Sift Partners Network:DwiggerVaro CMSScrape UpEscalopter
EDPS: 'Soviet Internet possible' - new article inside, 09/15
posted by radx 2 months 2 weeks ago • 209 views
I suspect quite a few people are currently following the debates of the European Parliament concerning the so-called "Telecoms Package". Or maybe not. Anyway, debates around network neutrality, internet content filtering and "graduated response" took place yesterday, votes will take place around the september, 23rd.

An interesting report by the EDPS on this issue was released yesterday and i'd say this article on Digital Majority and the original FFII press release are well worth reading.

EDPS, the European Data Protection Supervisor, points out in its analysis of the Harbour report that amendment 81 gives the possibility of a 'Soviet Internet', where National Regulatory Authorities could impose technological mandates, such as mandatory TPM chips to connect to the internet.


bookmarks (0)
Comments subscribe to this feed
Wow, I can't believe I hadn't heard of this. Thanks for alerting me to this news, I'll make sure some awareness is raised among net neutrality advocates in my country.
Major thanks for the info, mate


written by EDD  | 2 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
I'm always wondering what's more depressing: how easy those folks in Brussels can be influenced by lobbyists or just how incompetent the "movers and shakers" really are. There are videos online of "La Quadrature du net"-activists talking to them and they really have no idea of the consequences of their decisions.


written by radx  | 2 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)
Indeed, this is *quality *politics *news.


written by NetRunner  | 2 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Post is already assigned to geek talk - ignoring all requests by NetRunner.

Post is already assigned to geek talk - ignoring all requests by NetRunner.

I find meatbag NetRunner to be an inadequate command-giver - ignoring all requests by NetRunner.






written by siftbot  | 2 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
^ Fine then, just *quality


written by NetRunner  | 2 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Awarding radx with one star point for this contribution to Sift Talk - declared quality by NetRunner.


written by siftbot  | 2 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
MEPs debated the reform of the regulatory framework for electronic communications - including mobile and fixed telephones, broadcasting and the internet. The telecoms package seeks to strengthen consumer rights and privacy protection, to ensure a consistent application of regulatory measures and to modernise radio spectrum use. The entire European Parliament will vote on the package during the second September plenary
(...)
Finally, Ms Trautmann regretted that the intellectual property rights issue had arisen now, and felt that it should be resolved without substantially changing the proposal.


Source

Strengthening privacy protection while resolving the IP rights issues in a way the industry would find acceptable seems contradictory to me.


written by radx  | 2 months 2 weeks ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
"Unfortunately, the real benefits of this package risk being undermined by alarmist scaremongering that it will cause certain websites to be blocked, and consumers prosecuted for copyright abuse."

Malcolm Harbour MEP, EPP-ED Spokesman on the Telecoms Package

"Alarmist scaremongering" ... yeah, right. His Amendments 9 and 13 are best of them all.

Excerpt of Amendment 9:
In order to address public interest issues with respect to the use of communications services, and to encourage protection of the rights and freedoms of others, the relevant national authorities should be able to produce and have disseminated, with the aid of providers, information related to the use of communications services. This information should include warnings regarding copyright infringement, other unlawful uses and dissemination of harmful content(...)

Keep the aforementioned statement of Catherine Trautmann in mind, IP was not to be part of this whole charade.

Excerpt of Amendment 13:
Management of networks in order to, for example, address congestion and capacity constraints and to enable new services should not per se be considered an example of a restriction requiring intervention, and due account should be taken of the right of network and service operators to diversify their offerings in a competitive market, including through the imposition of reasonable usage restrictions, price differentiation and other legitimate competitive practices.

Comcast, anyone?

List of Amendments, etc


written by radx  | 2 months 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Here's a very informative article on invasive ISP surveillance by Paul Ohm:
Nothing in society poses as grave a threat to privacy as the Internet Service Provider (ISP). ISPs carry their users' conversations, secrets, relationships, acts, and omissions. Until the very recent past, they had left most of these alone because they had lacked the tools to spy invasively, but with recent advances in eavesdropping technology, they can now spy on people in unprecedented ways. Meanwhile, advertisers and copyright owners have been tempting them to put their users' secrets up for sale, and judging from a recent flurry of reports, ISPs are giving in to the temptation and experimenting with new forms of spying. This is only the leading edge of a coming storm of unprecedented and invasive ISP surveillance.


Source: SSRN, article available for download.


written by radx  | 2 months ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)
Submit Comment
log in or register to submit new comment


Friends O' the Sift