never was there a clearer example to show that sometimes, in the face of real evil and dangerous power, one person can stand up and win a battle with a simple speech act.
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001036.html
And now we have a sitting commie president and a state-run media propping him up. If irony was cheese, we'd all be eating nachos.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/Little_Rock_integration_protest.jpg
>> ^quantumushroom:
And now we have a sitting commie president and a state-run media propping him up. If irony was cheese, we'd all be eating nachos.
If irony was cheese, we'd all be eating nachos.
I think you guys misunderstand qm's comment here - it may have some validity.
By equating it with nacho cheese, he's suggesting that this irony is a bland, low-class imitation of the real thing, cut from wholly artificial ingredients, and ultimately leaving a bad taste in the mouth of anyone unfortunate enough to experience it.
And now we have a sitting commie president and a state-run media propping him up. If irony was cheese, we'd all be eating nachos.
upvote for satisfying your modus operandii
>> ^quantumushroom:
And now we have a sitting commie president and a state-run media propping him up. If irony was cheese, we'd all be eating nachos.
upvote for satisfying your modus operandii
I could smell his comment a mile a way.
Is there a reason why HUAC is a tag for this clip? For those who don't know the difference, I implore you to learn the facts prior to passing judgment on a good man.
Because people are too stupid to know the difference between the House and the Senate?
I know, I know, it was a rhetorical question, but I'm afraid your point might have been too subtle for the Olbermann/Maddow fluffbrains here on Videosift.