It's your job, now, to flame, (or whatever,) Video Sift and FORCE them to allow EQUAL treatment to ALL PUBLISHERS!!! Or, REFUSE TO VIST THEIR SITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They are promoting a radical "George Bush only," attitude amongst their members. "Agree, or get prohibited from making a comment against our beliefs." (Writers opinionated paraphrase.)
Nevertheless, it's true!!!
Attempt to vote AGAINST something you disagree with, (as a new member,) and YOU'LL FIND you're not allowed!
IMMEDIATELY, vote FOR the same thing and see if they don't accept it!!!
THAT'S PREJUDICIAL, in my, (or anybody else's,) book!!!
It creates an UNFAIR number of votes FOR, while NOT ALLOWING votes against!!!
EVERYBODY; contact this site and complain about the inherent prejudice in their voting. Boycott them, if necessary.
DO NOT ALLOW THIS TO STAND!!!
They are promoting a radical "George Bush only," attitude amongst their members. "Agree, or get prohibited from making a comment against our beliefs." (Writers opinionated paraphrase.)
Nevertheless, it's true!!!
Attempt to vote AGAINST something you disagree with, (as a new member,) and YOU'LL FIND you're not allowed!
IMMEDIATELY, vote FOR the same thing and see if they don't accept it!!!
THAT'S PREJUDICIAL, in my, (or anybody else's,) book!!!
It creates an UNFAIR number of votes FOR, while NOT ALLOWING votes against!!!
EVERYBODY; contact this site and complain about the inherent prejudice in their voting. Boycott them, if necessary.
DO NOT ALLOW THIS TO STAND!!!







































but anyway how was he banned with only one * ban? siftbot is taking over!
http://www.videosift.com/video/How-Arthur-Became-King-of-the-Britons-Holy-Grail
This is especially funny since the particular video he is railing against is more anti-Bush than anything.
He must be from *Bancroft or *Bangkok or maybe *Bancouver.
or *banstead, it's in southern england, birthplace of dick *ban dyke.
Ah, Mr. Bag was *banned on this post.
http://www.videosift.com/talk/forced-position-torture-1
http://www.videosift.com/talk/Forced-torture-psition
http://www.videosift.com/talk/forced-position-torture
http://www.videosift.com/video/Unsubscribe-Me-from-Forced-Position-Torture
Sigh.
Can be a warning for the "candidate to banishment". Being tased prevent him from posting anything for a week, and all its attempt to comment within this period are changed to "Aaarg !" or some sort of pain scream.
I totally support the *tase, though.
Read his other three posts. It then becomes clear he only created his account to tell VideoSift to fuck off. I'd *ban him again if I had to. No doubt he'll come back to say something about
"Not only they promote torture, they silence you for speaking out against it!"
and this works, I guess, since if they send insult mails instead, they would have been problematic users, while if they do apologize, they have learned something they wouldn't learn as well otherwise
*tase i say.
Then there's this guy - he's obviously no-shit-for-real insane. I did explain to him why he can't downvote, and he told me he knew that, but still says VS as pro-torture.
I told him "Um, sift ten videos, then you can vote it down." To which he responded with "I know the previous because when they REFUSED my "vote it down;" in the interests of science, I attempted to "vote it up."
He then proceeded to tell us to go kill people - and he wasn't joking about it. May I point out the following excerpts?
"This ABSOLUTELY PROVES Video Sift is predjidiced IN FAVOR OF TORTURE!!!"
"THEY INSTANTLY ACCEPTED MY VOTE IN FAVOR OF TORTURE"
"Video sift supports, "forced position torture!"
There are NO TWO WAYS ABOUT IT!!!"
I would pull the quote advocating murder and assassination, but it was in the post he got *banned on.
Lucky, can we get that one pulled back up for reference purposes?
you NEVER know what people are thinking after you read their text on the net.
however, trying this 4 times is not funny and is definitely banworthy.
Face it sifters: dumb people do exist.