Comments for "Pubic Hair Fashion Designs" Video at VideoSift.com

By rembar

rembar (http://www.videosift.com/member/rembar) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:29:11 -0700

Oh you have got to be fucking with me.

By MarineGunrock

MarineGunrock (http://marinegunrock.videosift.com) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:33:15 -0700

Definitely gonna hafta *blog this.

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:33:15 -0700

This video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - blog requested by MarineGunrock.

By gorgonheap

gorgonheap (http://www.videosift.com/member/gorgonheap) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:37:51 -0700

Porn should be *banished I say.

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:37:51 -0700

landshark has been nominated for banination by gorgonheap. This may be due to abuse or violations of the posting guidelines. If this nomination is seconded, the account will be permanently disabled.

By MarineGunrock

MarineGunrock (http://marinegunrock.videosift.com) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:42:15 -0700

Hmm.. Inappropriate? Maybe. But is it really porn? I mean, they aren't having intercourse. They aren't modeling so you can see their body. Just the crotch styles. I would move for a +discard, but not necessarily a +ban.

By jonny

jonny (http://www.videosift.com/member/jonny) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:42:23 -0700

How is that porn? Nudity != porn.

This is crazy for sure, but I vote it stays. Definitely not ban-worthy.

[edit] - Why even discard it? Let the queue work.

[edit2] - In fact, I want to *return it, so I can vote!

By jonny

jonny (http://www.videosift.com/member/jonny) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:44:29 -0700

I never remember that edited invocations don't work. *return

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:44:29 -0700

Returning this video from Sift Talk - return requested by jonny.

By jonny

jonny (http://www.videosift.com/member/jonny) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:45:17 -0700

*blog it back to continue discussion

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:45:17 -0700

This video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - blog requested by jonny.

By rembar

rembar (http://www.videosift.com/member/rembar) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:48:53 -0700

Clearly not porn, by Videosift standards. To paraphrase Dag during a previous Sift Talk, if you're not whackin' it, we're not discardin' it. No question about it.

*return

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:48:53 -0700

Returning this video from Sift Talk - return requested by rembar.

By MINK

MINK (http://www.videosift.com/member/MINK) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:50:54 -0700

what discussion? this is *art and should be *returned.

if this isn't art, then da vinci is a gay pornographer.

if this is porn, i am gonna blog all the 9/11 as snuff.

what kind of a dictionary are you using?

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:50:54 -0700

Adding video to channels (Art) - requested by MINK.

By jonny

jonny (http://www.videosift.com/member/jonny) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:52:19 -0700

And following that line of thought, it probably does not belong in the sexuality channel. It's fashion and *art!

*nochannel *terrible *wtf

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:52:20 -0700

This video has been removed from all channels (Art, Sexuality, Terrible, Wtf) due to invalid channel assignment - nochannel invoked by jonny. Please review the FAQ to learn about appropriate channel assignments.

Adding video to channels (Art, Terrible, Wtf) - requested by jonny.

By jonny

jonny (http://www.videosift.com/member/jonny) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:53:27 -0700

Sifty - I said art before nochannel. guess you don't read like us meatbags.

*nochannel *terrible *wtf

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:53:28 -0700

This video has been removed from all channels (Art, Terrible, Wtf) due to invalid channel assignment - nochannel invoked by jonny. Please review the FAQ to learn about appropriate channel assignments.

Adding video to channels (Terrible, Wtf) - requested by jonny.

By jonny

jonny (http://www.videosift.com/member/jonny) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:54:27 -0700

doh! sorry mink. we're commenting all over each other. *art

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:54:27 -0700

Adding video to channels (Art) - requested by jonny.

By Thylan

Thylan (http://www.videosift.com/member/Thylan) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:55:47 -0700

I'd vote not pr0n. Not erotic either. Definitely wtf. Lots of that.

By landshark

landshark (http://www.videosift.com/member/landshark) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:08:34 -0700

I certainly didn't think it was pr0n or I wouldn't have sifted it. I just thought it had loads and loads of WTF.

But I guess some people have itchy ban fingers.

By dag

dag (http://dag.videosift.com) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:52:05 -0700

Definitely not porn - it passes the wood test with me. No wood is all good.

But seriously, is he trying to say that they grew their pubic hair to those lengths? Some looked to be a bout 4 feet. Surely they were extensions?

By mlx

mlx (http://mlx.videosift.com) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:29:34 -0700

Fantastic...I'll never trim again!

By MarineGunrock

MarineGunrock (http://marinegunrock.videosift.com) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:43:23 -0700

@ dag: That's comedy gold:"No wood is all good"

And mlx:
Please, for the love of men everywhere, Say it ain't so!!!

