|
| |||||||||||||||
illegals,vote buying,taxocrats,repubicans,traitors all 2009 Amnesty Bill: Another Steaming Piece of Sh*t2009 Amnesty Bill: Another Steaming Piece of Sh*ttags:Why traitorcrats buy votes from illegals with sh*t legislation like this is understandable, even logical, but what do traitorpublicans like McShamnesty get out of it? Not being called racist (too late)? 2010 can't get here fast enough.
Comments  who voted for this video quantumushroom
- MikesHL13
- GeeSussFreeK
- volumptuous
- Sagemind
2009 Amnesty Bill: Another Steaming Piece Of Sh*t Related Videos
| Watch this Video NextFriends O' the Sift Top New Videos by Vote                Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week 8. lore_weaver
(234 votes) 13. erikwdavis
(181 votes) Newest Appreciated Comments       | ||||||||||||||
Stumble This
Keep telling yourself that QM. If all you've got is your dreams, I don't want to be the one to spoil it for you.
And how can you seriously post a CNN clip? Aren't they the Communist News Network? Isn't everything they say a lie? Shouldn't we just ignore this as anti-American propaganda?
Keep telling yourself that QM. If all you've got is your dreams, I don't want to be the one to spoil it for you.
You won't spoil anything. The idiots have already punished themselves and the rest of America by electing a clueless community activist. It may take 20% unemployment to wake up the rest, but change is coming, my friends.
QM, how come you can't express an opinion without sophomoric name-calling?
Ask the same question over at Daily Kos and Huff Post. More perfect terms speed along the message in today's ADD environment. For example, by using "Taxocrat" instead of "Democrat" I don't have to explain every time that the Democratic solution for all problems is to raise taxes.
You're, if I'm not mistaken, among the oldest members of this site (referring to your age, not your time as a member) and yet you're also among the worst, most childish debaters.
It's not the flavor you're upset with, it's that I'm serving you something that's not on the menu. Unlike your unionized teachers, kollij proffs, goofball gangstaz, hollywood and enter-stainers like Colbertowitz, I have nothing to gain by lying to you about life and consequences, and as I like to point out from time to time, if you can present facts that prove liberal policies do anything but make life harder for a much wider swath of the population than they claim to help, I'm all ears.
And how can you seriously post a CNN clip? Aren't they the Communist News Network? Isn't everything they say a lie? Shouldn't we just ignore this as anti-American propaganda?
Dobbs--not a favorite of liberals, a proponent of lawful borders and therefore a "racist"--isn't making stuff up here like some Olbermann, he's reading off an actual proposed bill. That's what's truly frightening.
This would be funny if he wasn't the highest ranking member of the minority party. Instead, it's just scary and sad.
QM - What's "truly frightening" is you're letting Boehner, the man who doesn't even know the fucking difference between the US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, do your thinking for you.
This would be funny if he wasn't the highest ranking member of the minority party. Instead, it's just scary and sad.
Ask the same question over at Daily Kos and Huff Post. More perfect terms speed along the message in today's ADD environment. For example, by using "Taxocrat" instead of "Democrat" I don't have to explain every time that the Democratic solution for all problems is to raise taxes.
If I gave a shit about Kos or Huff Post I would. I don't, though. I asked you because your voice, your opposition, is needed here and you undercut all your own arguments by talking like a 4th grader. Acting like a child because some of your opposition acts like children doesn't change the fact that you're acting like a child.
It's not the flavor you're upset with, it's that I'm serving you something that's not on the menu. Unlike your unionized teachers, kollij proffs, goofball gangstaz, hollywood and enter-stainers like Colbertowitz, I have nothing to gain by lying to you about life and consequences, and as I like to point out from time to time, if you can present facts that prove liberal policies do anything but make life harder for a much wider swath of the population than they claim to help, I'm all ears.
I don't believe I've ever accused you of lying; I'm certainly not now. It's not the flavor or the dish that I'm upset with or I'd have said so. My "approval rating" around here may fluctuate but I don't think anyone could seriously accuse me of not saying what I mean. Unions, schools/colleges/universities, gangsters and Hollywood have nothing to do with my questions. You're making my point for me with your misdirection attempt. The Democrats could literally turn into the Communist party you like to claim they are right now and it wouldn't validate your inability to formulate a mature argument.
Dobbs--not a favorite of liberals, a proponent of lawful borders and therefore a "racist"--isn't making stuff up here like some Olbermann, he's reading off an actual proposed bill. That's what's truly frightening.
I mean to actually take a look at the bill when I have the time. As is typical with any "news reporter", Dobbs doesn't actually quote anything from the bill, he just tells us what he (or the Heritage Foundation) wants us to believe it says. He may be telling the truth, but I'd be surprised. If the bill really said any of these things, why not just read/show us the text?
I don't want the opinions of any reporter; I'll form my own when I see the bill. This is why I don't watch the news.