Featured Member Comment
Bill O'Reilly on his own meltdown - “He admits it was just drama to entertain his co-workers, so everyone can drop this issue now.” read more by BillOreilly
Bill O'Reilly on his own meltdown - “He admits it was just drama to entertain his co-workers, so everyone can drop this issue now.” read more by BillOreilly
comment listing type:
Top New Videos by Vote
Roger Wheeler
Dave Anderson
Mark Orr
Paul Hyman
Timo Kujansuu
Top Rated New Comments
Videos Being Viewed Right Now
Subscribe
Partner Links
Top 15 Users by Vote Rank
Video Tag Cloud
50s
60s
70s
80s
90s
ad
amazing
animation
art
awesome
baby
bbc
beautiful
beer
british
bush
car
cartoon
cat
classic
clinton
comedy
commercial
cool
crash
crazy
cute
dance
dancing
death
documentary
dog
drugs
election
family guy
fight
film
fire
football
french
fun
funny
game
guitar
hilarious
history
horror
interview
iraq
japan
japanese
jazz
kids
live
love
mashup
movie
movies
music
music video
nature
news
nintendo
obama
of
ouch
parody
piano
police
politics
pop
prank
president
punk
race
rap
religion
robot
rock
ron paul
science
sex
short
show
simpsons
snl
song
space
spoof
standup
star wars
the
trailer
tv
video
war
water
weird
wow
wtf
Newest Sift Talk Posts
1. The new FEAR css is live! Let me know what you think. (Fear Talk)
3. Barack Obama defies all odds (Election08 Talk)
4. Why the Sift shouldn't bow to Region Blocking (Canada Talk)
5. How do you measure a man? Kronosposeidon (Books Talk)
Recently Updated Playlists
VideoSift Links
How do you measure a man? Kronosposeidon (Books Talk Post)
And KP you are one big dude, so the ladies tell me.
Notify User Before *discuss If Bronze or Higher (Sift Talk Post)
That's why it is called discuss.
I would agree to unspoken etiquette.
mas8705
In reply to this comment by mas8705:
Time out!
I just watch both this one and fedquip's spider pigs and they are the exact same! When does a different aspect ratio count as being different?
I would discard, but seeing how there was an eariler discussion on this already, I'm going to submit this for a 2nd *discuss
Spider-Pig... Spider-Pig
Not to call you out here. But I think we should write down in the accepted protocol that people should notify the user, or at least try to, before sending something to *discuss. Especially, if that user is not a noob. I can understand the no mandatory waiting period on pulling the 'trigger' so to speak on new users, but common courtesy would suggest we should have a different policy for consistent contributors.
Jon Stewart on Crossfire
Whatever you do, don't make fun of Hitler
Hulk Hogan vs Andre the Giant - Wrestlemania III 1987
Evolution of the Eye Made Easy
"He [the reader] who will go thus far, if he find on finishing this treatise that large bodies of facts, otherwise inexplicable, can be explained by the theory of descent, ought not to hesitate to go further, and to admit that a structure even as perfect as the eye of an eagle might be formed by natural selection, although in this case he does not know any of the transitional grades [as supported by the fossil record]."
Runon hellloooooo... Dave, you need a new editor. This is merely another example of one of a slew of poorly crafted and convoluted sentences that permeate your text. After writing several published papers and now a book chapter myself, I realise the trick is to keep it simple. A text isn't done when there is nothing left to add; it is finished when there is nothing left to take out. Sentences should be simple, and each should convey one or two points. More importantly in scientific papers, journals, and books, it is quintessential that you establish logos by referencing existing peer reviewed literature.
You might be upset, but hopefully you see my points. I am trying to explain to you that in science there are rules. If you want to set creationism up as an alternative theory, or understand science through a biblical lens, then you are absolutely doing a disservice to your cause by not using rhetorical appeals. It is also a disservice to write poorly, which you do. Really, how can you expect people to learn your thoughts with such magnificently horrible writing?
Evolution of the Eye Made Easy
Evolution of the Eye Made Easy
Before I read your comment I will give you some basic advise: keep it short. Make your points clear and outline them simply.
1. Delineate your thoughts and your points with 'returns'.
2. If you cite a source, leave a link.
3. Don't copy and paste without quotes.
This is an internet forum, and people like me have short attention spans. Make it easy for people to engage your comments and raise counter points. I am downvoting your comment for these reasons.
>> ^CDavidParsons:
The following dissertation on the eye...
Nice, nice
Evolution of the Eye Made Easy
The point of science is it tries to grapple with new evidence and understand how to make sense of it in terms of existing theories. Then, if you can't make sense of it you come up with a new theory, which still agrees with all the old evidence and the new piece, just discovered.
Kulpims Goes Gold 100! (Worldaffairs Talk Post)
Goose VS. Man on a boat with his dog
Hulk Hogan vs Andre the Giant - Wrestlemania III 1987
Holy Dag on a stick! You have got to be kidding me. How can you not vote for this? Is this a joke? Are you trying to mess with my reality by conspiring to not vote for possibly one of the single greatest scenes in television history. Cause it is working and I would like you to stop.
The man weighed over 400lbs and Hulk Hogan lifted him up in the air and body slammed him.