By dotdude

dotdude (http://dotdude.videosift.com) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:13:22 -0700

Up with art.

By lavoll

lavoll (http://www.videosift.com/member/lavoll) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:57:12 -0700

haha. oh, the ever so controversial female body.

By HaricotVert

HaricotVert (http://www.videosift.com/member/HaricotVert) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:15:21 -0700

Yeah, it can't be porn if watching the video makes one more flaccid.

Gives a whole new meaning to the word "beard."

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:16:21 -0700

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Pubic Hair Bizarre' to 'Pubic Hair, Bizarre, fashion, spoof, parody' - edited by joedirt

By MINK

MINK (http://www.videosift.com/member/MINK) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 03:28:06 -0700

errr. it's *comedy, right? and lol @ the google ads on this one...

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 03:28:07 -0700

Adding video to channels (Comedy) - requested by MINK.

By persephone

persephone (http://www.videosift.com/member/persephone) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:38:25 -0700

Do ya pubes hang low, do they tumble to and fro, can you tie em in a knot, can you tie em in a bow?

Would make interesting beachwear alternatives. You could pull it up through the back and around the waist- a bushy thong!

By sbchapm

sbchapm (http://www.videosift.com/member/sbchapm) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:11:27 -0700

Excellent, and very funny. Well acted. Don't let the current climate get us all banny and worried about lovely ladies and a great comedic piece, please. Thanks, various, for the calm heads (ha) and quick return.

By RedSky

RedSky (http://www.videosift.com/member/RedSky) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:19:09 -0700

Needs to be a boobies tag ...

By ant

ant (http://www.videosift.com/member/ant) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:23:10 -0700

Wow, good thing I didn't see this at work because of the thumbnail shots.

By MarineGunrock

MarineGunrock (http://marinegunrock.videosift.com) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:34:30 -0700

Woo! And Ant downvote! Never saw that coming!

rofl @ haricotvert

And MINK, I don't get ads, what do they say?

By ElessarJD

ElessarJD (http://www.videosift.com/member/ElessarJD) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:56:40 -0700

The only way I can describe my reaction is

By smibbo

smibbo (http://smibbo.videosift.com) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:02:08 -0700

its a viral campaign for Remington

*viral anyone?

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:02:08 -0700

Invocations (viral) cannot be called by smibbo because smibbo is not privileged - sorry.

By choggie

choggie (http://www.videosift.com/member/choggie) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:51:35 -0700

Jesus/God the reactions. reset poor gorgonheap and jonny!!!

It's the end of the goddamn world!

Don't worry landshark....if ya get banned because someone pulls an asterickky by accident, it does not mean they don't hate you. Great Post, but simply can't vote for it-that much human aberration in one room is simply too much-

By raven

raven (http://www.videosift.com/member/raven) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:48:40 -0700

Hilarious! Although I couldn't help but wince a little at the thought of having extensions applied to my nether-regions... bleh!

PS. All you little boys still afraid of the neked female body need to do some growing up!

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:58:52 -0700

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Pubic Hair, Bizarre, fashion, spoof, parody' to 'Pubic Hair, Bizarre, fashion, spoof, parody, merkin' - edited by calvados

By swampgirl

swampgirl (http://swampgirl.videosift.com) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:26:12 -0700

Loved the peacock, LOL!

By dag

dag (http://dag.videosift.com) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:11:10 -0700

Smibbo - can you give us your source that this is a viral campaign for Remington?

By dag

dag (http://dag.videosift.com) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:16:21 -0700

Smibbo is right: http://www.ragingartists.com/artists-in-advertising/2006/09/remington.html

*viral for sure

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:16:21 -0700

Adding video to channels (Viral) - requested by dag.

By Fletch

Fletch (http://fletch.videosift.com) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:54:25 -0700

This video would have been discarded out of hand 6 months ago. Still think it's inappropriate for VS, but I guess that means I need to grow up, huh? LiveSift? VideoLeak?

Since anything goes now...

By bamdrew

bamdrew (http://www.videosift.com/member/bamdrew) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:08:44 -0700

very well done. its too clever to be porn.

(I'd add a bit about the mockumentary artists and Remington if it twas my post.)

By raven

raven (http://www.videosift.com/member/raven) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:41:43 -0700

Fletch, nudity does not = pornography (which is what is banned here, no one ever said no to boobies). Just because a person is naked does not mean they are doing anything remotely erotic or sexual (pornographic). Eroticism is all in the actions, scenario, atmosphere and other psychological factors employed... just being naked does not a porno make. These models are a pretty good example because they are not only naked, but displaying, uh... art(?) in an area considered to be erogenous; yet still, they are not doing anything at all sexual, rather they are acting like typical underfed, prissy, pissed off, walking clothes racks... I'm pretty sure very few people viewing this felt at all aroused, probably most of them were like me and were just fighting to keep lunch down.

