Quick Options

NSFW Content:
Listing Mode:
Coloring Style:
Animations:

◀ Quick Options    Login    Register
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
It's your job, now, to flame, (or whatever,) Video Sift and FORCE them to allow EQUAL treatment to ALL PUBLISHERS!!! Or, REFUSE TO VIST THEIR SITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They are promoting a radical "George Bush only," attitude amongst their members. "Agree, or get prohibited from making a comment against our beliefs." (Writers opinionated paraphrase.)
Nevertheless, it's true!!!

Attempt to vote AGAINST something you disagree with, (as a new member,) and YOU'LL FIND you're not allowed!

IMMEDIATELY, vote FOR the same thing and see if they don't accept it!!!

THAT'S PREJUDICIAL, in my, (or anybody else's,) book!!!

It creates an UNFAIR number of votes FOR, while NOT ALLOWING votes against!!!

EVERYBODY; contact this site and complain about the inherent prejudice in their voting. Boycott them, if necessary.

DO NOT ALLOW THIS TO STAND!!!
Comments subscribe to this feed
Be *banished. Four fucking posts? Go the fuck away. VideoSift doesn't promote anything. If you would have taken the time to fucking notice, most people here are anti-Bush, even it's (correct me if I'm wrong, Dag) creator. That, and you can't down vote ANY video as a new member.


written by MarineGunrock  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
joubaur has been nominated for banination by MarineGunrock. This may be due to abuse or violations of the posting guidelines. If this nomination is seconded, the account will be permanently disabled.


written by siftbot  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
this is funny, i like this guy, let's keep him.


written by MINK  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 4  | flag spam (0)
hahaha read it again, still funny, this is so *quality.


written by MINK  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 -1  | flag spam (0)
Awarding joubaur with one star point for this contribution to Sift Talk - declared quality by MINK.


written by siftbot  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
*ban


written by karaidl  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
joubaur cannot be banned because joubaur's account is already terminated - ignoring ban request by karaidl.


written by siftbot  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
eh? siftbot? what do you mean? how was it terminated without two * bans?


written by MINK  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Someone has his head up his ass. *ban


written by Issykitty  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
joubaur cannot be banned because joubaur's account is already terminated - ignoring ban request by Issykitty.


written by siftbot  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Just thought I'd ban him again! So there, Siftbot! Ahahaha!!!


written by Issykitty  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
This is funny. "George Bush only attitude" hilarious. He's obviously not hung around the Sift much.


written by dag  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 3  | flag spam (0)
i call *sockpuppet or *hospital

but anyway how was he banned with only one * ban? siftbot is taking over!


written by MINK  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Oh man! That was a good laugh! LOL! Yeah you can't downvote until you prove your not an internet troll! What a horrible idea. ROFL!


written by K0MMIE  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 5  | flag spam (0)
There may have been an admin ban- but not from me. Regardless, his *banination was imminent anyway.


written by dag  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
joubaur cannot be banned because joubaur's account is already terminated - ignoring ban request by dag.


written by siftbot  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Some sort of accident has happened. He must have joined some bizarrosift from an alternate universe. I'm sure they're all pro-Bush conservatives there. Clearly he's still confused. We need to help this man. If we create enough *bans, maybe we can open a portal for his return.


written by swampgirl  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 11  | flag spam (0)
joubaur cannot be banned because joubaur's account is already terminated - ignoring ban request by swampgirl.


written by siftbot  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
joubaur wrote:
Come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help! Help! I'm being repressed!

http://www.videosift.com/video/How-Arthur-Became-King-of-the-Britons-Holy-Grail


written by Grimm  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 9  | flag spam (0)
let's tase him.


written by MINK  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 10  | flag spam (0)
Don't tase him, bro!

This is especially funny since the particular video he is railing against is more anti-Bush than anything.

