Comments for "Wolf Blitzer: Will The Syrian Ambassador Deny WMD's?" Video at VideoSift.com

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:53:01 -0700

Moving this video to marinara's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 3 days.

By kulpims

kulpims (http://www.videosift.com/member/kulpims) — Mon, 05 May 2008 10:25:46 -0700

this is getting silly

By Constitutional_Patriot

Constitutional_Patriot (http://patriot.videosift.com) — Tue, 13 May 2008 21:55:35 -0700

*promote

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Tue, 13 May 2008 21:55:36 -0700

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued - promote requested by Constitutional_Patriot.

By choggie

choggie (http://www.videosift.com/member/choggie) — Thu, 15 May 2008 11:07:51 -0700

The very idea, that most of the imbeciles who still use the WMD defense for why America went or shouldn't have been went to Iraq, or anywhere, in mind-numbingly mundane and sophomoric...remedial, that that's one of the only justifications used for why we should not have gone.....while all the while in denial as to the real reasons behind our involvement....Because the same assholes that are giving you your next president use such tripe as distraction-

Fucka WMD, do I need to find them to know that someone like Kim Jung Il should be immediately assassinated, NK's peoples' freed from a lifetime mindfuck???

All for some country(United State of Texas?) dropping a pair, and systematically, against all Geneva edicts, and in the face of worldwide protest from any superpower, go about the task of cleaning the rubbish in human form from the planet.....Start with the top ten Dictators, with the caveat that, as soon as we are finnished with them, we are coming for those who used them to their own financial and geopolitical positioning for the New world Order....You hear that Bush???...Yes, kill him and his entire family, if given the chance.....

By choggie

choggie (http://www.videosift.com/member/choggie) — Thu, 15 May 2008 11:13:25 -0700

Oh and, good on ya Israel, again, you give them the toys and then bitch when they use them in a righteous, justifiable manner....fucking anti-Semites....wish I had one here right now-and while we're at it, fuck Palestine-you both need to drop the baggage handed down by the throwbacks you call ancestors, and learn to smile and play nice......*as China sits back and smiles the 1000 yr smile-Syria needs nuclear power like a toddler needs a shotgun-This Syrian Ambassador sounds very similar to (insert US political talking head here)

By Trancecoach

Trancecoach (http://www.videosift.com/member/Trancecoach) — Thu, 15 May 2008 11:48:09 -0700

Sounds to me that the Syrian Ambassador is trying to be as honest as possible. But that shouldn't deter the U.S. administration from accusing him of lying and invading Syria to serve their own imperial interests.

By bcglorf

bcglorf (http://www.videosift.com/member/bcglorf) — Thu, 15 May 2008 14:21:18 -0700

Boo on Blitzer for not asking the most important question. Why, after the bombing, did Syria remain silent? If Israel was/is lying or had bad intel, Israel's silence makes sense, Syria's does not. It certainly seems that Syria had something to hide here, or else they'd have immediately made a very big noise over such an overt act of war. Instead, they were even more quite than Israel about admitting anything had happened. Me thinks the empty building story is lacking.