Quick Options

NSFW Content:
Listing Mode:
Coloring Style:
Animations:

◀ Quick Options    Login    Register
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
Recent Comments by shatterdrose subscribe to this feed

P.W. Singer: Military robots and the future of war TED Talks
^ @ MG, I'm guessing you didn't really pay attention. He's not talking solely about things that are currently on the battlefield. He mentions Moore's Law, which I'm guessing you didn't hear. But Moore's Law simply states that technology will double every so many years. 60 years ago we didn't even have computers. 20 years ago the first cellular phone came out. Today, I'm sitting on a laptop that has more processing power than the entire world had 50 years ago with more storage capacity than was actually known just 200 years ago at the beginning of the scientific revolution. I carry a phone that tells me where I am to within feet, connects to the internet, downloads videos, stores a database of everything I want to know, and allows me to interface with it by touch and voice. 10 years ago I got my first cell phone . . . and can you guess what it did? Yeah, it called people. And I had to remember the numbers myself.

Singer isn't talking strictly about what is out there now. That's why he quotes the number of drones present at the beginning of this "war" and how many are currently there. Those Packbots are made by the same company that makes Roomba's. So basically, if you own a Roomba, you're a few sensors and a remote away from a Packbot. (That would be the makers comment, not my own.)

Your comment about still needing an operator . . . That is his entire thesis pretty much. When you have an operator who relies on the machine what is the possible consequence? Shooting down a civilian aircraft? Blowing up 3 civilians because their height profiles match Bin Laden? Yes, both have happened. Both times innocent people died while an "operator" controlled the machine.

Additionally, what happens when the operator has no sense of danger? They can just spray bullets into a crowd hoping to hit the bad guy? Maybe they become too easy to kill? Or maybe a group of hormone laden boys will sit around a tv screen and watch and cheer and people get blown up and get pissed off and want more carnage when their own gets injured? When you operate that Camary you pay with your life if you send it off the road or crash it into another car. If it's remote controlled, all you lose if your car and possibly kill a few others. You know, that HUGE debate over video games . . .

You may think he's a douche, but you completely missed his point because you sat there wanting to slap him instead. Kinda ironic I think, considering if you were there in person you would have listened more, but now that you're disconnected via a screen you're welcomed to wander aimlessly and make careless mistakes.


written by shatterdrose  | 1 week 4 days ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
comment listing type:
Friends O' the Sift
Top 15 Sifters of All Time
1. Zifnab  (55056 votes)
2. arvana  (45574 votes)
3. dystopianfuturetoday  (43981 votes)
4. kronosposeidon  (40933 votes)
5. NetRunner  (39964 votes)
6. blankfist  (37399 votes)
7. ant  (35426 votes)
8. mintbbb  (31855 votes)
9. Farhad2000  (31825 votes)
10. eric3579  (30585 votes)
11. rasch187  (30519 votes)
12. Issykitty  (27304 votes)
13. mlx  (21762 votes)
14. deputydog  (21106 votes)
15. Fedquip  (20926 votes)
Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week
1. EndAll  (367 votes)
2. brycewi19  (329 votes)
3. kronosposeidon  (318 votes)
4. MikesHL13  (311 votes)
5. rasch187  (309 votes)
6. arvana  (242 votes)
7. dystopianfuturetoday  (238 votes)
8. demon_ix  (232 votes)
9. reiwan  (222 votes)
10. Sagemind  (197 votes)
11. marinara  (196 votes)
12. lovelynotes  (196 votes)
13. dan00108  (171 votes)
14. BoneyD  (161 votes)
15. ant  (157 votes)