He must be from *Bancroft or *Bangkok or maybe *Bancouver.


written by arvana  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 3  | flag spam (0)
joubaur cannot be banned because joubaur's account is already terminated - ignoring ban request by arvana.


written by siftbot  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
*bangladesh maybe?

or *banstead, it's in southern england, birthplace of dick *ban dyke.


written by MINK  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
joubaur cannot be banned because joubaur's account is already terminated - ignoring ban request by MINK.


written by siftbot  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I think he is from Vulgaria...


written by maatc  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
*ban, but if I was a diamond, I'd *sticky this.


written by Fjnbk  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Invocations (sticky) cannot be called by Fjnbk because Fjnbk is not privileged - sorry.


written by siftbot  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Hmm... I pulled the *ban card on one of his other three posts, but it wasn't seconded that I know of... lemme go look.

Ah, Mr. Bag was *banned on this post.


written by MarineGunrock  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
joubaur cannot be banned because joubaur's account is already terminated - ignoring ban request by MarineGunrock.


written by siftbot  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
And for your reference, here are the other posts:

http://www.videosift.com/talk/forced-position-torture-1
http://www.videosift.com/talk/Forced-torture-psition
http://www.videosift.com/talk/forced-position-torture


written by MarineGunrock  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I don't understand - what was the original problem? I can't back track to figure out what video he's talking about...


written by gargoyle  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
This is the one:
http://www.videosift.com/video/Unsubscribe-Me-from-Forced-Position-Torture


written by MarineGunrock  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
so joubaur wanted to downvote, couldn't and had a fit? What part of that video was pro-bush?

Sigh.


written by gargoyle  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
Nice Mink. We totally need a *tase invocation.


written by dag  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 5  | flag spam (0)
QM almost had a friend.


written by Fedquip  | 2 years 1 week ago | CH
 7  | flag spam (0)
Agree with the *tase invocation.
Can be a warning for the "candidate to banishment". Being tased prevent him from posting anything for a week, and all its attempt to comment within this period are changed to "Aaarg !" or some sort of pain scream.


written by 8756  | 2 years ago | CH
 6  | flag spam (0)
HA! I really like the *tase invocation idea. Very sift-ish, if i do say so myself.


written by djsunkid  | 2 years ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
To be realistic, one (randomly selected) out of every few hundred of the sifters who receive a *tase should be permanently banned.


written by fullerenedream  | 2 years ago | CH
 5  | flag spam (0)
Like the tase invocation idea.


written by Eklek  | 2 years ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Uh... did anyone try to calmly explain the site to this guy, or at least redirect him to the FAQ before banning him? Or was there some larger issue aside from him being confused? Were we perhaps a little too quick to ban with this one? I mean, from all I see, it seems as if he was just confused as to the nature of the site... perhaps a little crazy maybe, but really, just confused.


written by raven  | 2 years ago | CH
 4  | flag spam (0)
fullerenedream: That's harsh.

I totally support the *tase, though.


written by gwiz665  | 2 years ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
am i too late to hop on the banwagon?


written by E_Nygma  | 2 years ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
@Raven: Aren't reading the FAQ and guidelines part of the registration process? Isn't there a box you have to check that says you read them?

Read his other three posts. It then becomes clear he only created his account to tell VideoSift to fuck off. I'd *ban him again if I had to. No doubt he'll come back to say something about
"Not only they promote torture, they silence you for speaking out against it!"


written by MarineGunrock  | 2 years ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
joubaur cannot be banned because joubaur's account is already terminated - ignoring ban request by MarineGunrock.


written by siftbot  | 2 years ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I am totally in favor of the *tase


written by smibbo  | 2 years ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
FEMA posted this


written by deathcow  | 2 years ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
@raven: as far as I've noticed, the standard procedure is ban problematic newbs, and unban them if they let dag know they have understood the mistake.

and this works, I guess, since if they send insult mails instead, they would have been problematic users, while if they do apologize, they have learned something they wouldn't learn as well otherwise


written by looris  | 2 years ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
raven i don't think you understand, he was in a state of excited delirium and he was putting sifters' safety at risk, i mean wtf, would you prefer we SHOOT the guy? quit whining.

