Comments for "America's War - World War II in colour" Video at VideoSift.com

By Krupo

Krupo (http://krupo.videosift.com) — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:09:11 -0800

Heh, smashed office equipment. I like the "Bridge Ahead Under Fire" sign. I should put that up somewhere in the area for kicks.

By Thereisnoinvisiblefriend

Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:25:44 -0800

The attitude that results in a documentary about the Second World War being named 'America's War' is responsible for 99.9% of anti-American sentiment in the world.

Like, seriously. 23 million Soviets (14% of the population) died; Britain endured rationing until 1954, ; Japan got 2 nuclear bombs dropped on its cities; Germany was flattened to rubble. The USA lost a paltry 0.4 million soldiers (0.32% population) and virtually no civilians, didn't have any rationing at all, and never suffered any mainland attacks, but it's called "America's War". Am I the only person here that thinks that's disgustingly inappropriate?

By qbert

qbert (http://www.videosift.com/member/qbert) — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:41:41 -0800

Agree with the second paragraph of your comment, anyway. The first, well, I guess that was hyperbole... ;o)

By ant

ant (http://www.videosift.com/member/ant) — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:33:05 -0800

Where are the other parts???

By Thylan

Thylan (http://www.videosift.com/member/Thylan) — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:51:02 -0800

America's war was Vietnam. WW2 belonged to a shit lot of people.

By kulpims

kulpims (http://www.videosift.com/member/kulpims) — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 03:25:46 -0800

Part 2 of 5: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=dee_1178420187
Part 3 of 5: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0d4_1178420589
Part 4 of 5: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2f9_1178420912
Part 5 of 5: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5c3_1178421380