http://www.videosift.com/video/What-would-Super-Mario-Bros-look-like-on-Atari-2600 VideoSift: Online Video *Quality Control (2 comments listed) en 2008 videosift.com Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:01:10 -0800 http://www.varocms.com http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification 10 http://static1.videosift.com/videosift/i/sifter_small.gifhttp://www.videosift.com/video/What-would-Super-Mario-Bros-look-like-on-Atari-2600 http://www.videosift.com/video/What-would-Super-Mario-Bros-look-like-on-Atari-2600#comment-342093 The 2600 could not do those legs on the mushroom guys. Resolution was only 192 x 160.<br /><br /> budzos (http://www.videosift.com/member/budzos)http://www.videosift.com/video/What-would-Super-Mario-Bros-look-like-on-Atari-2600#comment-342093 Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:16:03 -0800 http://www.videosift.com/video/What-would-Super-Mario-Bros-look-like-on-Atari-2600#comment-342120 Yeah - I don't think people remember just how underpowered a 2600 was. There's no way you'd get smooth scrolling, tons of objects on-screen, and great sound like you see in this demo. Look at <a rel="nofollow" href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=HL2p2ANFlQ4&feature=related">Pac-man</a> on the 2600 - way fewer objects and level detail, and still a miracle that it ran.<br /><br /> jmzero (http://www.videosift.com/member/jmzero)http://www.videosift.com/video/What-would-Super-Mario-Bros-look-like-on-Atari-2600#comment-342120 Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:01:10 -0800