Comments for "Requeue button" Talk at VideoSift.com

By Sarzy

Sarzy (http://sarzy.videosift.com) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:51:40 -0800

That is a really, really good suggestion. Honestly, unless it's technically hard to implement, I don't see why anyone would have a problem with this. I'd *quality this post, but I don't believe I have the points.

By siftbot

siftbot (http://siftbot.videosift.com) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:51:41 -0800

Sarzy cannot award a quality point for this Sift Talk post because Sarzy does not have enough Power Points - ignoring quality request by Sarzy.

By darkrowan

darkrowan (http://www.videosift.com/member/darkrowan) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:03:30 -0800

*quality, would make things easier

By siftbot

siftbot (http://siftbot.videosift.com) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:03:30 -0800

Awarding BicycleRepairMan with one star point for this contribution to Sift Talk - declared quality by darkrowan.

By spoco2

spoco2 (http://www.videosift.com/member/spoco2) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:26:31 -0800

Oh please yes... please indeed... I have a feeling I'll be requeing a bit in the future

By choggie

choggie (http://www.videosift.com/member/choggie) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:40:54 -0800

Hell yeahs dude, requeue buttons!!??
*sticky!

By siftbot

siftbot (http://siftbot.videosift.com) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:40:55 -0800

Stickying this post at the top of Sift Talk - sticky requested by choggie.

By James Roe

James Roe (http://jamesroe.videosift.com) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:36:30 -0800

If we did that how would we denote that it was a re-sifted video.

I for one vote for a hangman's noose where S I F T Y is slowly spelled out, at 5 you just gotta let go of the dream.

*sticky ^ 2

By siftbot

siftbot (http://siftbot.videosift.com) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:36:30 -0800

Post is already stickied - ignoring sticky request by James Roe.

By dystopianfuturetoday

dystopianfuturetoday (http://www.videosift.com/member/dystopianfuturetoday) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:22:53 -0800

Yeah, sifty is a conversation killer. All business, no leather....

By dag

dag (http://dag.videosift.com) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:29:59 -0800

It would work better if the little gray box over the comment field that shows the possible invocations were links that could be used to perform the action.

By Arsenault185

Arsenault185 (http://www.videosift.com/member/Arsenault185) — Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:53:44 -0800

This was already mentioned before, and was subsequently shot down, though I can't remember why. Allot of the con arguments were that some people didn't upvote a 5 time requeue. well a 4 or 5 time requeue used to be either 16 or 20 days in the queue. Now its only 8 or 10. But I'm with lucky, we need SOME sort of method to determine how many times the video was requeued. What Dag suggested is a good idea, though the only downside to that i can see is that some people like to be creative with their *invocations, in how they word them, and that would make those people sad ehh, but who cares about them though. However, clicky buttons would be nice for the admin stuff, (dead, sticky, etc) but the channels should remain a user *invocation, so people can explain why they added a video to a certain channel, or why someone removed a video from a certain channel.

By BicycleRepairMan

BicycleRepairMan (http://www.videosift.com/member/BicycleRepairMan) — Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:14:21 -0800

Couldnt you have a limited number of rq's and a button that says 4..3..2..1 requeue left..? I have no idea how technically difficult this stuff is, I'm just throwint things out there. alternatively it could just stop working after 4 clicks..

By maatc

maatc (http://maatc.videosift.com) — Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:58:36 -0800

If we want this place to feature quality and not quantity I think we should make it 3 requeues max.

Who is with me?

Don´t care if it is through a limited button or just a witty siftbot comment that slaps a wet eel in your face when you try to requeue a fourth time...

By choggie

choggie (http://www.videosift.com/member/choggie) — Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:48:57 -0800

i like it....makes ya look desperate for attention with all the requeue requeue requeue messages, get rid of those too!!!

By Arsenault185

Arsenault185 (http://www.videosift.com/member/Arsenault185) — Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:39:44 -0800

So 3 requeues? a total of 6 days? Well whatever is decided, keep in mind that under the old rule of 4 days, it was not uncommon to see a video being requeued 3 times.

By JAPR

JAPR (http://www.videosift.com/member/JAPR) — Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:08:50 -0800

>> ^dag:
It would work better if the little gray box over the comment field that shows the possible invocations were links that could be used to perform the action.

Yeah, I suggested this back in the "what do you want to see in 3.0" thread. I have trouble typing out "requeue" sometimes.

Make it like the quote link, so it just pops *invocation right down into the comment or something.

By youdiejoe

youdiejoe (http://youdiejoe.videosift.com) — Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:35:01 -0800

I for one lobbied for this awhile back, and indeed was shot down.

But now with 12 hour turn around, my vids are getting pretty thick with requeue request and sift bot replies. A button would be BRILLIANT! Possibly a ticker of some sort? a subscript number, quietly out of the way, but noticeable if you were looking for it?

my .02 worth

By dystopianfuturetoday

dystopianfuturetoday (http://www.videosift.com/member/dystopianfuturetoday) — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:56:32 -0800

It would work better if the little gray box over the comment field that shows the possible invocations were links that could be used to perform the action.

BINGO!

By maatc

maatc (http://maatc.videosift.com) — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:27:54 -0800

Time to * unsticky, no?

By Krupo

Krupo (http://krupo.videosift.com) — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:44:45 -0800

Glad this got resolved so elegantly.