Quick Options

NSFW Content:
Listing Mode:
Coloring Style:
Animations:

◀ Quick Options    Login    Register
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
Is there any chance we can get a requeue button/linky thing next to the video, so that we dont have to spam the comments with invocations and siftbot replies.. There are so many videos now with like 4 or 6 "comments" that are simply requeue requests and confirmations.. it looks spammy and annoying at this point.. videos that are slow out of the queue all get spammed down with this. its ok with invocations to add channels, tags and promotes, but requeue is only for the submitter anyways, right?

By the way, isnt resift or resubmit a better word?, certainly easier to spell.. and more logical now that the queue is called Unsifted..
bookmarks (0)
Comments subscribe to this feed
That is a really, really good suggestion. Honestly, unless it's technically hard to implement, I don't see why anyone would have a problem with this. I'd *quality this post, but I don't believe I have the points.


written by Sarzy  | 1 year 9 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
Sarzy cannot award a quality point for this Sift Talk post because Sarzy does not have enough Power Points - ignoring quality request by Sarzy.


written by siftbot  | 1 year 9 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
*quality, would make things easier


written by darkrowan  | 1 year 9 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Awarding BicycleRepairMan with one star point for this contribution to Sift Talk - declared quality by darkrowan.


written by siftbot  | 1 year 9 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Oh please yes... please indeed... I have a feeling I'll be requeing a bit in the future


written by spoco2  | 1 year 9 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Hell yeahs dude, requeue buttons!!??
*sticky!


written by choggie  | 1 year 9 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Stickying this post at the top of Sift Talk - sticky requested by choggie.


written by siftbot  | 1 year 9 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
If we did that how would we denote that it was a re-sifted video.

I for one vote for a hangman's noose where S I F T Y is slowly spelled out, at 5 you just gotta let go of the dream.

*sticky ^ 2


written by James Roe  | 1 year 9 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 15  | flag spam (0)
Post is already stickied - ignoring sticky request by James Roe.


written by siftbot  | 1 year 9 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Yeah, sifty is a conversation killer. All business, no leather....


written by dystopianfuturetoday  | 1 year 9 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
It would work better if the little gray box over the comment field that shows the possible invocations were links that could be used to perform the action.


written by dag  | 1 year 9 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 16  | flag spam (0)
This was already mentioned before, and was subsequently shot down, though I can't remember why. Allot of the con arguments were that some people didn't upvote a 5 time requeue. well a 4 or 5 time requeue used to be either 16 or 20 days in the queue. Now its only 8 or 10. But I'm with lucky, we need SOME sort of method to determine how many times the video was requeued. What Dag suggested is a good idea, though the only downside to that i can see is that some people like to be creative with their *invocations, in how they word them, and that would make those people sad ehh, but who cares about them though. However, clicky buttons would be nice for the admin stuff, (dead, sticky, etc) but the channels should remain a user *invocation, so people can explain why they added a video to a certain channel, or why someone removed a video from a certain channel.


written by Arsenault185  | 1 year 9 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Couldnt you have a limited number of rq's and a button that says 4..3..2..1 requeue left..? I have no idea how technically difficult this stuff is, I'm just throwint things out there. alternatively it could just stop working after 4 clicks..


written by BicycleRepairMan  | 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
If we want this place to feature quality and not quantity I think we should make it 3 requeues max.

Who is with me?

Don“t care if it is through a limited button or just a witty siftbot comment that slaps a wet eel in your face when you try to requeue a fourth time...


written by maatc  | 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
i like it....makes ya look desperate for attention with all the requeue requeue requeue messages, get rid of those too!!!


written by choggie  | 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
So 3 requeues? a total of 6 days? Well whatever is decided, keep in mind that under the old rule of 4 days, it was not uncommon to see a video being requeued 3 times.


written by Arsenault185  | 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
>> ^dag:
It would work better if the little gray box over the comment field that shows the possible invocations were links that could be used to perform the action.


Yeah, I suggested this back in the "what do you want to see in 3.0" thread. I have trouble typing out "requeue" sometimes.

Make it like the quote link, so it just pops *invocation right down into the comment or something.


written by JAPR  | 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I for one lobbied for this awhile back, and indeed was shot down.

But now with 12 hour turn around, my vids are getting pretty thick with requeue request and sift bot replies. A button would be BRILLIANT! Possibly a ticker of some sort? a subscript number, quietly out of the way, but noticeable if you were looking for it?

my .02 worth


written by youdiejoe  | 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
It would work better if the little gray box over the comment field that shows the possible invocations were links that could be used to perform the action.

BINGO!


written by dystopianfuturetoday  | 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
Time to * unsticky, no?


written by maatc  | 1 year 9 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Glad this got resolved so elegantly.


written by Krupo  | 1 year 9 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment

Connect with Facebook
          - OR -
log in or register to submit new comment


Sift Talk is a discussion area for our members. Feel free to post and respond to issues about VideoSift, our community, or online videos in the news.

Top Sift for Nov 9th, 2009

Newest Channel Talk Posts
Video Hosts
We accept video submissions from the below hosts. If your favorite video provider is not available, please contact us to suggest it.
Top 15 Sifters of All Time
1. Zifnab  (54620 votes)
2. arvana  (44982 votes)
3. dystopianfuturetoday  (43408 votes)
4. kronosposeidon  (40333 votes)
5. NetRunner  (39536 votes)
6. blankfist  (37331 votes)
7. ant  (34904 votes)
8. mintbbb  (31842 votes)
9. Farhad2000  (31716 votes)
10. eric3579  (30513 votes)
11. rasch187  (30057 votes)
12. Issykitty  (27198 votes)
13. mlx  (21712 votes)
14. deputydog  (21072 votes)
15. Fedquip  (20893 votes)
Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week
1. Sagemind  (433 votes)
2. Ornthoron  (393 votes)
3. EndAll  (380 votes)
4. demon_ix  (365 votes)
5. MikesHL13  (323 votes)
6. arvana  (310 votes)
7. ant  (267 votes)
8. gwiz665  (246 votes)
9. Zifnab  (207 votes)
10. Duckman33  (201 votes)
11. Issykitty  (200 votes)
12. EDD  (175 votes)
13. lovelynotes  (169 votes)
14. laura  (167 votes)
15. reiwan  (165 votes)