*tase i say.


written by MINK  | 2 years ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
screw that looris, first they crawl back to dag, then they grovel before a committee, then a panel of 3 judges, it's thumbs up or down.....after, we see if they float.....


written by choggie  | 2 years ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
fine... far be it from to try and reason with an angry mob... have yer fun, run em all out of town, heaven forbid we encourage any more insane/potentially interesting and amusing people in providing us with entertainment for any more time than it takes to toss a ban command their way.


written by raven  | 2 years ago | CH
 3  | flag spam (0)
There's a distinct difference between the types of insane - Take choggie's (no offense, my good man)brand - humorous, intelligent, good-natured and a bit cryptic.
Then there's this guy - he's obviously no-shit-for-real insane. I did explain to him why he can't downvote, and he told me he knew that, but still says VS as pro-torture.
I told him "Um, sift ten videos, then you can vote it down." To which he responded with "I know the previous because when they REFUSED my "vote it down;" in the interests of science, I attempted to "vote it up."
He then proceeded to tell us to go kill people - and he wasn't joking about it. May I point out the following excerpts?
"This ABSOLUTELY PROVES Video Sift is predjidiced IN FAVOR OF TORTURE!!!"
"THEY INSTANTLY ACCEPTED MY VOTE IN FAVOR OF TORTURE"
"Video sift supports, "forced position torture!"
There are NO TWO WAYS ABOUT IT!!!"

I would pull the quote advocating murder and assassination, but it was in the post he got *banned on.

Lucky, can we get that one pulled back up for reference purposes?


written by MarineGunrock  | 2 years ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
joubaur cannot be banned because joubaur's account is already terminated - ignoring ban request by MarineGunrock.


written by siftbot  | 2 years ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
MG... if i wanted to write a hilarious british style sarcastic joke about videosift... it would read almost EXACTLY like this guy's post.

you NEVER know what people are thinking after you read their text on the net.

however, trying this 4 times is not funny and is definitely banworthy.


written by MINK  | 2 years ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Yeah, once would have been satirical. Even funny, if we knew it was a joke. But you'd have to have been here for more than 3 hours for us to know you to tell it was a joke, and not done it four times.


written by MarineGunrock  | 2 years ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
It was clearly not a joke.

Face it sifters: dumb people do exist.


written by looris  | 2 years ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
now it's a joke.


written by MINK  | 2 years ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment

Connect with Facebook
          - OR -
log in or register to submit new comment


who has this post bookmarked
looris  - Fjnbk  - Grimm  - MINK

Sift Talk is a discussion area for our members. Feel free to post and respond to issues about VideoSift, our community, or online videos in the news.

Top Sift for Dec 1st, 2009

Newest Channel Talk Posts
Video Hosts
We accept video submissions from the below hosts. If your favorite video provider is not available, please contact us to suggest it.
Top 15 Sifters of All Time
1. Zifnab  (55083 votes)
2. arvana  (46725 votes)
3. dystopianfuturetoday  (44357 votes)
4. kronosposeidon  (40998 votes)
5. NetRunner  (39978 votes)
6. blankfist  (37568 votes)
7. ant  (35670 votes)
8. Farhad2000  (31860 votes)
9. mintbbb  (31860 votes)
10. rasch187  (30956 votes)
11. eric3579  (30610 votes)
12. Issykitty  (27398 votes)
13. mlx  (21768 votes)
14. deputydog  (21147 votes)
15. Fedquip  (20930 votes)
Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week
1. arvana  (844 votes)
2. MikesHL13  (450 votes)
3. oxdottir  (309 votes)
4. necrontyr  (291 votes)
5. deathcow  (214 votes)
6. rasch187  (210 votes)
7. demon_ix  (204 votes)
8. Sagemind  (203 votes)
9. Deano  (177 votes)
10. dystopianfuturetoday  (166 votes)
11. brycewi19  (158 votes)
12. Duckman33  (158 votes)
13. JesseoftheNorth  (146 votes)
14. blankfist  (136 votes)
15. gwiz665  (130 votes)