Patting myself on the back
posted by aaronfr 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago • 135 views
Not really much of an accomplishment, but I feel special anyway: I made it into the top 100 users (by votes). Sitting pretty right now at 99. And well on my way to 50 videos and a gold star so that I can get my own collective started. It's the small things in life.

bookmarks (0)
Comments subscribe to this feed
i've read that many people who reach the top 20 end up "missing"...


written by deathcow  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
66 days ago dag announced that there were 6,000 members.

http://www.videosift.com/talk/6000th-member

I count 219 stars at this point.

So, the top 100 is a rather active group.

There are some folks who've participated longer but maybe don't have as many videos published. Then of course dead videos have eaten away at sifters' totals.

So, you've got 19 to go before you're a goldie. 'Glad you're enthusiastic.


written by dotdude  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
shhh, no one talks about the missing people.... sifty might get you


written by James Roe  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
That explains the chainsaw.


written by dotdude  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Early congrats


written by Farhad2000  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Missing! Ulp!


written by Zifnab  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Crap... I'm only number 50. I'm half as good as Aaronfr!


written by karaidl  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Is there a way to view sifters sorted by their total votes / by total videos?


written by deathcow  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I'm not sure I followed that, Deathcow.


written by karaidl  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Click on Top Users on the main page and you can sort how-ever you want using the different columns:

http://www.videosift.com/topusers.php



written by Zifnab  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I don't understand the breakdown on that page on a couple of numbers. On our profile it has our rank and total votes, but it's not the same number thats on the top users page.

ehem...and I broke into the elite 15 this weekend. I'm SURE it won't last...but it's nice to say I was there a least a few days


written by swampgirl  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I'm saying sort the sifters by "Quality"... a person with 10 published videos earning 1000 votes having a "quality" of 100, and a person with 10 published videos and 120 votes having a quality of 12... so ranking people by the average popularity of what they post... Ordering sifters by their average votes per published video.


written by deathcow  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I second what Deathcow said.


written by Farhad2000  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
You guys know this has been brought up over and over again, right? Brian and James say they're working on it.

And as long as we're patting ourselves on the back here, I would have almost 36 votes per vid, not including queued and Sift Talk posts.


written by karaidl  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
no sorry i dont pay attention to sifttalk much


written by deathcow  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
thanks for the congrats and the info about the top users page, had no idea it was there. just for the record, i'm at about 20 votes/video. not bad, not great.


written by aaronfr  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Taking out Sift Talk posts and queued vids, you're actually at 23.74.


written by karaidl  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
i don't agree with deathcow and farhad. having rank based only on the quality (votes/videos), would get fewer videos posted (you wouldn't post if you weren't sure it would get A LOT of votes), so fewer videos to watch for all sifters.

Moreover, there would be the very WRONG situation where a discarded video is better than a video who gets only 10 votes.

The votes/video value is nice, but definitly not as a primary ranking system.

It would also be very nice to have a (published videos/all videos posted) value (i.e. "Published ratio"). But this would bring a little problem: it would be bad to count videos discarded because they are dupes, in this value.


written by looris  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
ah, if it ain't broke..don't fix it. (shakes cane)


written by swampgirl  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
SHE'S GOT A CANE!! RUN!!!


written by karaidl  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
ahahahha


written by looris  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
eh? sunny?


written by swampgirl  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Well done aaronfr, you'll make it to the top in no time.


written by Fedquip  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Can anybody spare me a little free time? I promise I won't use it on alcohol.


written by doremifa  | 1 year 2 months 3 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment
log in or register to submit new comment