And for anyone who still thinks that a lack of clothing instantly equals porn or is bound to trigger some kind of sinful, impure thoughts, I highly recommend you take a life drawing class (even if you suck at drawing or have never done it before), not only will you come to appreciate the fact that about 90% of people probably look better with their clothes on, but you will be treated to one of the most un-erotic experiences of your life... and even the most juvenile of you boys will probably realize that, surprise! It is entirely possible to be in a room with a neked woman and not get a big rubbery one...

If you can't get yourself enrolled in a drawing class, then take a trip to a nude beach, because THAT will probably be just as instructive... although the nudists might insist you take off your trunks too, in which case, well, don't say I didn't warn you

By dag

dag (http://dag.videosift.com) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:00:03 -0700

^ I concur with this. And before you bring up my discarding of the nude magician ages ago - I would like to say that I didn't do it because of the nudity - but because she pulled a hanky out of her woowoo.

And I recanted.

By MarineGunrock

MarineGunrock (http://marinegunrock.videosift.com) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:25:49 -0700

Rofl @ "woowoo"

Yeah. To say that this is inappropriate would be like saying that Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus is inappropriate.

Yeah, I blogged it, but that's because I wasn't sure if it was acceptable by the community standards. I find it humorous.

By qruel

qruel (http://www.videosift.com/member/qruel) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:37:55 -0700

holy fuck (no anger implied) this is a shit ton of posts !
whoo hoo I'm number 53 !

By qruel

qruel (http://www.videosift.com/member/qruel) — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:41:32 -0700

aside from the naked bodies :-) I thought this was an extemely well done spoof, with just the right amount of pretentiousness to its real life counter part. good sift for humor and shock value !

By Fedquip

Fedquip (http://fedquip.videosift.com) — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:24:08 -0700

Did you see the Peacock?

Possibly the funniest moment now on the internet.

By thesnipe

thesnipe (http://thesnipe.videosift.com) — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:43:34 -0700

Holy crap that peacock is insane haha. *sexuality

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:43:34 -0700

Videos are limited to being in a maximum of 5 channels - ignoring all requests by thesnipe.

By ant

ant (http://www.videosift.com/member/ant) — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:22:00 -0700

Can we please change/remove the thumbnail? I noticed this is in the top 5? People viewing this, at work or in public places, can get in trouble.

By raven

raven (http://www.videosift.com/member/raven) — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:18:18 -0700

Dude, ant, the thumbnail is tiny tiny on the top 15... do you do QA for the gestapo or something? Conversely, one could always consider not mixing sift with work... I know I sure don't.

By ant

ant (http://www.videosift.com/member/ant) — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:45:15 -0700

I VS daily, during my lunch hour. And yes, I do QA (Internet security software).

By campionidelmondo

campionidelmondo (http://www.videosift.com/member/campionidelmondo) — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:10:14 -0700

Upvote because this is the weirdest video I've seen.

Oh and the comment from the prude american thinking this is porn is the dumbest comment I've ever seen! When you shower in your YMCA do you scream "STOP THE PORN!"? No seriously, you're retarded!

By MarineGunrock

MarineGunrock (http://marinegunrock.videosift.com) — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:17:26 -0700

campionidelmondo,
Please refrain from personal attacks.

By sweetlez

sweetlez (http://www.videosift.com/member/sweetlez) — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:45:17 -0700

'TVF Model' is superimposed under every model's name in the clip.
TVF = The Viral Factory. They're one of the few ad agencies that actually make funny stuff.

By gorillaman

gorillaman (http://www.videosift.com/member/gorillaman) — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:20:07 -0700

Is it time to make it 3 goldies to ban?

By thehelix

thehelix (http://www.videosift.com/member/thehelix) — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:53:29 -0700

WTF? This is beyond bizarre! LOL at the peacock

By Anea

Anea (http://www.videosift.com/member/Anea) — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:30:58 -0700

This is hilarious! I don't find this in any way inappropriate for this site. Love it.

By Thylan

Thylan (http://www.videosift.com/member/Thylan) — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:02:20 -0800

*dead

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:02:20 -0800

This published video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by Thylan.

By jonny

jonny (http://www.videosift.com/member/jonny) — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:56:43 -0800

here's the original for a diamond fixer

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:21:50 -0800

Awarding Grimm with one star point for fixing this video's dead embed code.