Comments for "Clinton campagin encouraging Democrats to watch Fox News" Video at VideoSift.com

By kulpims

kulpims (http://www.videosift.com/member/kulpims) — Thu, 22 May 2008 03:04:07 -0700

*promote

By siftbot

siftbot (http://www.videosift.com/member/siftbot) — Thu, 22 May 2008 03:04:07 -0700

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Wednesday, May 21st, 2008 5:42pm PDT - promote requested by kulpims.

By charliem

charliem (http://www.videosift.com/member/charliem) — Thu, 22 May 2008 03:16:37 -0700

If the news reflects the people, then there must be a liberal bias in the population.

By schmawy

schmawy (http://schmawy.videosift.com) — Thu, 22 May 2008 05:53:00 -0700

>> ^charliem:
If the news reflects the people, then there must be a liberal bias in the population.

Was it Steven Colbert that said "Reality has a Liberal Bias"?

By gwiz665

gwiz665 (http://www.videosift.com/member/gwiz665) — Thu, 22 May 2008 08:32:33 -0700

He would be right. Reality has a known liberal bias.

By rychan

rychan (http://www.videosift.com/member/rychan) — Thu, 22 May 2008 08:35:12 -0700

How exactly is Obama more liberal than Clinton? Their policies are 90% in agreement. The major policy difference is that Clinton has the more inclusive, more expensive universal health care proposal. Obama supported unilateral strikes in Pakistan for terrorists, which Clinton thought was insanely aggressive. Obama supports dialogs with Iran, which seems most similar to Nixon or Reagan's policies, but could be argued to be the more liberal policy.

Anyway I don't see Obama as being significantly more liberal than Clinton. One could reasonably argue that he is less liberal.

By Zonbie

Zonbie (http://zonbie.videosift.com) — Thu, 22 May 2008 09:28:14 -0700

wow, nearly four minutes of concentrated bullshit.

By honkeytonk73

honkeytonk73 (http://www.videosift.com/member/honkeytonk73) — Thu, 22 May 2008 12:29:21 -0700

I don't think bullshit could be any more concentrated than that.

By chilaxe

chilaxe (http://www.videosift.com/member/chilaxe) — Thu, 22 May 2008 12:57:15 -0700

Weasels... they only lost when it was their's to win because they ran her campaign incompetently.

By RhesusMonk

RhesusMonk (http://www.videosift.com/member/RhesusMonk) — Thu, 22 May 2008 13:49:49 -0700

There should be a single box for FoxNews on the "submit" screen that automatically checks the politics, lies, election08 and terrible tags.

By gourmetemu

gourmetemu (http://www.videosift.com/member/gourmetemu) — Thu, 22 May 2008 17:58:12 -0700

I'm glad they're willing to validate their oppositions stereotypes.

By guitarwolf

guitarwolf (http://www.videosift.com/member/guitarwolf) — Thu, 22 May 2008 19:41:36 -0700

This is sick! Clinton has sunk to a new low trying to convince supporters to watch "The Enemy". The only reason she is resulting to this is because she is desperate and Fox is doing nothing but trying to drag Obama's name through the dirt. I guess this is the "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" strategy. Pathetic!! She does not care about democratic values... only herself!

By dag

dag (http://dag.videosift.com) — Fri, 23 May 2008 20:31:48 -0700

Disgusting. Murdoch would love Hillary to be the Democratic candidate- nothing would rally Republicans and independents around McCain more than that.

By deedub81

deedub81 (http://www.videosift.com/member/deedub81) — Sun, 25 May 2008 13:46:27 -0700

Well, it's a good thing that the news doesn't accurately reflect the demographics of this country. If it did, then Democrats would always win every election by a landslide.

>> ^charliem:
If the news reflects the people, then there must be a liberal bias in the population.