Comments for "PS3 Vs. PS2 ... See The Difference! (Wow!)" Video at VideoSift.com

By InvaderSil

InvaderSil (http://www.videosift.com/member/InvaderSil) — Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:56:44 -0700

Sony can bite my shiny metal ass. Wait...nevermind..I'm not a Nintendo fanboy anymore, my psychologist tells me...not a fanboy..not a fanboy.....

By SnakePlissken

SnakePlissken (http://www.videosift.com/member/SnakePlissken) — Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:15:39 -0700

Note to Sony: Selling your new product by pointing out how bland and unimpressive your old product was might not turn out to be the smartest marketing decision ever.

Wii will win this battle.

By ambassdor

ambassdor (http://www.videosift.com/member/ambassdor) — Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:24:40 -0700

HAHAHA.. Never knew PS2 was such a piece of junk!!

By charlatantric

charlatantric (http://www.videosift.com/member/charlatantric) — Wed, 23 Aug 2006 02:18:25 -0700

In theory, it's impressive. But watching the live in-game action at the end, it's just as clunky as the old versions.

By deathcow

deathcow (http://www.videosift.com/member/deathcow) — Wed, 23 Aug 2006 03:45:42 -0700

Looks bad ass to me and I look forward to playing warfare games on it.

By Anliz

Anliz (http://www.videosift.com/member/Anliz) — Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:45:17 -0700

I didnt know the PS2 was so clunky.

Ah well, Im going for the Wii anyways

By cobalt

cobalt (http://www.videosift.com/member/cobalt) — Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:07:52 -0700

The PS2 was the least powerful last gen console so this doesn't surprise me at all. It looks very pretty in those early demo bit but the model itself didn't appear any better than the 360 demos that we've seen. Of course its hard to tell from a poor quality vid liike that...

As others mentioned the framerates on gameplay looked poor, like 20-25 fps with dips into 10-15